On Aug 15, 2011, at 2:12 AM, 许凌志(Jamesxu) wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On Aug 14, 2011, at 11:43 AM, 许凌志(Jamesxu) wrote:
>
>> Hi, Last week I have done following things:
>> 1.Implemented the relative references for link generation
>> 2. implemented the default suggestions for sub-trigger "attach:",
"."
and
>> "@"
>> The default suggestion for trigger "attach:" is the attachments that
>> belongs to recently modified pages.
>> The default suggestion for trigger "." has two different situations:
>> 1). when "." is after "attach:" the default suggestion is
the
>> attachments that belongs to recently modifed pages under the specific
> space
>> 2). when "." is not after "attach:" the default
suggestion is the
> wiki
>> pages under specific space.
>> The default suggestion for trigger "@" is the attachments that
belongs
>> to the specific wikipage.
>> 3. Re-design the interface of the suggestion box according to Marius'
>> suggestions, and it attracts some advantages from the suggestion box of
>> confluence wiki.
>>
>> Till now the Major functions for link suggestion of wiki editor has
been
>> done, here is the video of the link
suggestion for wiki editor.
>> Please see the demo video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_be-3oqgzE
>> In next week, I will do the following things;
>> 1. Design the image suggestion functions and discuss with mentors.
>> 2. Test the link suggestion functions in IE, chrome, to consider the
>> compatibility of the functions.
>> 3. Refine the functions accroding to the review of mentors.
>
> Sounds cool.
>
> Some questions:
> - What's the status of the integration of your code into the platform?
Is
it ready
to be integrated?
Till now, all the functions for link suggestion has been almost done, but
indeed I need to clean up the codes, and also make sure it works fine in
various mainstream browsers, till now, I only tested it in firefox 4 and
5,
I think I need a list of browers which the
functions should be tested on
it.
Because all I have done is related to js, no java
codes, so I think test
is
a problem, I think selemium is a good test tools
to test some of the
functions, but I still need to discuss with Mentors about the test
strategy.
Indeed. Jerome Velociter has also committed a JS test framework last week
(don't remember its name though). Might be interesting for you.
So, Jermoe Velociter could you give me some documents about your test
framewokr? and could you give me your irc id?
- Is it clean code or do you need to clean things
up?
Yes, I need to clean some things up, I
will do these things this week
> - Do you have automated tests for it to prove that it works and that
it'll
continue
to work in the future?
Till now I didn't do automated tests, I need to discuss with mentors
about
the test method and strategies for js and this
functions
>
> Basically I think you should start to focus on the integration
part/clean
> up/stabilization/testing part since the end
of summer is approaching
fast :)
Ok, in this week I will focus on the clean up stabilization and testing
part.
Thanks!
-Vincent
> Is there a way to test what you have written
so far? (it's ok if I have
to
> build it).
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>> --
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> 许凌志(Jame Xu)
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Best wishes,
许凌志(Jame Xu)
MOE KLINNS Lab and SKLMS Lab, Xi'an Jiaotong University
Department of Computer Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University