On Jul 25, 2008, at 10:56 AM, Anca Paula Luca
wrote:
>
> Vincent Massol wrote:
>> On Jul 25, 2008, at 10:15 AM, Anca Paula Luca wrote:
>>
>>> Vincent Massol wrote:
>>>> I'd be fine with
>>>>
http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ExternalNews/WebHome
>>>> but I think it's better to have a top level domain name for
>>>> several
>>>> reasons:
>>>> * better visibility
>>>> * easier to go to rather than having to go
xwiki.org and click
>>>> on a
>>>> link
>>>> * easier for upgrades (XE on
xwiki.org and watch are separate)
>>> this makes me +1 for a separate wiki. I would have had it in the
>>> watch wiki on
>>>
xwiki.org but, since the goal is to have the latest version of
>>> watch
>>> running
>>> there, we need to make sure it is freely upgradable (which can
>>> require upgrading
>>> the underlying XE).
>>>
>>> Otherwise, I still think it should be on
watch.xwiki.org rather
>>> than
>>>
xwiki.org
>>> for consistency reasons, since it would be a demo of watch --
>>> that
>>> is the main
>>> purpose as I see it, allowing people to click around and have a
>>> quick look
>>> without having to download, install, etc.
>> Then we still have a disagreement :)
>>
>> Right now (and I'd like to keep it this way) all wikis on the
>>
xwiki.org domain are for *real*. They are not test platforms for
>> people to see how xwiki works and have some fun trying it. They
>> have
>> real usages (documentation of the xwiki software).
>> We have one exception: this is
playground.xwiki.org which is
>> there
>> for
>> people to test and play around.
>>
>> Thus my proposal is:
>>
>> 1) have a new wiki (
news.xwiki.org, same as we have
>>
jira.xwiki.org,
>>
svn.xwiki.org and
maven.xwiki.org) which will be our news
>> "portal".
>> Note: It will also listen to the
xwiki.org Blog feed.
>> 2) have a Watch space in
playground.xwiki.org for people to try
>> out
>> Watch.
> it makes a lot of sense, so:
> +0 for 1: it would be nice to have it, it would be nice to have it
> working
> properly (having people *really* collaboratively watching) but
> that
> is not the
> purpose I started this thread for.
I think we would learn a lot from it, eating our own dog food at
the
community level.
> +1 for 2, since this one is :). But now we're back one mail to the
> upgrade
> problem: I would like to have always the last version of watch
> running in the
> playground, which could require platform / XE upgrades, from
> time to
> time, since
> the plugins & modules that watch is using don't really have their
> own lifecycle,
> yet.
We need to talk to Raff. I think right now playground is a
subwiki on
the
xwiki.org farm.
Right now the
xwiki.org is upgraded to the latest version of XE
whenever it's released (within 1 or 2 weeks usually) so I don't
see a
problem. When we do this upgrade we can upgrade watch too. And if
the
watch releases comes later we upgrade watch only. Unless final
watch
releases use non final XE releases. Is that the case?
no, it is not.
But XWatch milestones do use XE milestones and, since Watch release
cycles are
pretty long for the moment, it would be interesting to have all
milestones.
Do we use milestones on xwiki.org?