23 Aug
2016
23 Aug
'16
12:36 p.m.
Thomas Mortagne wrote:
It takes the following IMO:
* it works
* it does not break any retro compatibility
both are claimed.
There are unit tests.
The only danger of breaking anything is if dom4j does not faithfully
restore the XML source. I believe this can be ignored just as it has
been ignored by the implementation of transformations.
(probably not enabled by default for example)
No, it is enabled by default.
I could replace the dom4j output by a file copy if no relevant elements
are found.
Note however, that it operates on elements that were never allowed before.
Now Guillaume has a point. The issue you will quickly
have as soon as
you start using this is that you HAVE to modify your XAR trough
filesystem because you can't edit it in XWiki and export it anymore.
That is if you don't provide any tool to export this kind of XAR
extension.
I believe this is best practice to insure that the wiki does not insert
you surprise elements such as the author name or the edit comment. Is
this practice not corresponding at all what others are doing?
Using an XML-diff might be answering Guillaume's point... That's not
completely trivial.
Paul