Dan Miron wrote:
Hi!
I've been suggested the following:
".............................................................
I'm thinking of a modification on box macro
[Sat Jan 3 2009 17:02:10] … currently when you extends it you can define
the class: "code" in place of "box" for exemple
[Sat Jan 3 2009 17:03:34] … the problem is that it means having two
different css classes: box and code when the second one is basically a
copy part of the first with some more things like monospace
[Sat Jan 3 2009 17:04:27] … so I propose to change the box macro to add
the cutom class in place of replace box class with it: class="box code"
[Sat Jan 3 2009 17:04:37] … that way you will have in css:
[Sat Jan 3 2009 17:05:00] … #xwikimaincontainerinner .box {
margin: 1em 0;
padding: 0 1px;
overflow: auto;
background-color: #F1F7FF;
border: 1px dotted #555555;
}
#xwikimaincontainerinner .code {
font-family: courier, courier new, monospace;
white-space: pre;
}
[Sat Jan 3 2009 17:05:10] … same for other macro extending box
[Sat Jan 3 2009 17:05:41] … this is way cleaner and easier to change the
graphical box for all box macros
[Sat Jan 3 2009 17:05:44] … WDYT ?
.....................................................
"
Personally, I'm +1 for that, so if anyone has a different opinion,
please let me know.
+1
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/