21 Jan
2014
21 Jan
'14
6:06 p.m.
Just to add some precisions:
= What the migrator do =
1. Create a group XWikiMemberGroup, with XWikiAllGroup as the first member.
2. All global users of XWikiAllGroup are put inside XWikiMemberGroup and
removed from XWikiAllGroup.
3. All rights concerning XWikiAllGroup are changed (ex: "view for
XWikiAllGroup" -> "view for XWikiMemberGroup"). It does not break
anything
since XWikiAllGroup is a member of XWikiMemberGroup.
4. All candidacies (ie: join requests, etc...) are moved form XWikiAllGroup
to XWikiMemberGroup, to be consistent.
2014/1/21 Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau <gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com>
Sergiu:
Exactly, I don't have to have all global users in the this group. Only
those who are considered as "members" (ie: they have joined the wiki).
2014/1/21 Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com>
Why not make virtual XWikiAllGroup also contain
global users?
We can make:
xwiki.authentication.group.allgroupimplicit=0 -> no
xwiki.authentication.group.allgroupimplicit=1 -> yes, all local users
xwiki.authentication.group.allgroupimplicit=2 -> yes, local and global
Or do you want to have only some global users, not all of them?
On 01/21/2014 11:31 AM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau wrote:
Hi developers!
In Workspaces, we used to add global users in the XWikiAllGroup page of
a
subwiki to indicate that they are members of that
wiki.
Now, we have an option called "user scope", and we can have both global
&
local users in a subwiki. That means we have
global & local users in
XWikiAllGroup.
Then, it is a problem because it can not work when XWikiAllGroup is a
virtual group [1].
Then, I have proposed to create a new group, called XWikiMemberGroup,
that
hold the members of the subwiki. (Note:
XWikiAllGroup will be a member
of
XWikiMemberGroup, in order to say "a local
user is a member").
So, I have written a migration (again!) [2], to create the new group
with
the current content of XWikiAllGroup. In this
migration, I also changes
all
existing rights that occur on XWikiAllGroup to
make them effective for
XWikiMemberGroup. I did not want to duplicate these rights by just
adding
the sames for XWikiMemberGroup. I think it is
easier for the user to
only
take care of the XWikiMemberGroup. But it looks a
bit "magical", and
some
people don't like it.
I would like to have your opinion.
+1 for adding XWikiMemberGroup and to "migrate" rights (replace all
rights
given to XWikiAllGroup by rights given to
XWikiMemberGroup).
Thanks,
Louis-Marie
[1] http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-9886 - Enabling virtual
XWikiAllGroup breaks wiki membership
[2]
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/compare/feature-wiki-members -
Git branch for this proposal
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs