On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 15:18, Anca Luca<ancapaula.luca(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi,
Let's vote on how to handle the title behavior for the 2.0 final
release so that we're all on the same page.
After talking to several people here's what I propose:
1) We remove the top level H1 only if the title compat flag is on and
the title H1 is the same as the top level H1
2) The compat flag is off by default in our distributions
Couldn't this be fixed by migration so that we make sure all documents in a 2.0
instance are "clean": they have a title, same as the heading 1 if title misses
or just the title if title = heading 1? If I understand correctly this would
only be needed by upgraders, so why not build them correct documents instead of
providing a flag to switch?
3) We modify the Toucan and Albatross skins to
display the title (same
as Colibri)
-0
I don't like this idea of modifying the old skins: we're building a new, better
skin, right? it's one of the improvements of the new skin over old skins, if
people want to still use toucan and benefit from this, they should hack it
themselves at their own risks (if any). It seems cleaner, even if not very
user-friendly.
4) We modify the Default XE XAR to have titles
for all its pages (and
remove the header 1 in page content)
This should also mean changing all =headings= to ==headings==, since
This is wrong, = does not mean page title, it mean level one section
header. The fact that the graphical title of the page is a <h1> or
something else is a skin implementation details it should not impact
the content that way.
semantically speaking, now that the page title is
displayed with h1, everything
under should be a h2, in a "normal" semantic.
I don't see any use case when, in the document, there is a heading as important
as the page title, but I agree we should allow it (if a user really really wants
it).
Actually, that's how I now see the structure of a document (how it should be
built to be "correct"):
title: |Page_title________________
== first section
lorem ipsum
== second section
lorem ipsum
Now, this would require adjusting section editing and default toc.
In a doc structure based on h1 sections, we should provide section editing for
the document title (so that the first section of the document can be edited
through its associated H1) -- would this actually make sense for the user?
This should cover both user upgrades and new behavior. Note that user
custom skin will still work in most cases since they're not normally
touching the contentview.vm file.
Here's my +1
otherwise 0,
it's hard to have an opinion, nothing seems right...
Thanks,
Anca
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne