Vincent Massol wrote:
+1 for 120.
Yes, 120 is better as 128 _almost_ fits in my Eclipse.
Thanks
-Vincent
PS: I don't understand the rationale for 128. I don't think it has to
be a multiple of 64 :) 120 is 50% more of 80 so it has some rationale...
On May 30, 2008, at 6:32 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> Vincent said that he wanted to propose increasing the maximum line
> width
> for a while, but didn't get to do it yet. And since I want the same
> thing, I'm writing the proposal.
>
> So, the idea is to increase the line width to 128 (or 120? I like 128
> better), since:
> - nice code uses descriptive variable/method names, which tend to be
> quite long, so many method calls span 2 or more lines
> - we're past the stage where developers have small displays that can
> only display 80 (or 100) characters at a time
> - right now the eclipse settings are at 98 chars, which is quite a
> silly
> number, and changing to only 100 is not worth the effort, so while
> we're
> increasing it, we can use a larger value
>
> Migration plan:
> - first, change the xwiki-verification-tools (next Tuesday)
> - we don't want to do a massive update, since it will probably create
> conflicts with the local changes for each developer, and break
> existing
> patches
> - whenever someone changes a file, he should first do a cleanup and
> commit the file without code changes, then a second commit with the
> actual behavior fix
> - never mix cosmetic changes with actual code affecting the
> behavior, as
> it will be hard to review that change
> - the copyright notice doesn't need to be updated
>
>
> So, everybody agrees? Do we use 120 or 128?
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/