Hi Ludovic,
I got the new code and I could build that successfully. The problem with
installation had been a compatibility issue with my android device. The
application's build target is 4.2.2 and my device has an older version.
I need to check this. I thought I had put an old minimum target but maybe
I've done that wrong
I built the project from source and installed it on an emulator. Now I am
trying to connect to a local server according to your previous message.
(using the emulator is slower than using the actual device as usual :) )
I could see that "Settings" page of a wiki has options to add the required
information. (I guess the user interface of that page can be improved to
look nicer) I will go through the prototype and let you know what changes
I'm working right now to add some code to detect most settings from the
host name.
This will simplify setup
are required in my point of view and what I think are
most important as you
instructed in a previous mail.
Yes that's the most important.
Take some time also to detail your experience with relevant technologies
Ludovic
Thank you.
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Ludovic Dubost <ludovic(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
I push some new code on the v2:
- an android source tree (which depends on Cordoba 2.7rc1 as other
cordovas
don't work with Android 4.2)
- some changes in the javascript code
Note to make android work you need to :
- add a link to src/main/www in assets/www (cd android/assets, ln -s
../../src/main/www www)
- change cordova-2.6.0 to cordova-2.7.0 in index.html
Ludovic
2013/5/1 Ludovic Dubost <ludovic(a)xwiki.com>
Hi,
I'm not sure why the apk does not work. I ran it fine on the simulator.
It
> could be a compatibility issue with your device (which is it ?)
> If the screens stays on wikis and tools it means initialization has
> failed, but it could be many things (failed to load translations,
failed
to
load cordova, etc..)
The easiest way to run the application is to run it on a local browser.
IE
and Safari I think can run it fine.
Firefox and Chrome will block on ajax requests because of security
issues.
>
> To fix this you can use:
>
> 1/ put the code behind a web server
> 2/ Use the Firefox CORS extension to force CORS headers which will
allow
cross
domain requests
I usually develop on Safari (on Mac) as it can run the code as is.
Ludovic
2013/4/30 Buddhiprabha Erabadda <buddhiprabha31481(a)gmail.com>
> Hi Ludovic,
>
> Thank you for your instructions regarding configurations. I had
previously
> taken the older JQuery Mobile version which
does not have a
configuration
> function.
>
> I downloaded the alpha release of the mobile client from the link you
> sent.[1] I installed it on my Android device and run it. But for some
> reason it only gives me a list view with two items "wikis" and
"tools"
and
>> it is not possible to process further. What can be the reason for
this?
>>
>> Since the apk did not work I tried to build it from the source.[2]
Since
> it
> had a build.xml inside the Android folder I built with ant and it was
> successfully built. But I was not able to run the project. Can you
please
>> advice me regarding building the project from source so that I can
test
>> the
>> current version of the mobile client? Thank you in advance.
>>
>> [1]
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/MobileClientAlphaRelease
https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/mobile-standardxwikiclient/tree/v2/android
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:08 AM, Ludovic Dubost <ludovic(a)xwiki.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Buddhiprabha,
>> >
>> > You are very welcome to make a good proposal in the mobile area that
>> would
>> > build on the current mobile client.
>> > You need to show us that you know what it means to do Mobile Web
>> > Development, that you understand the current architecture of the
code
>> and
>> > can work on the technologies needed (Cordova, Notifications, etc..).
>> > The next set of features will probably require slightly more native
>> > development.
>> >
>> > You can try to convince us that you are a good candidate by
analyzing
> >> the
> >> > current prototype and tell us what you think should be improved and
> what