Fabio Mancinelli wrote:
Vincent Massol wrote:
Note that I don't know what are the REST best
practices. I'm jut
noticing the inconsistency.
Ok. I saw what you meant.
I modified a bit the resources to remove the inconsistency.
I did this because attachments have also their own versioning.
So you can access a specific version of an attachment either by
requesting an attachment at a given page version
or by requesting an specific version of an attachment.
To be consistent I only left the resources for referring to an
attachment starting for a given page version:
/space/{space}/pages/{page}/attachments
/space/{space}/pages/{page}/attachments/{attachment}
/space/{space}/pages/{page}/{version}/attachments/
/space/{space}/pages/{page}/{version}/attachments/{attachment}
I still maintained the non-verbose version but that can be changed if
there is not an agreement on it.
However it might be still useful to expose attachment resources by using
their own versioning:
/space/{space}/pages/{page}/attachments/{attachment}/history
/space/{space}/pages/{page}/attachments/{attachment}/{version}
+1 for both (verbose):
/space/{space}/pages/{page}/history/{version}/attachments/{attachment}
/space/{space}/pages/{page}/attachments/{attachment}/history/{version}
But this should not work:
/space/{space}/pages/{page}/history/{version}/attachments/{attachment}/history/{version}
Since we either want to see all the versions of the attachment, or the
attachment variant used in a certain version of the document.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/