12 Jun
2008
12 Jun
'08
2:03 p.m.
Hi devs,
While working on the new GWT-based WYSIWYG editor, I find out that the
default DialogBox from GWT moves very slow when dragged if it contains
many HTML elements (like a table with 10 rows and 20 columns). In the
current WYSIWYG editor dialog boxes are used for color picker, custom
character, insert image / attachment / macro / table. Before I start
porting these dialogs to GWT I'd like to ask you:
Do you agree with using dialog boxes for these features?
* if so, do you think it's ok to optimize the way they are moved by
showing only their border while dragging (win95-like)?
* if not, how can we replace them?
Thanks,
Marius
12 Jun
12 Jun
2:06 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] New WYSIWYG editor with or without dialogs?
Hi Marius,
On Jun 12, 2008, at 2:03 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
Hi devs,
While working on the new GWT-based WYSIWYG editor, I find out that the
default DialogBox from GWT moves very slow when dragged if it contains
many HTML elements (like a table with 10 rows and 20 columns). In the
current WYSIWYG editor dialog boxes are used for color picker, custom
character, insert image / attachment / macro / table. Before I start
porting these dialogs to GWT I'd like to ask you:
Do you agree with using dialog boxes for these features?
* if so, do you think it's ok to optimize the way they are moved by
showing only their border while dragging (win95-like)?
* if not, how can we replace them?
Is that also a problem with GWT 1.5?
Thanks
-Vincent
2:18 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] New WYSIWYG editor with or without dialogs?
Hi Marius,
On Jun 12, 2008, at 2:03 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
This morning I tried to build with GWT 1.5 but:
* we don't have 1.5 in our repos
* there's no gwt-dev artifact on gwt-maven.googlecode.com repo
* gwt-dev is messed up or missing in repo1.maven.org (they switched the
version with the classifier only for linux; mac and windows versions are
ok..)
so I don't know if the problem persists in 1.5, but I suspect it does.
Hi devs,
While working on the new GWT-based WYSIWYG editor, I find out that the
default DialogBox from GWT moves very slow when dragged if it contains
many HTML elements (like a table with 10 rows and 20 columns). In the
current WYSIWYG editor dialog boxes are used for color picker, custom
character, insert image / attachment / macro / table. Before I start
porting these dialogs to GWT I'd like to ask you:
Do you agree with using dialog boxes for these features?
* if so, do you think it's ok to optimize the way they are moved by
showing only their border while dragging (win95-like)?
* if not, how can we replace them?
Is that also a problem with GWT 1.5?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
2:15 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] New WYSIWYG editor with or without dialogs?
Hi devs,
While working on the new GWT-based WYSIWYG editor, I find out that the
default DialogBox from GWT moves very slow when dragged if it contains
many HTML elements (like a table with 10 rows and 20 columns). In the
current WYSIWYG editor dialog boxes are used for color picker, custom
character, insert image / attachment / macro / table. Before I start
porting these dialogs to GWT I'd like to ask you:
Do you agree with using dialog boxes for these features?
* if so, do you think it's ok to optimize the way they are moved by
showing only their border while dragging (win95-like)?
If you do so, what are you showing instead of the dialog content ? the
content behind ? or a plain color ?
I think the main use case (if not the only ?) for moving such dialogs is
to see what's behind. In that case showing only the border and let the
user see what's behind is good IMO.
Jerome.
* if not, how can we replace them?
Thanks,
Marius
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
2:24 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] New WYSIWYG editor with or without dialogs?
On Jun 12, 2008, at 2:15 PM, Jerome Velociter wrote:
I can't believe GWT is not able to that properly and that some simple
javascript like we had was able to do it.
Is that a known issue of GWT?
Before we decide to use a degraded solution I'd like to be sure
there's no other way.
Thanks
-Vincent
Hi devs,
While working on the new GWT-based WYSIWYG editor, I find out that
the
default DialogBox from GWT moves very slow when dragged if it
contains
many HTML elements (like a table with 10 rows and 20 columns). In the
current WYSIWYG editor dialog boxes are used for color picker, custom
character, insert image / attachment / macro / table. Before I start
porting these dialogs to GWT I'd like to ask you:
Do you agree with using dialog boxes for these features?
* if so, do you think it's ok to optimize the way they are moved by
showing only their border while dragging (win95-like)?
If you do so, what are you showing instead of the dialog content ? the
content behind ? or a plain color ?
I think the main use case (if not the only ?) for moving such
dialogs is
to see what's behind. In that case showing only the border and let the
user see what's behind is good IMO.
2:41 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] New WYSIWYG editor with or without dialogs?
On Jun 12, 2008, at 2:15 PM, Jerome Velociter wrote:
I can't believe GWT is not able to that properly and that some simple
javascript like we had was able to do it.
Vincent, the current WYSIWYG editor uses windows for implementing the
dialog boxes. When you want to pick a color you open a window. You can see
it in the desktop toolbar. You can see it even if you change the browser
tab, which is not nice. Of course these windows are easily moved because
the OS take care of that.
In GWT dialog boxes are implemented using HTML elements (div for instance)
and JavaScript for catching mouse moves and simulating drag&drop.
Hi devs,
While working on the new GWT-based WYSIWYG editor, I find out that
the
default DialogBox from GWT moves very slow when dragged if it
contains
many HTML elements (like a table with 10 rows and 20 columns). In the
current WYSIWYG editor dialog boxes are used for color picker, custom
character, insert image / attachment / macro / table. Before I start
porting these dialogs to GWT I'd like to ask you:
Do you agree with using dialog boxes for these features?
* if so, do you think it's ok to optimize the way they are moved by
showing only their border while dragging (win95-like)?
If you do so, what are you showing instead of the dialog content ? the
content behind ? or a plain color ?
I think the main use case (if not the only ?) for moving such
dialogs is
to see what's behind. In that case showing only the border and let the
user see what's behind is good IMO. Is that a known issue of GWT?
Yes. But I don't think the default DialogBox was made to be scalable. If
you put only a button or so it moves very fast. I did some tests and it
moves slower and slower as you put more HTML elements.
Before we decide to use a degraded solution I'd like to be sure
there's no other way.
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
2:26 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] New WYSIWYG editor with or without dialogs?
Hi devs,
While working on the new GWT-based WYSIWYG editor, I find out that the
default DialogBox from GWT moves very slow when dragged if it contains
many HTML elements (like a table with 10 rows and 20 columns). In the
current WYSIWYG editor dialog boxes are used for color picker, custom
character, insert image / attachment / macro / table. Before I start
porting these dialogs to GWT I'd like to ask you:
Do you agree with using dialog boxes for these features?
* if so, do you think it's ok to optimize the way they are moved by
showing only their border while dragging (win95-like)?
If you do so, what are you showing instead of the dialog content ? the
content behind ? or a plain color ?
I think the main use case (if not the only ?) for moving such dialogs is
to see what's behind. In that case showing only the border and let the
user see what's behind is good IMO.
Jerome.
* if not, how can we replace them?
Thanks,
Marius
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
2:40 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] New WYSIWYG editor with or without dialogs?
On Jun 12, 2008, at 2:26 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
Yes, I'd like to show only a dashed (maybe) border and, possibly, a
background-color with some opacity level. This way I move only a div
with
its border, background-color and opacity and hide or leave in the same
place the dialog box, while dragging.
hmm... so it means we're doing pretty low level stuff and that GWT is
not offering much tools. I'm a bit worried that we're developing more
than we should. This will mean lots of maintenance too.
Isn't there any existing solutions for this?
Thanks
-Vincent
PS: Please bear with me as I've never developed with GWT so I don't
know what's available or not.
Hi devs,
While working on the new GWT-based WYSIWYG editor, I find out that
the
default DialogBox from GWT moves very slow when dragged if it
contains
many HTML elements (like a table with 10 rows and 20 columns). In
the
current WYSIWYG editor dialog boxes are used for color picker,
custom
character, insert image / attachment / macro / table. Before I start
porting these dialogs to GWT I'd like to ask you:
Do you agree with using dialog boxes for these features?
* if so, do you think it's ok to optimize the way they are moved by
showing only their border while dragging (win95-like)?
If you do so, what are you showing instead of the dialog content ?
the
content behind ? or a plain color ?
I think the main use case (if not the only ?) for moving such
dialogs is
to see what's behind. In that case showing only the border and let
the
user see what's behind is good IMO.
2:50 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] New WYSIWYG editor with or without dialogs?
On Jun 12, 2008, at 2:26 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
Yes, I'd like to show only a dashed (maybe) border and, possibly, a
background-color with some opacity level. This way I move only a div
with
its border, background-color and opacity and hide or leave in the same
place the dialog box, while dragging.
hmm... so it means we're doing pretty low level stuff and that GWT is
not offering much tools. I'm a bit worried that we're developing more
than we should. This will mean lots of maintenance too.
Isn't there any existing solutions for this?
I'd say that what GWT gives us is not scalable all the time. I'll look for
alternatives GWT libraries for both dialog boxes and drag&drop logic.
But, you don't have something against using dialog boxes? I know Anca has.
Hi devs,
While working on the new GWT-based WYSIWYG editor, I find out that
the
default DialogBox from GWT moves very slow when dragged if it
contains
many HTML elements (like a table with 10 rows and 20 columns). In
the
current WYSIWYG editor dialog boxes are used for color picker,
custom
character, insert image / attachment / macro / table. Before I start
porting these dialogs to GWT I'd like to ask you:
Do you agree with using dialog boxes for these features?
* if so, do you think it's ok to optimize the way they are moved by
showing only their border while dragging (win95-like)?
If you do so, what are you showing instead of the dialog content ?
the
content behind ? or a plain color ?
I think the main use case (if not the only ?) for moving such
dialogs is
to see what's behind. In that case showing only the border and let
the
user see what's behind is good IMO.
Thanks
-Vincent
PS: Please bear with me as I've never developed with GWT so I don't
know what's available or not.
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
3 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] New WYSIWYG editor with or without dialogs?
On Jun 12, 2008, at 2:50 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
No that's fine with me. My only concern is limiting the amount of
lines of code we write. The less we write the better it is.
I'm really surprised there's no good already existing WYSIWYG editor
based on GWT. It's a pity since I'm pretty sure it'll exist relatively
soon and we'll already have done all our work... Since it's not
XWiki's job to write WYSIWYG editors it's a pity we have to write it.
If we could have focused on just choosing what controls we wanted +
the html <-> wiki conversions that would have been better.
Anyway that's probably the cost of being early adopters... I hope our
editor will really rock thanks to that and keep us ahead of the
competition :) (although when a real cool GWT editor is created the
competition will be able to leapfrog us).
Thanks
-Vincent
On Jun 12, 2008, at 2:26 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
hmm... so it means we're doing pretty low level stuff and that GWT is
not offering much tools. I'm a bit worried that we're developing more
than we should. This will mean lots of maintenance too.
Isn't there any existing solutions for this?
I'd say that what GWT gives us is not scalable all the time. I'll
look for
alternatives GWT libraries for both dialog boxes and drag&drop logic.
But, you don't have something against using dialog boxes? I know
Anca has. > Hi
devs,
>
> While working on the new GWT-based WYSIWYG editor, I find out that
> the
> default DialogBox from GWT moves very slow when dragged if it
> contains
> many HTML elements (like a table with 10 rows and 20 columns). In
> the
> current WYSIWYG editor dialog boxes are used for color picker,
> custom
> character, insert image / attachment / macro / table. Before I
> start
> porting these dialogs to GWT I'd like to ask you:
>
> Do you agree with using dialog boxes for these features?
> * if so, do you think it's ok to optimize the way they are moved
> by
> showing only their border while dragging (win95-like)?
If you do so, what are you showing instead of the dialog content ?
the
content behind ? or a plain color ?
I think the main use case (if not the only ?) for moving such
dialogs is
to see what's behind. In that case showing only the border and let
the
user see what's behind is good IMO.
Yes, I'd like to show only a dashed (maybe) border and, possibly, a
background-color with some opacity level. This way I move only a div
with
its border, background-color and opacity and hide or leave in the
same
place the dialog box, while dragging. 
13 Jun
13 Jun
3:30 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] New WYSIWYG editor with or without dialogs?
Vincent Massol wrote:
I'm really surprised there's no good already
existing WYSIWYG editor
based on GWT. It's a pity since I'm pretty sure it'll exist relatively
soon and we'll already have done all our work... Since it's not
XWiki's job to write WYSIWYG editors it's a pity we have to write it.
If we could have focused on just choosing what controls we wanted +
the html <-> wiki conversions that would have been better.
Anyway that's probably the cost of being early adopters... I hope our
editor will really rock thanks to that and keep us ahead of the
competition :) (although when a real cool GWT editor is created the
competition will be able to leapfrog us).
Well, after we have the first working version, we can release it as a generic editor, so
we can be
that really cool GWT editor. If it's outside, we won't be able to control it (as
in "strongly
request the features we need"). If we manage to make it generic enough to attract a
community, we
can emphasize the features we need, and let others make it glittery and shiny, so
we'll have the
best editor custom made for XWiki.
So Marius, keep in mind that any XWiki specific feature must not be hard wired in the
editor.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
3:35 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] New WYSIWYG editor with or without dialogs?
On Jun 13, 2008, at 3:30 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
Vincent Massol wrote:
Yes I know we could do this and I even agree completely in theory...
but... creating a community and making a generic product is a *LOT* of
work and we don't have half of the required manpower to do that. It's
already difficult enough to do it for XWiki and we don't want to take
away people from the XWiki so that they spend all their time on
fostering a GWT WYSIWYG editor community IMO.
Now IF someone approaches us and that person want to separate our
WYSIWYG editor and make it an external project then yes that'd be
great and the best and we could support that person. But supporting
and doing it are a very different things.
-Vincent
I'm really surprised there's no good
already existing WYSIWYG editor
based on GWT. It's a pity since I'm pretty sure it'll exist
relatively
soon and we'll already have done all our work... Since it's not
XWiki's job to write WYSIWYG editors it's a pity we have to write it.
If we could have focused on just choosing what controls we wanted +
the html <-> wiki conversions that would have been better.
Anyway that's probably the cost of being early adopters... I hope our
editor will really rock thanks to that and keep us ahead of the
competition :) (although when a real cool GWT editor is created the
competition will be able to leapfrog us).
Well, after we have the first working version, we can release it as
a generic editor, so we can be
that really cool GWT editor. If it's outside, we won't be able to
control it (as in "strongly
request the features we need"). If we manage to make it generic
enough to attract a community, we
can emphasize the features we need, and let others make it glittery
and shiny, so we'll have the
best editor custom made for XWiki. So Marius, keep in mind that any XWiki specific
feature must not be
hard wired in the editor.
12 Jun
12 Jun
3:02 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] New WYSIWYG editor with or without dialogs?
>
> On Jun 12, 2008, at 2:26 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
>
>>>> Hi devs,
>>>>
>>>> While working on the new GWT-based WYSIWYG editor, I find out that
>>>> the
>>>> default DialogBox from GWT moves very slow when dragged if it
>>>> contains
>>>> many HTML elements (like a table with 10 rows and 20 columns). In
>>>> the
>>>> current WYSIWYG editor dialog boxes are used for color picker,
>>>> custom
>>>> character, insert image / attachment / macro / table. Before I start
>>>> porting these dialogs to GWT I'd like to ask you:
>>>>
>>>> Do you agree with using dialog boxes for these features?
>>>> * if so, do you think it's ok to optimize the way they are moved by
>>>> showing only their border while dragging (win95-like)?
>>>
>>> If you do so, what are you showing instead of the dialog content ?
>>> the
>>> content behind ? or a plain color ?
>>> I think the main use case (if not the only ?) for moving such
>>> dialogs is
>>> to see what's behind. In that case showing only the border and let
>>> the
>>> user see what's behind is good IMO.
>>
>> Yes, I'd like to show only a dashed (maybe) border and, possibly, a
>> background-color with some opacity level. This way I move only a div
>> with
>> its border, background-color and opacity and hide or leave in the same
>> place the dialog box, while dragging.
>
> hmm... so it means we're doing pretty low level stuff and that GWT is
> not offering much tools. I'm a bit worried that we're developing more
> than we should. This will mean lots of maintenance too.
I'm afraid I'll have to do lower level stuff for the rich text area (part
of witch is already done). GWT is a nice framework in photos but when you
meet him in person you realize you have to do many things by yourself.
Nevertheless it allows you to write Java code instead of JavaScript, which
is very important.
Isn't there any existing solutions for this?
I'd say that what GWT gives us is not scalable all the time. I'll look for
alternatives GWT libraries for both dialog boxes and drag&drop logic.
But, you don't have something against using dialog boxes? I know Anca has.
Thanks
-Vincent
PS: Please bear with me as I've never developed with GWT so I don't
know what's available or not.
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
3:10 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] New WYSIWYG editor with or without dialogs?
On Jun 12, 2008, at 3:02 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
[snip]
>>
I'm afraid I'll have to do lower level stuff
for the rich text area
(part
of witch is already done). GWT is a nice framework in photos but
when you
meet him in person you realize you have to do many things by yourself.
:)
Nevertheless it allows you to write Java code instead of JavaScript,
which
is very important.
Yes, except like you taught me, it's not really "Java", it's Java
without all the frameworks out there...
-Vincent
3:24 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] New WYSIWYG editor with or without dialogs?
On Jun 12, 2008, at 2:26 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
hmm... so it means we're doing pretty low level stuff and that GWT is
not offering much tools. I'm a bit worried that we're developing more
than we should. This will mean lots of maintenance too.
Isn't there any existing solutions for this?
I'd say that what GWT gives us is not scalable all the time. I'll look for
alternatives GWT libraries for both dialog boxes and drag&drop logic.
But, you don't have something against using dialog boxes? I know Anca has. > Hi
devs,
>
> While working on the new GWT-based WYSIWYG editor, I find out that
> the
> default DialogBox from GWT moves very slow when dragged if it
> contains
> many HTML elements (like a table with 10 rows and 20 columns). In
> the
> current WYSIWYG editor dialog boxes are used for color picker,
> custom
> character, insert image / attachment / macro / table. Before I start
> porting these dialogs to GWT I'd like to ask you:
>
> Do you agree with using dialog boxes for these features?
> * if so, do you think it's ok to optimize the way they are moved by
> showing only their border while dragging (win95-like)?
If you do so, what are you showing instead of the dialog content ?
the
content behind ? or a plain color ?
I think the main use case (if not the only ?) for moving such
dialogs is
to see what's behind. In that case showing only the border and let
the
user see what's behind is good IMO.
Yes, I'd like to show only a dashed (maybe) border and, possibly, a
background-color with some opacity level. This way I move only a div
with
its border, background-color and opacity and hide or leave in the same
place the dialog box, while dragging.
Thanks
-Vincent
PS: Please bear with me as I've never developed with GWT so I don't
know what's available or not.
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
3:32 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] New WYSIWYG editor with or without dialogs?
On Jun 12, 2008, at 3:24 PM, ancapaula.luca(a)xwiki.com wrote:
[snip]
I'd say that what GWT gives us is not
scalable all the time. I'll
look for
alternatives GWT libraries for both dialog boxes and drag&drop logic.
But, you don't have something against using dialog boxes? I know
Anca has.
I only have something against dialogs when they're used everywhere
as a
rule, including places that have no modal semantic: like choosing the
color of the text. Honestly, I don't see any reason at all why this
have
to be a dialog.
Right. A drop down box should be enough for this.
As for other situations (like adding an image to the
document), indeed, a dialog seems like the most natural choice...
I should mention that when I think about dialogs in a RIA I think
about
modal dialogs. Non-modals cause a lot of mess in desktop apps
already, I
don't even want to imagine what they could do in a web app.
I'm no HCI expert, I think we some opinions from people that know /
have
seen more of it would help a lot.
pretty interesting reading about dialogs and gwt versions:
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit/browse_thread/thread/8fd3…
They reverted it apparently.
-Vincent
13 Jun
13 Jun
3:21 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] New WYSIWYG editor with or without dialogs?
Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
Hi devs,
While working on the new GWT-based WYSIWYG editor, I find out that the
default DialogBox from GWT moves very slow when dragged if it contains
many HTML elements (like a table with 10 rows and 20 columns).
Are you sure it's not a Linux+Firefox bug? In some systems, the browser is very slow
when rendering
floating elements and transparent images. You should ask someone on windows to try.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
5996
days inactive
5997
days old
16 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
ancapaula.luca＠xwiki.com -
Jerome Velociter -
Marius Dumitru Florea -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Vincent Massol