15 Dec
2009
15 Dec
'09
9:35 a.m.
Hi,
We need to decide how we want to document xwiki.org with regards to
project versions and skins. For example the screenshot and features
described can depend on 2 factors:
- the project version (XE version for ex)
- the skin used
Project versions
=============
We have several choices:
1) We make the doc only for the latest version and in this case we
should probably export the pages at release time and make it available
as a zipped HTML export so that people using the older version can
refer to them.
2) We make the doc work the last 2 releases. That would be either 2.1
and 2.0.5 or 2.2M1 and 2.1 depending on how we view it and depending
on whether we want to document on xwiki.org before we release or not.
Personally I think I prefer option 1 with a little addition:
- whenever something that is new to the last release is documented, we
should add a little "New" logo (possibly with the version value, "New
in 2.2" for example). This could be done with a wiki macro.
If option 1 is chosen then we need to add a step to the release process.
Skins
====
Again we have several choices:
1) Document only for the latest skin
2) Document for all supported skins. Right now that would be Toucan +
Colibri (not sure about Albatross, I don't think we've officially said
it wasn't supported).
If we were to do 2) then this that for example this page
http://code.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Applications/WatchlistApplication
would need to contain screenshots for all supported skins *OR* there
should be different screenshots only when the skins have different
features. This is the case here since the location of menus and
actions are quite different.
I'm hesitating more for this one...
1) is definitely easier for us so I'm tempted to propose 1) but with
the proviso that we make it clear in the text when a feature is
available only for a given skin (for ex: the Show Code menu action is
avail in Colibri but not in Toucan).
WDYT?
When we agree we should put the result on dev.xwiki.org in a new page
describing how xwiki.org is documented.
Thanks
-Vincent
15 Dec
15 Dec
9:50 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] XWiki.org documentation rule for Versions and Skins
On 12/15/09 9:35 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi,
We need to decide how we want to document xwiki.org with regards to
project versions and skins. For example the screenshot and features
described can depend on 2 factors:
- the project version (XE version for ex)
- the skin used
Project versions
=============
We have several choices:
1) We make the doc only for the latest version and in this case we
should probably export the pages at release time and make it available
as a zipped HTML export so that people using the older version can
refer to them.
2) We make the doc work the last 2 releases. That would be either 2.1
and 2.0.5 or 2.2M1 and 2.1 depending on how we view it and depending
on whether we want to document on xwiki.org before we release or not.
Personally I think I prefer option 1 with a little addition:
- whenever something that is new to the last release is documented, we
should add a little "New" logo (possibly with the version value, "New
in 2.2" for example). This could be done with a wiki macro.
If option 1 is chosen then we need to add a step to the release process.
Skins
====
Again we have several choices:
1) Document only for the latest skin
2) Document for all supported skins. Right now that would be Toucan +
Colibri (not sure about Albatross, I don't think we've officially said
it wasn't supported).
If we were to do 2) then this that for example this page
http://code.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Applications/WatchlistApplication
would need to contain screenshots for all supported skins *OR* there
should be different screenshots only when the skins have different
features. This is the case here since the location of menus and
actions are quite different.
I'm hesitating more for this one...
1) is definitely easier for us so I'm tempted to propose 1) but with
the proviso that we make it clear in the text when a feature is
available only for a given skin (for ex: the Show Code menu action is
avail in Colibri but not in Toucan).
WDYT?
The text mention when the feature differ / is absent on an older (not
latest) skin sounds OK to me.
Jerome.
When we agree we should put the result on
dev.xwiki.org in a new page
describing how xwiki.org is documented.
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
10:11 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] XWiki.org documentation rule for Versions and Skins
Project Versions: +1 for 1)
I also like the idea with the logo addition. Maybe we could have an RSS feed
for documents that carry the "New" logo. This way XWiki users have an
additional way of staying up to date with the latest additions and
modifications.
Skins: +1 for 1) (documenting the latest skin), but obviously I am partial.
Hopefully XWiki users will help us reach a conclusion in this respect.
vmassol wrote:
Hi,
We need to decide how we want to document xwiki.org with regards to
project versions and skins. For example the screenshot and features
described can depend on 2 factors:
- the project version (XE version for ex)
- the skin used
Project versions
=============
We have several choices:
1) We make the doc only for the latest version and in this case we
should probably export the pages at release time and make it available
as a zipped HTML export so that people using the older version can
refer to them.
2) We make the doc work the last 2 releases. That would be either 2.1
and 2.0.5 or 2.2M1 and 2.1 depending on how we view it and depending
on whether we want to document on xwiki.org before we release or not.
Personally I think I prefer option 1 with a little addition:
- whenever something that is new to the last release is documented, we
should add a little "New" logo (possibly with the version value, "New
in 2.2" for example). This could be done with a wiki macro.
If option 1 is chosen then we need to add a step to the release process.
Skins
====
Again we have several choices:
1) Document only for the latest skin
2) Document for all supported skins. Right now that would be Toucan +
Colibri (not sure about Albatross, I don't think we've officially said
it wasn't supported).
If we were to do 2) then this that for example this page
http://code.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Applications/WatchlistApplication
would need to contain screenshots for all supported skins *OR* there
should be different screenshots only when the skins have different
features. This is the case here since the location of menus and
actions are quite different.
I'm hesitating more for this one...
1) is definitely easier for us so I'm tempted to propose 1) but with
the proviso that we make it clear in the text when a feature is
available only for a given skin (for ex: the Show Code menu action is
avail in Colibri but not in Toucan).
WDYT?
When we agree we should put the result on dev.xwiki.org in a new page
describing how xwiki.org is documented.
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-----
Silvia Rusu
Tester & Documentation Writer - XWiki
http://twitter.com/silviarusu
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Proposal-XWiki-org-documentation-rule-for-Versions-and…
Sent from the XWiki- Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
6:59 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] XWiki.org documentation rule for Versions and Skins
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 09:35, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi,
We need to decide how we want to document xwiki.org with regards to
project versions and skins. For example the screenshot and features
described can depend on 2 factors:
- the project version (XE version for ex)
- the skin used
Project versions
=============
We have several choices:
1) We make the doc only for the latest version and in this case we
should probably export the pages at release time and make it available
as a zipped HTML export so that people using the older version can
refer to them.
2) We make the doc work the last 2 releases. That would be either 2.1
and 2.0.5 or 2.2M1 and 2.1 depending on how we view it and depending
on whether we want to document on xwiki.org before we release or not.
Personally I think I prefer option 1 with a little addition:
- whenever something that is new to the last release is documented, we
should add a little "New" logo (possibly with the version value, "New
in 2.2" for example). This could be done with a wiki macro.
If option 1 is chosen then we need to add a step to the release process.
1) seams better. I don't understand the export as HTML part, what do
you want to export exactly ?
Skins
====
Again we have several choices:
1) Document only for the latest skin
2) Document for all supported skins. Right now that would be Toucan +
Colibri (not sure about Albatross, I don't think we've officially said
it wasn't supported).
Since Colibri and Toucan depends on Albatross it's kind of supported de facto.
If we were to do 2) then this that for example this page
http://code.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Applications/WatchlistApplication
would need to contain screenshots for all supported skins *OR* there
should be different screenshots only when the skins have different
features. This is the case here since the location of menus and
actions are quite different.
I'm hesitating more for this one...
1) is definitely easier for us so I'm tempted to propose 1) but with
the proviso that we make it clear in the text when a feature is
available only for a given skin (for ex: the Show Code menu action is
avail in Colibri but not in Toucan).
+1 for 1), i think 2) is not realistic currently (I'm not even sure 1)
is, at least we are far from it currently)
WDYT?
When we agree we should put the result on dev.xwiki.org in a new page
describing how xwiki.org is documented.
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
10:19 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] XWiki.org documentation rule for Versions and Skins
Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi,
We need to decide how we want to document xwiki.org with regards to
project versions and skins. For example the screenshot and features
described can depend on 2 factors:
- the project version (XE version for ex)
- the skin used
Project versions
=============
We have several choices:
1) We make the doc only for the latest version and in this case we
should probably export the pages at release time and make it available
as a zipped HTML export so that people using the older version can
refer to them.
2) We make the doc work the last 2 releases. That would be either 2.1
and 2.0.5 or 2.2M1 and 2.1 depending on how we view it and depending
on whether we want to document on xwiki.org before we release or not.
Personally I think I prefer option 1 with a little addition:
- whenever something that is new to the last release is documented, we
should add a little "New" logo (possibly with the version value, "New
in 2.2" for example). This could be done with a wiki macro.
We should also specify in which version the
feature/module/component/etc. was introduced (e.g. Since version 2.2).
If option 1 is chosen then we need to add a step to the release process.
+1 for 1)
Skins
====
Again we have several choices:
1) Document only for the latest skin
2) Document for all supported skins. Right now that would be Toucan +
Colibri (not sure about Albatross, I don't think we've officially said
it wasn't supported).
If we were to do 2) then this that for example this page
http://code.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Applications/WatchlistApplication
would need to contain screenshots for all supported skins *OR* there
should be different screenshots only when the skins have different
features. This is the case here since the location of menus and
actions are quite different.
I'm hesitating more for this one...
1) is definitely easier for us so I'm tempted to propose 1) but with
the proviso that we make it clear in the text when a feature is
available only for a given skin (for ex: the Show Code menu action is
avail in Colibri but not in Toucan).
+1 for 1)
Thanks,
Marius
WDYT?
When we agree we should put the result on dev.xwiki.org in a new page
describing how xwiki.org is documented.
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
16 Dec
16 Dec
10:33 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] XWiki.org documentation rule for Versions and Skins
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:35, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi,
We need to decide how we want to document xwiki.org with regards to
project versions and skins. For example the screenshot and features
described can depend on 2 factors:
- the project version (XE version for ex)
- the skin used
Project versions
=============
We have several choices:
1) We make the doc only for the latest version and in this case we
should probably export the pages at release time and make it available
as a zipped HTML export so that people using the older version can
refer to them.
2) We make the doc work the last 2 releases. That would be either 2.1
and 2.0.5 or 2.2M1 and 2.1 depending on how we view it and depending
on whether we want to document on xwiki.org before we release or not.
Personally I think I prefer option 1 with a little addition:
- whenever something that is new to the last release is documented, we
should add a little "New" logo (possibly with the version value, "New
in 2.2" for example). This could be done with a wiki macro.
I think that the things we mention in the release notes should be also found
in the features documentation pages.
The feature should state in its page that can be found/works in 2.x version.
It can have an improvements part of the documentation with all the latest
additions and the version that the addition can be found in. This is when
the improvement doesn't completely change the functionality.
I think the documentation should reflect the branches we support and archive
when we support no more.
Ex.
Application X - since XWiki 2.0,
- Colibri, Toucan compatible
....
Improvement X.x - since XWiki 2.1
Also I think we should specify in the applications pages from
code.xwiki.orgwhich is the version they were build on. There we can
make something like
Firefox add-ons: Works with, Updated, Developers, Downloads.
If option 1 is chosen then we need to add a step to
the release process.
Skins
====
Again we have several choices:
1) Document only for the latest skin
2) Document for all supported skins. Right now that would be Toucan +
Colibri (not sure about Albatross, I don't think we've officially said
it wasn't supported).
If we were to do 2) then this that for example this page
http://code.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Applications/WatchlistApplication
would need to contain screenshots for all supported skins *OR* there
should be different screenshots only when the skins have different
features. This is the case here since the location of menus and
actions are quite different.
I'm hesitating more for this one...
1) is definitely easier for us so I'm tempted to propose 1) but with
the proviso that we make it clear in the text when a feature is
available only for a given skin (for ex: the Show Code menu action is
avail in Colibri but not in Toucan).
Theoretically, if you don't document a skin, then we are not supporting it.
I think, just like with the version, the feature needs to specify with what
skin its working. If it has the same behavior for both skins, put
screenshots of the latest skin (the one that will be supported longer).
WDYT?
When we agree we should put the result on dev.xwiki.org in a new page
describing how xwiki.org is documented.
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
1:58 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] XWiki.org documentation rule for Versions and Skins
On 12/15/2009 09:35 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi,
We need to decide how we want to document xwiki.org with regards to
project versions and skins. For example the screenshot and features
described can depend on 2 factors:
- the project version (XE version for ex)
- the skin used
Project versions
=============
We have several choices:
1) We make the doc only for the latest version and in this case we
should probably export the pages at release time and make it available
as a zipped HTML export so that people using the older version can
refer to them.
2) We make the doc work the last 2 releases. That would be either 2.1
and 2.0.5 or 2.2M1 and 2.1 depending on how we view it and depending
on whether we want to document on xwiki.org before we release or not.
Isn't the documentation for older version available in the document
history? Can't we just:
- save with a "Documentation for XE 1.9" comment before starting to
update the documentation, so that we can easily identify which document
version applies to which product version
- (optional) add a list of older versions in the document pointing to
the right version from the history
Personally I think I prefer option 1 with a little
addition:
- whenever something that is new to the last release is documented, we
should add a little "New" logo (possibly with the version value, "New
in 2.2" for example). This could be done with a wiki macro.
If option 1 is chosen then we need to add a step to the release process.
Skins
====
Again we have several choices:
1) Document only for the latest skin
2) Document for all supported skins. Right now that would be Toucan +
Colibri (not sure about Albatross, I don't think we've officially said
it wasn't supported).
If we were to do 2) then this that for example this page
http://code.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Applications/WatchlistApplication
would need to contain screenshots for all supported skins *OR* there
should be different screenshots only when the skins have different
features. This is the case here since the location of menus and
actions are quite different.
I'm hesitating more for this one...
1) is definitely easier for us so I'm tempted to propose 1) but with
the proviso that we make it clear in the text when a feature is
available only for a given skin (for ex: the Show Code menu action is
avail in Colibri but not in Toucan).
I think we should document for all supported skins, but only when the
feature is different between the skins, not just on the aspect (colors),
but in placement, naming or functionality.
WDYT?
When we agree we should put the result on dev.xwiki.org in a new page
describing how xwiki.org is documented.
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
2:56 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] XWiki.org documentation rule for Versions and Skins
Hi,
On 12/16/2009 2:58 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On 12/15/2009 09:35 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Wouldn't it be hard to monitor all this comments for different
apps/products?
Hi,
We need to decide how we want to document xwiki.org with regards to
project versions and skins. For example the screenshot and features
described can depend on 2 factors:
- the project version (XE version for ex)
- the skin used
Project versions
=============
We have several choices:
1) We make the doc only for the latest version and in this case we
should probably export the pages at release time and make it available
as a zipped HTML export so that people using the older version can
refer to them.
2) We make the doc work the last 2 releases. That would be either 2.1
and 2.0.5 or 2.2M1 and 2.1 depending on how we view it and depending
on whether we want to document on xwiki.org before we release or not.
Isn't the documentation for older version available in the document
history? Can't we just:
- save with a "Documentation for XE 1.9" comment before starting to
update the documentation, so that we can easily identify which document
version applies to which product version
- (optional) add a list of older versions in the document pointing to
the right version from the history
I think you are suggesting what Microsoft is doing with msdn. Eg:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.io.file.aspx
A simple implementation would require:
- a basic wiki macro containing:
- application/product name
- list of older versions + links to other pages or older versions of
the same page
- manually updating the macro data when updating documentation(Should be
quite friendly with the new wysiwyg)
- (optional?) a script which updates all non-modified documentation
pages of the product on the product release.
The cost is probably a bit higher then solution (1), but not by much.
Thanks,
Florin Ciubotaru
Personally I think I prefer option 1 with a
little addition:
- whenever something that is new to the last release is documented, we
should add a little "New" logo (possibly with the version value, "New
in 2.2" for example). This could be done with a wiki macro.
If option 1 is chosen then we need to add a step to the release process.
Skins
====
Again we have several choices:
1) Document only for the latest skin
2) Document for all supported skins. Right now that would be Toucan +
Colibri (not sure about Albatross, I don't think we've officially said
it wasn't supported).
If we were to do 2) then this that for example this page
http://code.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Applications/WatchlistApplication
would need to contain screenshots for all supported skins *OR* there
should be different screenshots only when the skins have different
features. This is the case here since the location of menus and
actions are quite different.
I'm hesitating more for this one...
1) is definitely easier for us so I'm tempted to propose 1) but with
the proviso that we make it clear in the text when a feature is
available only for a given skin (for ex: the Show Code menu action is
avail in Colibri but not in Toucan).
I think we should document for all supported skins, but only when the
feature is different between the skins, not just on the aspect (colors),
but in placement, naming or functionality.
WDYT?
When we agree we should put the result on dev.xwiki.org in a new page
describing how xwiki.org is documented.
Thanks
-Vincent
5441
days inactive
5442
days old
7 comments
8 participants
participants (8)
-
Ecaterina Valica -
Florin Ciubotaru -
Jerome Velociter -
Marius Dumitru Florea -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Silvia Rusu -
Thomas Mortagne -
Vincent Massol