[xwiki-devs] Proposal to push wiki-nodes, the XWiki/Cassandra demonstration over to contrib.
5 Nov
2013
5 Nov
'13
11:23 a.m.
Hi guys,
It's been a while since this demo was created but I was looking at
my github and it has not been touched so I would like to document it
and put it in contrib where it's available.
I have a question about technique, this demo builds on the standard
version of xwiki-platform but requires a special version of xwiki-enterprise.
Is it ok to have a long term branch in the xwiki-enterprise repository or
should the entire repository be copied into contrib?
WDYT?
Caleb
5 Nov
5 Nov
11:26 a.m.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Caleb James DeLisle <cjd(a)hyperboria.ca>wrote;wrote:
Hi guys,
It's been a while since this demo was created but I was looking at
my github and it has not been touched so I would like to document it
and put it in contrib where it's available.
I have a question about technique, this demo builds on the standard
version of xwiki-platform but requires a special version of
xwiki-enterprise.
Is it ok to have a long term branch in the xwiki-enterprise repository or
should the entire repository be copied into contrib?
WDYT?
hmm, why don't you depend on binaries instead in your build?
This is what I did for some project and it worked well.
Thanks
-Vincent
11:35 a.m.
I'd hate to include patched binaries in the project because that makes
it completely unmaintainable to the next person, right now it builds
each of it's needed elements so the work could theoretically be picked
right back up where it stopped.
I suppose I could ship a big-ugly-patch and include a patch step in the
shell script but I won't have time to run this through all of the tests
so this will be a bit of a Hail Mary change..
Thanks,
Caleb
On 11/05/2013 11:26 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Caleb James DeLisle
<cjd(a)hyperboria.ca>wrote;wrote:
Hi guys,
It's been a while since this demo was created but I was looking at
my github and it has not been touched so I would like to document it
and put it in contrib where it's available.
I have a question about technique, this demo builds on the standard
version of xwiki-platform but requires a special version of
xwiki-enterprise.
Is it ok to have a long term branch in the xwiki-enterprise repository or
should the entire repository be copied into contrib?
WDYT?
hmm, why don't you depend on binaries instead in your build?
This is what I did for some project and it worked well.
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
12:04 p.m.
Done.
I did end up generating a patch against the 4.1-milestone-1 tag.
https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/compatibleone-xwiki-newstore
https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/compatibleone-wiki-nodes-demo
Thanks,
Caleb
On 11/05/2013 11:35 AM, Caleb James DeLisle wrote:
I'd hate to include patched binaries in the
project because that makes
it completely unmaintainable to the next person, right now it builds
each of it's needed elements so the work could theoretically be picked
right back up where it stopped.
I suppose I could ship a big-ugly-patch and include a patch step in the
shell script but I won't have time to run this through all of the tests
so this will be a bit of a Hail Mary change..
Thanks,
Caleb
On 11/05/2013 11:26 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Caleb James
DeLisle <cjd(a)hyperboria.ca>wrote;wrote:
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
Hi guys,
It's been a while since this demo was created but I was looking at
my github and it has not been touched so I would like to document it
and put it in contrib where it's available.
I have a question about technique, this demo builds on the standard
version of xwiki-platform but requires a special version of
xwiki-enterprise.
Is it ok to have a long term branch in the xwiki-enterprise repository or
should the entire repository be copied into contrib?
WDYT?
hmm, why don't you depend on binaries instead in your build?
This is what I did for some project and it worked well.
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
12:51 p.m.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Caleb James DeLisle <cjd(a)hyperboria.ca>wrote;wrote:
I'd hate to include patched binaries in the
project because that makes
it completely unmaintainable to the next person, right now it builds
each of it's needed elements so the work could theoretically be picked
right back up where it stopped.
I guess I wasn't clear. You should definitely never bundle binaries in the
source tree of course!
But you can depend on binary artifacts in your POM files...
I suppose I could ship a big-ugly-patch and include a patch step in the
shell script but I won't have time to run this
through all of the tests
so this will be a bit of a Hail Mary change..
Either a patch or use all the existing extension points available. Like
replace the storage by configuring xwiki.cfg, etc.
Thanks
-Vincent
Thanks,
Caleb
On 11/05/2013 11:26 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Caleb James
DeLisle <cjd(a)hyperboria.ca
wrote:
> Hi guys,
> It's been a while since this demo was created but I was looking at
> my github and it has not been touched so I would like to document it
> and put it in contrib where it's available.
>
> I have a question about technique, this demo builds on the standard
> version of xwiki-platform but requires a special version of
> xwiki-enterprise.
> Is it ok to have a long term branch in the xwiki-enterprise repository
or
should
the entire repository be copied into contrib?
WDYT?
hmm, why don't you depend on binaries instead in your build?
This is what I did for some project and it worked well.
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
3968
days inactive
3968
days old
4 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Caleb James DeLisle -
Vincent Massol