8 Aug
2011
8 Aug
'11
5:27 p.m.
Hi Devs,
I've updated http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/
I've also updated http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/SourceRepository
Please review it and let me know if it's ok.
I've removed several notions that don't make sense anymore like sandbox, personal
directory space.
There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving stuff from
http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
Thanks
-Vincent
8 Aug
8 Aug
7:30 p.m.
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi Devs,
I've updated http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/
I've also updated http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/SourceRepository
Please review it and let me know if it's ok.
I've removed several notions that don't make sense anymore like sandbox, personal
directory space.
There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving stuff from
http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
No, we always remove from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/
what we moved to github so everything you can find in there is
actually still not moved which means most of what we used to have.
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
10 Aug
10 Aug
3:43 p.m.
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>wrote;wrote:
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Actually, http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/projects/wiki30/ has
been moved to GitHub but is still present on SVN.
AFAIK, it can be safely removed from SVN since that version is now outdated.
Thanks,
Eduard
Hi Devs,
I've updated http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/
I've also updated
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/SourceRepository
Please review it and let me know if it's ok.
I've removed several notions that don't make sense anymore like sandbox,
personal directory space.
There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving
stuff from
http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
No, we always remove from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/
what we moved to github so everything you can find in there is
actually still not moved which means most of what we used to have.
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
9 Aug
9 Aug
6:44 a.m.
On 08/08/2011 11:27 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Devs,
I've updated http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/
I don't like this:
<version>See
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-commons/blob/master/pom.xml</version>
Hasty people could just copy/paste it as it is. How about putting that
as a comment:
<!-- See https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-commons/blob/master/pom.xml for
the latest available version -->
<version>3.1</version>
As a minor remark, it's repeated quite often that "your project can be
used as a dependency by other projects", so it could imply that
contributions are generally modules/libraries, and not stand-alone
applications.
I've also updated
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/SourceRepository
"XWiki is an ObjectWeb's project" is wrong, it should be OW2 (fixed it
already).
Please review it and let me know if it's ok.
I've removed several notions that don't make sense anymore like sandbox, personal
directory space.
Well, we could still say that github allows anyone to host its own
projects, without the need to be accepted on xwiki-contrib, and that any
repository can be later moved under the xwiki-contrib umbrella.
There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving stuff from
http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them ASAP?
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
9:45 a.m.
On Aug 9, 2011, at 6:44 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We need to decide
what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired organization on github or
simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention the "retired" in a top level
README?
Thanks
-Vincent
On 08/08/2011 11:27 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
I haven't touched any of those. They were there before. Please feel free to improve
them.
Hi Devs,
I've updated http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/
I don't like this:
<version>See
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-commons/blob/master/pom.xml</version>
Hasty people could just copy/paste it as it is. How about putting that
as a comment:
<!-- See https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-commons/blob/master/pom.xml for
the latest available version -->
<version>3.1</version>
As a minor remark, it's repeated quite often that "your project can be
used as a dependency by other projects", so it could imply that
contributions are generally modules/libraries, and not stand-alone
applications. > I've also updated
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/SourceRepository
I've also just added some information about the SVN GitHub view:
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/SourceRepository#HGettingSour…
"XWiki is an ObjectWeb's project" is
wrong, it should be OW2 (fixed it
already).
Yes I agree. Can you add it?
Please review it and let me know if it's ok.
I've removed several notions that don't make sense anymore like sandbox, personal
directory space.
Well, we could still say that github allows anyone to host its own
projects, without the need to be accepted on xwiki-contrib, and that any
repository can be later moved under the xwiki-contrib umbrella. There are
still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving stuff from
http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them ASAP?
9:59 a.m.
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On Aug 9, 2011, at 6:44 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We need to decide
what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired organization on github or
simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention the "retired" in a top level
README?
Would be nicer to separate active contributions from retired projects IMO.
On 08/08/2011 11:27 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
I haven't touched any of those. They were there before. Please feel free to improve
them.
Hi Devs,
I've updated http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/
I don't like this:
<version>See
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-commons/blob/master/pom.xml</version>
Hasty people could just copy/paste it as it is. How about putting that
as a comment:
<!-- See https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-commons/blob/master/pom.xml for
the latest available version -->
<version>3.1</version>
As a minor remark, it's repeated quite often that "your project can be
used as a dependency by other projects", so it could imply that
contributions are generally modules/libraries, and not stand-alone
applications. > I've also updated
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/SourceRepository
I've also just added some information about the SVN GitHub view:
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/SourceRepository#HGettingSour…
"XWiki is an ObjectWeb's project"
is wrong, it should be OW2 (fixed it
already).
Yes I agree. Can you add it?
Please review it and let me know if it's ok.
I've removed several notions that don't make sense anymore like sandbox, personal
directory space.
Well, we could still say that github allows anyone to host its own
projects, without the need to be accepted on xwiki-contrib, and that any
repository can be later moved under the xwiki-contrib umbrella. There are
still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving stuff from
http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them ASAP?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
11 Aug
11 Aug
7:35 p.m.
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
I moved everything under contrib/projects to xwiki-contrib, each project in
its own repository.
I moved everything under contrib/retired to a single big repository on
xwiki-contrib.
Things under contrib/people should be migrated by their owners.
I'm not sure what to do with the things in contrib/sandbox. Everything in
one big repository, or each project separated?
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
> There are still a few loose ends. For example
have we finished moving
stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them ASAP?
I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We
need to decide what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired
organization on github or simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention the
"retired" in a top level README?
12 Aug
12 Aug
11:32 a.m.
On Aug 11, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
I moved everything under contrib/projects to xwiki-contrib, each project in
its own repository.
I moved everything under contrib/retired to a single big repository on
xwiki-contrib.
Things under contrib/people should be migrated by their owners.
I'm not sure what to do with the things in contrib/sandbox. Everything in
one big repository, or each project separated?
big +1 for everything under a big repository and under xwiki-contrib.
That makes the most sense to me since:
* it makes it easy to find a location for it: xwiki-contrib/sandbox
* it shows a difference between "promoted" projects and sandbox ones
* it fits well since in sandbox projects don't need releases and thus don't need
their own repos
Thanks
-Vincent
> There are still a few loose ends. For example
have we finished moving
stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them ASAP?
I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We
need to decide what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired
organization on github or simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention the
"retired" in a top level README?
13 Aug
13 Aug
8:18 a.m.
On 08/12/2011 05:32 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
On Aug 11, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
Done.
All that remains in the contrib SVN repository is Jerome's Bespin
integration, waiting for him to move it out.
After that, the only active thing left in the whole SVN repository would
be Curriki, but I'm not sure they want to move yet.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Vincent
Massol<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
I moved everything under contrib/projects to xwiki-contrib, each project in
its own repository.
I moved everything under contrib/retired to a single big repository on
xwiki-contrib.
Things under contrib/people should be migrated by their owners.
I'm not sure what to do with the things in contrib/sandbox. Everything in
one big repository, or each project separated?
big +1 for everything under a big repository and under xwiki-contrib.
That makes the most sense to me since:
* it makes it easy to find a location for it: xwiki-contrib/sandbox
* it shows a difference between "promoted" projects and sandbox ones
* it fits well since in sandbox projects don't need releases and thus don't need
their own repos > There are still a few loose ends. For example
have we finished moving
stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them ASAP?
I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We
need to decide what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired
organization on github or simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention the
"retired" in a top level README?
10:30 a.m.
On Aug 13, 2011, at 8:18 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On 08/12/2011 05:32 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
What about retired/? (see my mail on the other thread about a proposal for that).
On Aug 11, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
Done.
All that remains in the contrib SVN repository is Jerome's Bespin
integration, waiting for him to move it out. On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Vincent
Massol<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
big +1 for everything under a big repository and under xwiki-contrib.
That makes the most sense to me since:
* it makes it easy to find a location for it: xwiki-contrib/sandbox
* it shows a difference between "promoted" projects and sandbox ones
* it fits well since in sandbox projects don't need releases and thus don't need
their own repos
>> There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving
stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
>
> Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them ASAP?
I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We
need to decide what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired
organization on github or simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention the
"retired" in a top level README?
I moved everything under contrib/projects to xwiki-contrib, each project in
its own repository.
I moved everything under contrib/retired to a single big repository on
xwiki-contrib.
Things under contrib/people should be migrated by their owners.
I'm not sure what to do with the things in contrib/sandbox. Everything in
one big repository, or each project separated? After that, the only active thing left in the whole
SVN repository would
be Curriki, but I'm not sure they want to move yet.
We still need to remove from the SVN repo stuff we've moved out.
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
12 Aug
12 Aug
11:46 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] Where do we put "retired" projects on GitHub? (was Re: Contrib project documentation update)
On Aug 11, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
I moved everything under contrib/projects to xwiki-contrib, each project in
its own repository.
I moved everything under contrib/retired to a single big repository on
xwiki-contrib.
Things under contrib/people should be migrated by their owners.
I'm not sure what to do with the things in contrib/sandbox. Everything in
one big repository, or each project separated?
There's also the question of where to put retired projects.
Right now I see only 2 options:
1) leave them in xwiki-contrib but add a README file at top level mentioning what
they've been replaced with
2) create a xwiki-retired organization and move retired projects there
Before we make a choice we need to agree on the definition of "retired".
Here's what I think it is:
- projects for which there's a new and better way of doing it
- projects that have not been active for a certain time (like the Attic in the ASF -
http://attic.apache.org/). Done with a VOTE on a case by case basis
If we choose 2) maybe we rename the org to xwiki-attic instead of xwiki-retried.
WDYT?
Personally I'm hesitating. If github had a better top level repo org I'd choose 1)
but seen the current way it's handled I think I'm slightly in favor of 2).
Thanks
-Vincent
> There are still a few loose ends. For example
have we finished moving
stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them ASAP?
I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We
need to decide what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired
organization on github or simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention the
"retired" in a top level README?
1:31 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] Where do we put "retired" projects on GitHub? (was Re: Contrib project documentation update)
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On Aug 11, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
+1 for 2) and I agree that it would have been better to have sub
organization or sub repository in github to have all the xwiki
repositories in the same place.
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
I moved everything under contrib/projects to xwiki-contrib, each project in
its own repository.
I moved everything under contrib/retired to a single big repository on
xwiki-contrib.
Things under contrib/people should be migrated by their owners.
I'm not sure what to do with the things in contrib/sandbox. Everything in
one big repository, or each project separated?
There's also the question of where to put retired projects.
Right now I see only 2 options:
1) leave them in xwiki-contrib but add a README file at top level mentioning what
they've been replaced with
2) create a xwiki-retired organization and move retired projects there
Before we make a choice we need to agree on the definition of "retired".
Here's what I think it is:
- projects for which there's a new and better way of doing it
- projects that have not been active for a certain time (like the Attic in the ASF -
http://attic.apache.org/). Done with a VOTE on a case by case basis
If we choose 2) maybe we rename the org to xwiki-attic instead of xwiki-retried.
WDYT?
Personally I'm hesitating. If github had a better top level repo org I'd choose
1) but seen the current way it's handled I think I'm slightly in favor of 2).
> There are still a few loose ends. For example
have we finished moving
stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them ASAP?
I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We
need to decide what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired
organization on github or simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention the
"retired" in a top level README?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
13 Aug
13 Aug
8:16 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] Where do we put "retired" projects on GitHub? (was Re: Contrib project documentation update)
On 08/12/2011 05:46 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
On Aug 11, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
For the moment I put them on xwiki-contrib, in a "retired" repository.
For the future, I agree that an xwiki-attic organization would be
better; still, I prefer to leave things as they are for the moment,
until we find something else to put there (old XWiki Workspaces, old
XWatch).
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Vincent
Massol<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
I moved everything under contrib/projects to xwiki-contrib, each project in
its own repository.
I moved everything under contrib/retired to a single big repository on
xwiki-contrib.
Things under contrib/people should be migrated by their owners.
I'm not sure what to do with the things in contrib/sandbox. Everything in
one big repository, or each project separated?
There's also the question of where to put retired projects.
Right now I see only 2 options:
1) leave them in xwiki-contrib but add a README file at top level mentioning what
they've been replaced with
2) create a xwiki-retired organization and move retired projects there
Before we make a choice we need to agree on the definition of "retired".
Here's what I think it is:
- projects for which there's a new and better way of doing it
- projects that have not been active for a certain time (like the Attic in the ASF -
http://attic.apache.org/). Done with a VOTE on a case by case basis
If we choose 2) maybe we rename the org to xwiki-attic instead of xwiki-retried.
WDYT?
Personally I'm hesitating. If github had a better top level repo org I'd choose
1) but seen the current way it's handled I think I'm slightly in favor of 2).
> There are still a few loose ends. For example
have we finished moving
stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them ASAP?
I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We
need to decide what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired
organization on github or simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention the
"retired" in a top level README?
6:34 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] Where do we put "retired" projects on GitHub? (was Re: Contrib project documentation update)
On Aug 13, 2011, at 8:16 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On 08/12/2011 05:46 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
ok but how do you handle branches/tags in a single repository for all retired projects?
Thanks
-Vincent
On Aug 11, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
For the moment I put them on xwiki-contrib, in a "retired" repository. On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Vincent
Massol<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
There's also the question of where to put retired projects.
Right now I see only 2 options:
1) leave them in xwiki-contrib but add a README file at top level mentioning what
they've been replaced with
2) create a xwiki-retired organization and move retired projects there
Before we make a choice we need to agree on the definition of "retired".
Here's what I think it is:
- projects for which there's a new and better way of doing it
- projects that have not been active for a certain time (like the Attic in the ASF -
http://attic.apache.org/). Done with a VOTE on a case by case basis
If we choose 2) maybe we rename the org to xwiki-attic instead of xwiki-retried.
WDYT?
Personally I'm hesitating. If github had a better top level repo org I'd choose
1) but seen the current way it's handled I think I'm slightly in favor of 2).
>> There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving
stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
>
> Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them ASAP?
I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We
need to decide what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired
organization on github or simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention the
"retired" in a top level README?
I moved everything under contrib/projects to xwiki-contrib, each project in
its own repository.
I moved everything under contrib/retired to a single big repository on
xwiki-contrib.
Things under contrib/people should be migrated by their owners.
I'm not sure what to do with the things in contrib/sandbox. Everything in
one big repository, or each project separated?
For the future, I agree that an xwiki-attic organization would be
better; still, I prefer to leave things as they are for the moment,
until we find something else to put there (old XWiki Workspaces, old
XWatch).
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
12 Aug
12 Aug
2:17 p.m.
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
I moved everything under contrib/projects to xwiki-contrib, each project in
its own repository.
I moved everything under contrib/retired to a single big repository on
xwiki-contrib.
Things under contrib/people should be migrated by their owners.
I'm not sure what to do with the things in contrib/sandbox. Everything in
one big repository, or each project separated?
Ok for one sandbox repository, we can always move some of them later
to their own project and yes as Vincent said they don't really need to
be in separated repositories since we don't release them and they
don't have separated rights.
> There are still a few loose ends. For example
have we finished moving
stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them ASAP?
I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We
need to decide what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired
organization on github or simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention the
"retired" in a top level README?
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
7:47 p.m.
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>wrote;wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu
<sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
in
Not sure about it, but when moving them to their own repo (if needed), we
have to copy/paste outside of git and the history is lost, right?
Thanks,
Eduard
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
>
>
> >> There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving
> stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
> >
> > Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them
ASAP?
>
> I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We
> need to decide what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired
> organization on github or simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention
the
"retired" in a top level README?
I moved everything under contrib/projects to xwiki-contrib, each project its own repository.
I moved everything under contrib/retired to a single big repository on
xwiki-contrib.
Things under contrib/people should be migrated by their owners.
I'm not sure what to do with the things in contrib/sandbox. Everything in
one big repository, or each project separated?
Ok for one sandbox repository, we can always move some of them later
to their own project and yes as Vincent said they don't really need to
be in separated repositories since we don't release them and they
don't have separated rights.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
7:58 p.m.
On 08/12/2011 01:47 PM, Eduard Moraru wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>wrote;wrote:
No, git allows to extract a sub-path out of a repository with all its
history.
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Sergiu
Dumitriu<sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
in
Not sure about it, but when moving them to their own repo (if needed), we
have to copy/paste outside of git and the history is lost, right? On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Vincent
Massol<vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
>
>
>>> There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving
> stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
>>
>> Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them
ASAP?
>
> I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We
> need to decide what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired
> organization on github or simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention
the
"retired" in a top level README?
I moved everything under contrib/projects to xwiki-contrib, each project its own repository.
I moved everything under contrib/retired to a single big repository on
xwiki-contrib.
Things under contrib/people should be migrated by their owners.
I'm not sure what to do with the things in contrib/sandbox. Everything in
one big repository, or each project separated?
Ok for one sandbox repository, we can always move some of them later
to their own project Thanks,
Eduard
> and yes as Vincent said they don't really need to
> be in separated repositories since we don't release them and they
> don't have separated rights.
>
>>
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
4836
days inactive
4841
days old
16 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Eduard Moraru -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Thomas Mortagne -
Vincent Massol