6 Mar
2011
6 Mar
'11
8:54 p.m.
Hi,
Since we're starting the 3.0 cycle I think it's time to move the web modules to
use the org.xwiki groupId and package names.
It's not really normal for an open source project such as our to use the package of a
company (and that of a company that doesn't exist anymore... xpertnet has been
replaced by XWiki SAS a few years ago) and I don't think moving web modules to that
package/groupid is going to cause any important problems to anyone.
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
6 Mar
6 Mar
9:15 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Move web modue packages/groupid to org.xwiki instead of com.xpn
+1
web modules are the last remaining com.xpn packages ?
Jerome.
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi,
Since we're starting the 3.0 cycle I think it's time to move the web modules to
use the org.xwiki groupId and package names.
It's not really normal for an open source project such as our to use the package of a
company (and that of a company that doesn't exist anymore... xpertnet has been
replaced by XWiki SAS a few years ago) and I don't think moving web modules to that
package/groupid is going to cause any important problems to anyone.
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
9:37 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Move web modue packages/groupid to org.xwiki instead of com.xpn
On Mar 6, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Jerome Velociter wrote:
+1
web modules are the last remaining com.xpn packages ?
No there are still plugins but for those the best is probably to change the package when
they're replaced by components. I haven't really thought if users would be
impacted by a package change for plugins.
Thanks
-Vincent
Jerome.
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since we're starting the 3.0 cycle I think it's time to move the web modules
to use the org.xwiki groupId and package names.
>
> It's not really normal for an open source project such as our to use the package
of a company (and that of a company that doesn't exist anymore... xpertnet has been
replaced by XWiki SAS a few years ago) and I don't think moving web modules to that
package/groupid is going to cause any important problems to anyone.
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
7 Mar
7 Mar
10:32 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Move web modue packages/groupid to org.xwiki instead of com.xpn
Le 06/03/11 21:37, Vincent Massol a écrit :
On Mar 6, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Jerome Velociter wrote:
You just need to change xwiki.cfg.
If you change, I suggest you change ALL
So 0- to change only web
+1 to change all to org.xwiki
Ludovic
+1
web modules are the last remaining com.xpn packages ?
No there are still plugins
but for those the best is probably to change the package when they're replaced by
components. I haven't really thought if users would be impacted by a package change
for plugins.
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Ludovic Dubost
Blog: http://blog.ludovic.org/
XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com
Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost
Jerome.
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Vincent Massol<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since we're starting the 3.0 cycle I think it's time to move the web modules
to use the org.xwiki groupId and package names.
>
> It's not really normal for an open source project such as our to use the package
of a company (and that of a company that doesn't exist anymore... xpertnet has been
replaced by XWiki SAS a few years ago) and I don't think moving web modules to that
package/groupid is going to cause any important problems to anyone.
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
10:46 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Move web modue packages/groupid to org.xwiki instead of com.xpn
On Mar 7, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Ludovic Dubost wrote:
Le 06/03/11 21:37, Vincent Massol a écrit :
what do you need to change in xwiki.cfg?
Thanks
-Vincent
On Mar 6, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Jerome Velociter
wrote:
You just need to change xwiki.cfg. +1
web modules are the last remaining com.xpn packages ?
No there are still plugins
but for those the best is probably to change the package when they're replaced by
components. I haven't really thought if users would be impacted by a package change
for plugins.
If you change, I suggest you change ALL
So 0- to change only web
+1 to change all to org.xwiki
Ludovic
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>> Jerome.
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Vincent Massol<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Since we're starting the 3.0 cycle I think it's time to move the web
modules to use the org.xwiki groupId and package names.
>>>
>>> It's not really normal for an open source project such as our to use the
package of a company (and that of a company that doesn't exist anymore... xpertnet has
been replaced by XWiki SAS a few years ago) and I don't think moving web modules to
that package/groupid is going to cause any important problems to anyone.
>>>
>>> Here's my +1
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent
11:17 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Move web modue packages/groupid to org.xwiki instead of com.xpn
Le 07/03/11 10:46, Vincent Massol a écrit :
On Mar 7, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Ludovic Dubost wrote:
The references to the plugins. They have the full package name in them
Ludovic
Le 06/03/11 21:37, Vincent Massol a écrit :
what do you need to change in xwiki.cfg?
On Mar 6, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Jerome Velociter
wrote:
You just need to change xwiki.cfg. +1
web modules are the last remaining com.xpn packages ?
No there are still plugins
but for those the best is probably to change the package when they're replaced by
components. I haven't really thought if users would be impacted by a package change
for plugins.
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Ludovic Dubost
Blog: http://blog.ludovic.org/
XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com
Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost
If you change, I suggest you change ALL
So 0- to change only web
+1 to change all to org.xwiki
Ludovic
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>> Jerome.
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Vincent Massol<vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Since we're starting the 3.0 cycle I think it's time to move the web
modules to use the org.xwiki groupId and package names.
>>>
>>> It's not really normal for an open source project such as our to use the
package of a company (and that of a company that doesn't exist anymore... xpertnet has
been replaced by XWiki SAS a few years ago) and I don't think moving web modules to
that package/groupid is going to cause any important problems to anyone.
>>>
>>> Here's my +1
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
11:25 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Move web modue packages/groupid to org.xwiki instead of com.xpn
On Mar 7, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Ludovic Dubost wrote:
Le 07/03/11 10:46, Vincent Massol a écrit :
That's why I suggested to only changed web/ and not plugins... :)
-Vincent
On Mar 7, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Ludovic Dubost
wrote:
The references to the plugins. They have the full package name in them
Le 06/03/11 21:37, Vincent Massol a écrit :
what do you need to change in
xwiki.cfg? On Mar 6, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Jerome Velociter
wrote:
> +1
>
> web modules are the last remaining com.xpn packages ?
No there are still plugins but for those the best is probably to change the package when
they're replaced by components. I haven't really thought if users would be
impacted by a package change for plugins.
You just need to change xwiki.cfg. Ludovic
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>> If you change, I suggest you change ALL
>>
>> So 0- to change only web
>> +1 to change all to org.xwiki
>>
>> Ludovic
>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent
>>>
>>>> Jerome.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Vincent Massol<vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Since we're starting the 3.0 cycle I think it's time to move
the web modules to use the org.xwiki groupId and package names.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not really normal for an open source project such as our to
use the package of a company (and that of a company that doesn't exist anymore...
xpertnet has been replaced by XWiki SAS a few years ago) and I don't think moving web
modules to that package/groupid is going to cause any important problems to anyone.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's my +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> -Vincent
11:27 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Move web modue packages/groupid to org.xwiki instead of com.xpn
Le 07/03/11 11:25, Vincent Massol a écrit :
On Mar 7, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Ludovic Dubost wrote:
I don't find it a big
change. You just need to document it.
At some point we should make the change so do it
Ludovic
Le 07/03/11 10:46, Vincent Massol a écrit :
That's
why I suggested to only changed web/ and not plugins... :) On Mar 7, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Ludovic Dubost
wrote:
The references to the plugins. They have the full package name in them Le 06/03/11 21:37, Vincent Massol a écrit :
> On Mar 6, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Jerome Velociter wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> web modules are the last remaining com.xpn packages ?
> No there are still plugins but for those the best is probably to change the package
when they're replaced by components. I haven't really thought if users would be
impacted by a package change for plugins.
>
You just need to change xwiki.cfg.
what do you need to change in xwiki.cfg? -Vincent
--
Ludovic Dubost
Blog: http://blog.ludovic.org/
XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com
Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost
Ludovic
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>> If you change, I suggest you change ALL
>>
>> So 0- to change only web
>> +1 to change all to org.xwiki
>>
>> Ludovic
>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent
>>>
>>>> Jerome.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Vincent Massol<vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Since we're starting the 3.0 cycle I think it's time to move
the web modules to use the org.xwiki groupId and package names.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not really normal for an open source project such as our to
use the package of a company (and that of a company that doesn't exist anymore...
xpertnet has been replaced by XWiki SAS a few years ago) and I don't think moving web
modules to that package/groupid is going to cause any important problems to anyone.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's my +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> -Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
2:07 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Move web modue packages/groupid to org.xwiki instead of com.xpn
On 03/06/2011 08:54 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi,
Since we're starting the 3.0 cycle I think it's time to move the web modules to
use the org.xwiki groupId and package names.
It's not really normal for an open source project such as our to use the package of a
company (and that of a company that doesn't exist anymore... xpertnet has been
replaced by XWiki SAS a few years ago) and I don't think moving web modules to that
package/groupid is going to cause any important problems to anyone.
Here's my +1
+1.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
8:30 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Move web modue packages/groupid to org.xwiki instead of com.xpn
+1
Thanks,
Marius
On 03/06/2011 09:54 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi,
Since we're starting the 3.0 cycle I think it's time to move the web modules to
use the org.xwiki groupId and package names.
It's not really normal for an open source project such as our to use the package of a
company (and that of a company that doesn't exist anymore... xpertnet has been
replaced by XWiki SAS a few years ago) and I don't think moving web modules to that
package/groupid is going to cause any important problems to anyone.
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
8:35 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Move web modue packages/groupid to org.xwiki instead of com.xpn
+1
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 20:54, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi,
Since we're starting the 3.0 cycle I think it's time to move the web modules to
use the org.xwiki groupId and package names.
It's not really normal for an open source project such as our to use the package of a
company (and that of a company that doesn't exist anymore... xpertnet has been
replaced by XWiki SAS a few years ago) and I don't think moving web modules to that
package/groupid is going to cause any important problems to anyone.
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
5039
days inactive
5040
days old
10 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Jerome Velociter -
Ludovic Dubost -
Marius Dumitru Florea -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Thomas Mortagne -
Vincent Massol