26 Nov
2014
26 Nov
'14
2:21 p.m.
Hi,
We have discussed this subject multiple times, but we don't have an
official vote and conclusion on the topic.
Problem: In JIRA who is the Assignee of an issue fixed by a Pull Request?
1: Contributor
- he provided the solution
- giving the attributions, the contributor might feel encouraged to
contribute more
- we could do some JIRA statistics on external contributions, but this use
case can be covered by GitHub statistics
2: Committer
- he does the merging on his account and he becomes responsible for the
committed code.
- in case there are problems, the committer needs to find solution, since
we can't rely on contributors availability
- in doing the PR review, the committer spends a lot of time analyzing and
testing the provided solution
We are talking here about complete solutions provided by the PR, since in
case of partial solutions, the committer can assign himself on the issue
(depends on the quantity of modification he does).
Let me know what you think,
Caty
26 Nov
26 Nov
2:31 p.m.
+1 for Contributor
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
<valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
We have discussed this subject multiple times, but we don't have an
official vote and conclusion on the topic.
Problem: In JIRA who is the Assignee of an issue fixed by a Pull Request?
1: Contributor
- he provided the solution
- giving the attributions, the contributor might feel encouraged to
contribute more
- we could do some JIRA statistics on external contributions, but this use
case can be covered by GitHub statistics
2: Committer
- he does the merging on his account and he becomes responsible for the
committed code.
- in case there are problems, the committer needs to find solution, since
we can't rely on contributors availability
- in doing the PR review, the committer spends a lot of time analyzing and
testing the provided solution
We are talking here about complete solutions provided by the PR, since in
case of partial solutions, the committer can assign himself on the issue
(depends on the quantity of modification he does).
Let me know what you think,
Caty
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
2:44 p.m.
On 26 Nov 2014 at 14:21:48, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
(valicac@gmail.com(mailto:valicac@gmail.com)) wrote:
Hi,
We have discussed this subject multiple times, but we don't have an
official vote and conclusion on the topic.
Problem: In JIRA who is the Assignee of an issue fixed by a Pull Request?
1: Contributor
- he provided the solution
- giving the attributions, the contributor might feel encouraged to
contribute more
- we could do some JIRA statistics on external contributions, but this use
case can be covered by GitHub statistics
2: Committer
- he does the merging on his account and he becomes responsible for the
committed code.
- in case there are problems, the committer needs to find solution, since
we can't rely on contributors availability
- in doing the PR review, the committer spends a lot of time analyzing and
testing the provided solution
We are talking here about complete solutions provided by the PR, since in
case of partial solutions, the committer can assign himself on the issue
(depends on the quantity of modification he does).
Let me know what you think,
It’s not easy to decide. Naturally I’m more tempted by solution 2 (committer) because it’s
usually overall more work from the committer part (review, fix problems and maintain over
the long run) and he’s taking the responsibility for it (in case it leads to problems he’s
one who’s going to have to fix it and take the heat - he can try pushing it back to the
contributor but it may or may not work ;)). Also handling a PR is some work for committers
(we have a lot of open issues with PRs that prove this!) and it’s good that the committer
is “rewarded" by being the assignee in jira too.
Note that the contributor is also already rewarded in the commit history on github and on
our Hall of Fame on xwiki.org.
Now I’m not going to oppose 1 if everyone believes it’s better. If we do 1 we’ll just need
to put clearly in the Committership page on xwiki.org the part about the responsibility
when applying PRs.
Thanks
-Vincent
Caty
2:56 p.m.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:44 PM, vincent(a)massol.net <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On 26 Nov 2014 at 14:21:48, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
(valicac@gmail.com(mailto:valicac@gmail.com)) wrote:
Hi,
We have discussed this subject multiple times, but we don't have an
official vote and conclusion on the topic.
Problem: In JIRA who is the Assignee of an issue fixed by a Pull Request?
1: Contributor
- he provided the solution
- giving the attributions, the contributor might feel encouraged to
contribute more
- we could do some JIRA statistics on external contributions, but this use
case can be covered by GitHub statistics
2: Committer
- he does the merging on his account and he becomes responsible for the
committed code.
- in case there are problems, the committer needs to find solution, since
we can't rely on contributors availability
- in doing the PR review, the committer spends a lot of time analyzing and
testing the provided solution
We are talking here about complete solutions provided by the PR, since in
case of partial solutions, the committer can assign himself on the issue
(depends on the quantity of modification he does).
Let me know what you think,
It’s not easy to decide. Naturally I’m more tempted by
solution 2 (committer) because it’s usually overall more work from the committer part
(review, fix problems and maintain over the long run) and he’s taking the responsibility
for it (in case it leads to problems he’s one who’s going to have to fix it and take the
heat - he can try pushing it back to the contributor but it may or may not work ;)). Also
handling a PR is some work for committers (we have a lot of open issues with PRs that
prove this!) and it’s good that the committer is “rewarded" by being the assignee in
jira too.
This is also true if the committer is no longer available or if he is
busy with some other module/task. And anyway, if the time passed since
the issue was closed is long enough to make the Contributor
unavailable then that issue is probably closed and released so we need
to open another issue which will have a different assignee.
Note that the contributor is also already rewarded in the commit history on github and on
our Hall of Fame on xwiki.org.
Now I’m not going to oppose 1 if everyone believes it’s better. If we do 1 we’ll just
need to put clearly in the Committership page on xwiki.org the part about the
responsibility when applying PRs.
Thanks
-Vincent
Caty
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs 
3:13 p.m.
Hi,
Well, my initial reaction was also to go for Option 2, because the issue
tracker is not the right place to give credit, it's temporary and that the
code's commit history and PRs is the way to accept people's contributions
and give credit.
However, for the sake of trying to motivate people and have more
contributors/committers (and we need that more IMO than anything else), I`m
voting for Option 1, with the mention that we can have cases when the
author of an accepted PR does not have a jira account so then the committer
closing the issue is forced to assign himself and probably add a comment
saying that the applied the PR authored by X.
Thanks,
Eduard
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:44 PM, vincent(a)massol.net <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
On 26 Nov 2014 at 14:21:48, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) (valicac(a)gmail.com
(mailto:valicac@gmail.com)) wrote:
Hi,
We have discussed this subject multiple times, but we don't have an
official vote and conclusion on the topic.
Problem: In JIRA who is the Assignee of an issue fixed by a Pull Request?
1: Contributor
- he provided the solution
- giving the attributions, the contributor might feel encouraged to
contribute more
- we could do some JIRA statistics on external contributions, but this
use
case can be covered by GitHub statistics
2: Committer
- he does the merging on his account and he becomes responsible for the
committed code.
- in case there are problems, the committer needs to find solution, since
we can't rely on contributors availability
- in doing the PR review, the committer spends a lot of time analyzing
and
testing the provided solution
We are talking here about complete solutions provided by the PR, since in
case of partial solutions, the committer can assign himself on the issue
(depends on the quantity of modification he does).
Let me know what you think,
It’s not easy to decide. Naturally I’m more tempted by solution 2
(committer) because it’s usually overall more work from the committer part
(review, fix problems and maintain over the long run) and he’s taking the
responsibility for it (in case it leads to problems he’s one who’s going to
have to fix it and take the heat - he can try pushing it back to the
contributor but it may or may not work ;)). Also handling a PR is some work
for committers (we have a lot of open issues with PRs that prove this!) and
it’s good that the committer is “rewarded" by being the assignee in jira
too.
Note that the contributor is also already rewarded in the commit history
on github and on our Hall of Fame on xwiki.org.
Now I’m not going to oppose 1 if everyone believes it’s better. If we do 1
we’ll just need to put clearly in the Committership page on xwiki.org the
part about the responsibility when applying PRs.
Thanks
-Vincent
Caty
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
2:44 p.m.
+0
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 03:21:06PM +0200, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote:
Hi,
We have discussed this subject multiple times, but we don't have an
official vote and conclusion on the topic.
Problem: In JIRA who is the Assignee of an issue fixed by a Pull Request?
1: Contributor
- he provided the solution
- giving the attributions, the contributor might feel encouraged to
contribute more
- we could do some JIRA statistics on external contributions, but this use
case can be covered by GitHub statistics
2: Committer
- he does the merging on his account and he becomes responsible for the
committed code.
- in case there are problems, the committer needs to find solution, since
we can't rely on contributors availability
- in doing the PR review, the committer spends a lot of time analyzing and
testing the provided solution
We are talking here about complete solutions provided by the PR, since in
case of partial solutions, the committer can assign himself on the issue
(depends on the quantity of modification he does).
Let me know what you think,
Caty
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Jean Simard
jean.simard(a)xwiki.com
Research engineer at XWiki SAS
http://www.xwiki.com
Committer on the XWiki.org project
http://www.xwiki.org
2:57 p.m.
I'm +1 for Contributor (if the PR is complete).
Is kind of the committer's job to do the PR review and although this is
hard work :) encouraging the contributor in making more PRs and maybe then
voting him as committer is a nice strategy.
We can always see in the Commits tab who did the merge.
Thanks,
Caty
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Jean SIMARD <jean.simard(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
+0
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 03:21:06PM +0200, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote:
Hi,
We have discussed this subject multiple times, but we don't have an
official vote and conclusion on the topic.
Problem: In JIRA who is the Assignee of an issue fixed by a Pull Request?
1: Contributor
- he provided the solution
- giving the attributions, the contributor might feel encouraged to
contribute more
- we could do some JIRA statistics on external contributions, but this
use
case can be covered by GitHub statistics
2: Committer
- he does the merging on his account and he becomes responsible for the
committed code.
- in case there are problems, the committer needs to find solution, since
we can't rely on contributors availability
- in doing the PR review, the committer spends a lot of time analyzing
and
testing the provided solution
We are talking here about complete solutions provided by the PR, since in
case of partial solutions, the committer can assign himself on the issue
(depends on the quantity of modification he does).
Let me know what you think,
Caty
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Jean Simard
jean.simard(a)xwiki.com
Research engineer at XWiki SAS
http://www.xwiki.com
Committer on the XWiki.org project
http://www.xwiki.org
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
3:20 p.m.
+1 for contributor (If I'm allow to vote ;-) )
because identify/isolate issue + create/describe issue on jira + screenshot AND find patch
+ test (almost) all usercaset + PR taking time and effort too :-)
Pascal B (a tiny contributor) :-)
De : Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <valicac(a)gmail.com>
À : XWiki Developers <devs(a)xwiki.org>
Envoyé le : Mercredi 26 novembre 2014 14h57
Objet : Re: [xwiki-devs] [Vote] Assignee for PR: Contributor or Committer?
I'm +1 for Contributor (if the PR is complete).
Is kind of the committer's job to do the PR review and although this is
hard work :) encouraging the contributor in making more PRs and maybe then
voting him as committer is a nice strategy.
We can always see in the Commits tab who did the merge.
Thanks,
Caty
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Jean SIMARD <jean.simard(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
+0
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 03:21:06PM +0200, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote:
Hi,
We have discussed this subject multiple times, but we don't have an
official vote and conclusion on the topic.
Problem: In JIRA who is the Assignee of an issue fixed by a Pull Request?
1: Contributor
- he provided the solution
- giving the attributions, the contributor might feel encouraged to
contribute more
- we could do some JIRA statistics on external contributions, but this
use
case can be covered by GitHub statistics
2: Committer
- he does the merging on his account and he becomes responsible for the
committed code.
- in case there are problems, the committer needs to find solution, since
we can't rely on contributors availability
- in doing the PR review, the committer spends a lot of time analyzing
and
testing the provided solution
We are talking here about complete solutions provided by the PR, since in
case of partial solutions, the committer can assign himself on the issue
(depends on the quantity of modification he does).
Let me know what you think,
Caty
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Jean Simard
jean.simard(a)xwiki.com
Research engineer at XWiki SAS
http://www.xwiki.com
Committer on the XWiki.org project
http://www.xwiki.org _______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
4:24 p.m.
This is not the first time we discuss that I had the impression it was
ok for everyone to put 1: contributor.
It's very easy to know what committer applied the pull request and I
feel that the issue should be assigned to who actually fixed/done what
is described, there is never too much contribution rewards.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
<valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
We have discussed this subject multiple times, but we don't have an
official vote and conclusion on the topic.
Problem: In JIRA who is the Assignee of an issue fixed by a Pull Request?
1: Contributor
- he provided the solution
- giving the attributions, the contributor might feel encouraged to
contribute more
- we could do some JIRA statistics on external contributions, but this use
case can be covered by GitHub statistics
2: Committer
- he does the merging on his account and he becomes responsible for the
committed code.
- in case there are problems, the committer needs to find solution, since
we can't rely on contributors availability
- in doing the PR review, the committer spends a lot of time analyzing and
testing the provided solution
We are talking here about complete solutions provided by the PR, since in
case of partial solutions, the committer can assign himself on the issue
(depends on the quantity of modification he does).
Let me know what you think,
Caty
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
6:39 p.m.
+1 for 1.
On 11/26/2014 08:21 AM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote:
Hi,
We have discussed this subject multiple times, but we don't have an
official vote and conclusion on the topic.
Problem: In JIRA who is the Assignee of an issue fixed by a Pull Request?
1: Contributor
- he provided the solution
- giving the attributions, the contributor might feel encouraged to
contribute more
- we could do some JIRA statistics on external contributions, but this use
case can be covered by GitHub statistics
2: Committer
- he does the merging on his account and he becomes responsible for the
committed code.
- in case there are problems, the committer needs to find solution, since
we can't rely on contributors availability
- in doing the PR review, the committer spends a lot of time analyzing and
testing the provided solution
We are talking here about complete solutions provided by the PR, since in
case of partial solutions, the committer can assign himself on the issue
(depends on the quantity of modification he does).
Let me know what you think,
Caty
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
2 Dec
2 Dec
12:52 p.m.
Hi,
Vote 1: Contributor received 5 +1 binding, and 1 +1 non binding votes.
Thanks for your votes.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.org> wrote:
+1 for 1.
On 11/26/2014 08:21 AM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote:
Hi,
We have discussed this subject multiple times, but we don't have an
official vote and conclusion on the topic.
Problem: In JIRA who is the Assignee of an issue fixed by a Pull Request?
1: Contributor
- he provided the solution
- giving the attributions, the contributor might feel encouraged to
contribute more
- we could do some JIRA statistics on external contributions, but this
use
case can be covered by GitHub statistics
2: Committer
- he does the merging on his account and he becomes responsible for the
committed code.
- in case there are problems, the committer needs to find solution, since
we can't rely on contributors availability
- in doing the PR review, the committer spends a lot of time analyzing
and
testing the provided solution
We are talking here about complete solutions provided by the PR, since in
case of partial solutions, the committer can assign himself on the issue
(depends on the quantity of modification he does).
Let me know what you think,
Caty
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
7 May
7 May
4:16 p.m.
Hi,
We forgot to document it so I’ve put it at
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/DevelopmentPractices#HRule:As…
Also note that several use cases were missing so I’ve added some too, please verify
they’re ok for you:
* no jira account
* substantial rewrite of the PR
Thanks
-Vincent
On 2 Dec 2014, at 12:52, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
<valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Vote 1: Contributor received 5 +1 binding, and 1 +1 non binding votes.
Thanks for your votes.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.org> wrote:
+1 for 1.
On 11/26/2014 08:21 AM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote:
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs Hi,
We have discussed this subject multiple times, but we don't have an
official vote and conclusion on the topic.
Problem: In JIRA who is the Assignee of an issue fixed by a Pull Request?
1: Contributor
- he provided the solution
- giving the attributions, the contributor might feel encouraged to
contribute more
- we could do some JIRA statistics on external contributions, but this
use
case can be covered by GitHub statistics
2: Committer
- he does the merging on his account and he becomes responsible for the
committed code.
- in case there are problems, the committer needs to find solution, since
we can't rely on contributors availability
- in doing the PR review, the committer spends a lot of time analyzing
and
testing the provided solution
We are talking here about complete solutions provided by the PR, since in
case of partial solutions, the committer can assign himself on the issue
(depends on the quantity of modification he does).
Let me know what you think,
Caty
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
2315
days inactive
3573
days old
11 comments
9 participants
participants (9)
-
Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) -
Eduard Moraru -
Jean SIMARD -
Marius Dumitru Florea -
Pascal BASTIEN -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Thomas Mortagne -
Vincent Massol -
vincent＠massol.net