9 Mar
2007
9 Mar
'07
7 p.m.
Hi committers,
I propose we adopt the SVN configuration from the Maven project.
Right now everyone has his own config which is a pain for several
reasons:
- line encodings are different. For example in Jeremi's commit all
the lines of XWikiMessageTool were modified even though he only
touched a few lines.
- expansion of @version $Id: $
- correct mime types
Here's the file I propose to use: http://maven.apache.org/developers/
svn-eol-style.txt
This is from http://maven.apache.org/developers/committer-
environment.html
If everyone agrees, please install it in your .subversion/ directory
(on unix) and somewhere in your profile under Subversion/ on windows.
I'll also put it up on xwiki.org
Thanks
-Vincent
10 Mar
10 Mar
12:52 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-dev] [Proposal] Subversion configuration
For what purpose we need svn:keywords="Author Date Id Revision" properties?:
xwiki/trunk/web/standard/src/main/resources/hibernate.cfg.xml
Name: svn:keywords
+ "Author Date Id Revision"
Vincent Massol wrote:
Here's the file I propose to use:
http://maven.apache.org/developers/svn-eol-style.txt
This is from http://maven.apache.org/developers/committer-environment.html
If everyone agrees, please install it in your .subversion/ directory (on
unix) and somewhere in your profile under Subversion/ on windows. I'll
also put it up on xwiki.org
--
Artem Melentyev, UralSU, CS401
11 Mar
11 Mar
10:30 p.m.
New subject: Should we use SVN keyword expansion? (was Re: [xwiki-dev] [Proposal] Subversion configuration)
On Mar 10, 2007, at 12:52 AM, Artem Melentyev wrote:
For what purpose we need svn:keywords="Author
Date Id Revision"
properties?:
To expand svn keywords in source files (especially the "@version $Id:
$" part). Why do we need this?
To be honest I'm not sure. I've always done and never questioned it
so I guess now is the right time to do so... :)
Pros I can think of:
- it allows us to distribute sources and if someone modifies it we
can know what version of the source they're using
Cons I can think of:
- more work, developers need to have keyword expansion set in their
subversion config file (although we would need subversion config
anyway for eol, mimetypes, etc)
- for developers, duplicates the information in SVN. It's mostly
possibly interesting for users and even then it's not sure
Note: in Svn the files are stored in the repo without the expansion;
it's only on checkout that the expansion happens.
Thus after more thought, I'm more tempted to say we don't need them
and that we should remove all the @version I've added here and then
(I'll do it of course should we agree to not use keyword expansion).
Thanks
-Vincent
10:38 p.m.
New subject: Should we use SVN keyword expansion? (was Re: [xwiki-dev] [Proposal] Subversion configuration)
I don't really understand how this works. If on checkout $version $ is
expanded, what gets commited back? $version $ or the actual number?
On 3/11/07, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On Mar 10, 2007, at 12:52 AM, Artem Melentyev wrote:
--
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
For what purpose we need
svn:keywords="Author Date Id Revision"
properties?:
To expand svn keywords in source files (especially the "@version $Id:
$" part). Why do we need this?
To be honest I'm not sure. I've always done and never questioned it
so I guess now is the right time to do so... :)
Pros I can think of:
- it allows us to distribute sources and if someone modifies it we
can know what version of the source they're using
Cons I can think of:
- more work, developers need to have keyword expansion set in their
subversion config file (although we would need subversion config
anyway for eol, mimetypes, etc)
- for developers, duplicates the information in SVN. It's mostly
possibly interesting for users and even then it's not sure
Note: in Svn the files are stored in the repo without the expansion;
it's only on checkout that the expansion happens.
Thus after more thought, I'm more tempted to say we don't need them
and that we should remove all the @version I've added here and then
(I'll do it of course should we agree to not use keyword expansion).
Thanks
-Vincent
10:44 p.m.
New subject: Should we use SVN keyword expansion? (was Re: [xwiki-dev] [Proposal] Subversion configuration)
On Mar 11, 2007, at 10:38 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
I don't really understand how this works. If on
checkout $version $
is expanded, what gets commited back? $version $ or the actual number?
@version $Id: $
i.e. no expansion
-Vincent
On 3/11/07, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
On Mar 10, 2007, at 12:52 AM, Artem Melentyev wrote:
For what purpose we need
svn:keywords="Author Date Id Revision"
properties?:
To expand svn keywords in source files (especially the "@version $Id:
$" part). Why do we need this?
To be honest I'm not sure. I've always done and never questioned it
so I guess now is the right time to do so... :)
Pros I can think of:
- it allows us to distribute sources and if someone modifies it we
can know what version of the source they're using
Cons I can think of:
- more work, developers need to have keyword expansion set in their
subversion config file (although we would need subversion config
anyway for eol, mimetypes, etc)
- for developers, duplicates the information in SVN. It's mostly
possibly interesting for users and even then it's not sure
Note: in Svn the files are stored in the repo without the expansion;
it's only on checkout that the expansion happens.
Thus after more thought, I'm more tempted to say we don't need them
and that we should remove all the @version I've added here and then
(I'll do it of course should we agree to not use keyword expansion).
Thanks
-Vincent
--
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
--
You receive this message as a subscriber of the xwiki-
dev(a)objectweb.org mailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto:xwiki-dev-unsubscribe@objectweb.org
For general help: mailto:sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help
ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/
wws 
12 Mar
12 Mar
5:29 a.m.
New subject: Should we use SVN keyword expansion? (was Re: [xwiki-dev] [Proposal] Subversion configuration)
Also I don't really understand how this works, but I'll do it if it is
necessary for us :-)
On 3/12/07, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On Mar 11, 2007, at 10:38 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
I don't really understand how this works. If on checkout $version $ is
expanded, what gets commited back? $version $ or the actual number?
@version $Id: $
i.e. no expansion
-Vincent
On 3/11/07, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On Mar 10, 2007, at 12:52 AM, Artem Melentyev wrote:
--
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
--
You receive this message as a subscriber of the xwiki-dev(a)objectweb.orgmailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto:xwiki-dev-unsubscribe@objectweb.org
<xwiki-dev-unsubscribe(a)objectweb.org>
For general help:
mailto:sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help<sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help>
ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws
--
You receive this message as a subscriber of the xwiki-dev(a)objectweb.orgmailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto: xwiki-dev-unsubscribe(a)objectweb.org
For general help: mailto: sympa(a)objectweb.org?subject=help
ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws
For what purpose we need
svn:keywords="Author Date Id Revision"
properties?:
To expand svn keywords in source files (especially the "@version $Id:
$" part). Why do we need this?
To be honest I'm not sure. I've always done and never questioned it
so I guess now is the right time to do so... :)
Pros I can think of:
- it allows us to distribute sources and if someone modifies it we
can know what version of the source they're using
Cons I can think of:
- more work, developers need to have keyword expansion set in their
subversion config file (although we would need subversion config
anyway for eol, mimetypes, etc)
- for developers, duplicates the information in SVN. It's mostly
possibly interesting for users and even then it's not sure
Note: in Svn the files are stored in the repo without the expansion;
it's only on checkout that the expansion happens.
Thus after more thought, I'm more tempted to say we don't need them
and that we should remove all the @version I've added here and then
(I'll do it of course should we agree to not use keyword expansion).
Thanks
-Vincent
6398
days inactive
6401
days old
5 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Artem Melentyev -
Phung Nam -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Vincent Massol