Thanks,
Caty
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Guillaume Delhumeau <
guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
+1 for integrating templates.
"Article" is like a blog post man while "Encyclopedia" integrates a
table
on the right to describe an object or something. Their objective are
different. But if we decide to keep only one of them, I would be OK
(Encyclopedia being my favorite).
2016-07-12 13:55 GMT+02:00 Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>et>:
> On 12 Jul 2016, at 13:48, Eduard Moraru <enygma2002(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
> valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ideally we should make the templates independent and have a dedicated
>> section in e.x.o.
>> Users could browse and install them separate.
>>
>> We should also monitor what templates are interesting and which are
not
>> (although this is a bit hard to do right
now).
>>
>> Of course I also consider we could have better templates or diverse,
but
> this
is not the point now.
> The point is to add some templates and better show this feature. Since
we
>> are very generic it's hard to tell what templates each category of
users
> would
need. That's why it would be better for them to select them, but
they
> should be aware that they have this
possibility.
>
> So currently the vote is favorable. I'm waiting until tomorrow so see
if
we
> have any blockers.
>
> Still not sure about how we should implement them best: in platform or
in
e.x.o? As
a package or separate?
My preference goes towards a templates package, for start, in contrib,
that
is included in the default flavor.
I think I agree. We need to close the last discussion thread about the
scope for the xwiki github org and about platform. Right now the
consensus
seems to be:
* the default platform distribution’s goal is to provide a basic working
wiki
* XE’s goal (and in the future another named flavor) is to provide a
full-fledged second generation wiki.
* Non core features go in contrib and generic ones are included in the XE
flavor
Thanks
-Vincent
Thanks,
Eduard
>
> Thanks,
> Caty
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Eduard Moraru <enygma2002(a)gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> +1, generally.
>>>
>>> I also feel a bit frustrated by the seeming redundancy of having both
>>> Article and Encyclopedia on one side and Meeting Report and Simple
page
>>
onthe other, since from a helicopter view they are 95% identical.
> However,
>> I believe that the whole point of templates is to have a very
specialized
>> usecase that is answered and that the
user can immediately use. If
every
>> time someone wants a simple page, but
selects meeting notes and
removes a
>> lot of formatting, then they will just
end up creating a simple page
>> template.
>>
>> These are just a couple of usages that we consider to be very common
and
>>> which we decide to offer some help by default (in the default
flavor).
>>> Others could be added (even from
Caty`s extended list), since we`re
>> missing
>>> tables, macros and many other useful XWiki features that are
otherwise
>> hard
>>> to discover.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Eduard
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Alexandru Cotiuga <
>>> alexandru.cotiuga(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> + 1 for all
>>>> The difference between Article and Encyclopedia could be increased
by
>>>> adding other specific elements
on each one's layout.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Alex
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
>>>> valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In case we don't like a particular Template, then the best
strategy
>> is
>>> to
>>>>> have individual votes for them.
>>>>>
>>>>> @Anca, from your feedback is hard to know if you prefer Article
over
>>>>> Encyclopedia.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since we need to release 8.2 final at the end of the week I would
>> like
>>> to
>>>>> advance with this topic: either by committing all the proposed
>>> templates
>>>> or
>>>>> just a subset, but I need more opinions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Status:
>>>>> 1. Article (Article page): +1 Vincent, +1 Caty
>>>>> 2. Encyclopedia (Encyclopedia page): +1 Vincent, +1 Caty
>>>>> 3. Meeting Report (Agenda and notes): 1+ Vincent, +1 Caty, +1 Anca
>>>>> 4. Simple Page (With table of content): +1 Vincent, +1 Caty, +1
Anca
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Caty
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Anca Luca <lucaa(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
>>>>> valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Anca Luca
<lucaa(a)xwiki.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello Caty,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
<
>>>>>>> valicac(a)gmail.com
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> By default there are not many page templates an user
could
> see.
>>>>>>>> In order for users to understand the power and purpose
of
>> XWiki,
>>> it
>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>> be helpful to add more content templates by default.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Content Templates are templates that don't belong to
a
>> particular
>>>>>>>> application, but provides an initial content structure.
The
>>>> templates
>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>> be suggested in the creation step.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here are some templates we could add by default:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/TemplatesDefault#HProposal
>>>>>>>>> 1. Article
>>>>>>>>> 2. Encyclopedia
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think these two are the same one, they should be
collapsed
>> into
>>>>> only
>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>> template. I don't really understand the differences
between
>> these
>>>>> two.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The differences are in layout.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In my opinion this is not enough to have both of them. For me,
the
>>> goal
>>>>> of
>>>>>> the templates by default is to help discover the template
feature
>> and
>>>> its
>>>>>> benefits to users, and the way to do that would be to show
>>> interesting
>>>>>> usecases of the template feature. Having two templates for the
same
>>>>> usecase
>>>>>> but with different layout is not aligned with this goal, but
would
>> be
>>>>> more
>>>>>> aligned with the goal of showing that we can do different fancy
>>>> layouts.
>>>>> In
>>>>>> addition, this logic would allow to have multiple templates for
the
>>> other
>>>>> usecases as well, with different layout, which would not be a good
>> idea
>>>>> (e.g. another meeting report, with a different layout) because
> would
>>>> bloat
>>>>> the list...
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone else?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Anca
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 3. Meeting
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Should be called Meeting Report (or meeting notes), so that
the
>>>>>> difference
>>>>>>> with the meeting extension is more obvious.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will use "Meeting Report"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 4. Simple Page
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Should have the word Table of Contents in the name, so that
its
>>>> purpose
>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> obvious from the start (otherwise "simple page" and
the default
>>>> "blank
>>>>>>> page" are not very easy to differentiate ).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> The difference is viewed in the Description, see
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Proposal/TemplatesDefault/WebHom…
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Caty
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Another template could be added, "Index page", with
a simple
>>>> livetable
>>>>>>> listing all the children (and descendants) pages of the
current
>>> page.
>>>>>> It's
>>>>>>> handy when creating the root page of a subtree on the wiki
> (would
>>>> have
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> same purpose as "Dashboard", to be a scripted
homepage from
> where
>>> the
>>>>>>> subtree of that page can be accessed).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Anca
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You can test them on
>>>>>>>>
>>>
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/TemplatesDefault/
>>>>> (use
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> Create button)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please vote if you agree these templates should be added
by
>>> default
>>>>> or
>>>>>>>> otherwise let me know your feedback.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Caty
>>>>>>>> _________
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Guillaume Delhumeau (guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the
XWiki.org project
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs