Hi Vincent, +1 Thanks, Adel On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:07 AM Marius Dumitru Florea <mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote: > > +1 > > Thanks, > Marius > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 11:04 AM Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote: > > > Hi devs, > > > > We now have > > https://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/ServletContainerSupportStrat… > > but it’s not precise enough. > > > > I’m proposing the following: > > > > * Mention the supported version cycle and mention that we support the > > latest version of the cycle. > > * For Tomcat, I propose to say we support Tomcat 8.x (which means Tomcat > > 8.5.34 as of today, see “latest” tag on https://hub.docker.com/_/tomcat/)

> > * For Jetty (standalone packaging or standard), I propose to say we > > support Jetty 9.x (which means Jetty 9.4.12 as of today, see “latest” tag > > on https://hub.docker.com/_/jetty/) > > > > WDYT? > > > > Thanks > > -Vincent > > > > > >

On 31 Oct 2018, at 10:44, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote: This is listed on https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Documentation/AdminGuide/Installation/…

Thanks -Vincent

On 31 Oct 2018, at 10:53, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote: I know but it should also be on the support page IMO.

On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:44 AM Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote: -- Thomas Mortagne

On 31 Oct 2018, at 14:59, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote: + 1 to have: Tomcat 8.5.x Jetty 9.x Not sure why we have 2 entries for Jetty. If we want to provide 2 Installation links, then we should have 2 links inside the "Installation Instructions" column, but not sure we need 2 rows for Jetty. It's confusing.

Thanks, Caty On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 11:57 AM Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote: > > >> On 31 Oct 2018, at 10:53, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> > wrote: >> >> I know but it should also be on the support page IMO. > > I prefer to have it in a single place (no dup). We could link to it > though. Right now the flow is that you find the requirements first and then > this is from there that you find the support pages. > > But I’m not against linking in the 2 directions. What’s important for me > is that all requirements are listed on > https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Documentation/AdminGuide/Installation/… > since that’s the main place. > > Thanks > -Vincent > >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:44 AM Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> > wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On 31 Oct 2018, at 10:42, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> > wrote: >>>> >>>> Actually there is another very important thing missing in that page: >>>> we should also indicate explicitly the minimum version of the Servlet >>>> API required by XWiki (currently 3.0.1). >>> >>> This is listed on > https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Documentation/AdminGuide/Installation/… >>> >>> Thanks >>> -Vincent >>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:30 AM Adel Atallah <adel.atallah(a)xwiki.com> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Vincent, >>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Adel >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:07 AM Marius Dumitru Florea >>>>> <mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Marius >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 11:04 AM Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> > wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi devs, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We now have >>>>>>> > https://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/ServletContainerSupportStrat… >>>>>>> but it’s not precise enough. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I’m proposing the following: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * Mention the supported version cycle and mention that we support > the >>>>>>> latest version of the cycle. >>>>>>> * For Tomcat, I propose to say we support Tomcat 8.x (which means > Tomcat >>>>>>> 8.5.34 as of today, see “latest” tag on > https://hub.docker.com/_/tomcat/) >>>> >>>> Actually from Tomcat point of view 8.0.x and 8.5.x are two different >>>> cycles so it would be more clear to say we support 8.5.x. >>>> >>>>>>> * For Jetty (standalone packaging or standard), I propose to say we >>>>>>> support Jetty 9.x (which means Jetty 9.4.12 as of today, see > “latest” tag >>>>>>> on https://hub.docker.com/_/jetty/) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> -Vincent >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thomas Mortagne >>> >> >> >> -- >> Thomas Mortagne > >

On 13 Nov 2018, at 11:25, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote: So I’m proposing: * Tomcat: latest of debian oldstable/stable/unstable for tomcat 8.x, see https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=default&section=all&arch=a… (in practice that’s 8.0.x and 8.5.x). @Thomas: I see that we provide a tomcat7 and tomcat8 packaging for debian. Should we drop the tomcat7 one? I don’t think we should support it. * Jetty: latest of debian oldstable/stable/unstable for jetty 9.x, see https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=default&section=all&arch=a… (in practice that’s 9.2.x). NOTE: Strange that “unstable” is lagging behind so much and that Jetty 9.4.x is not being tested. Anyway it’s easier to follow the debian repos. * Jetty Standaline: latest of Jetty 9.x, (i.e. 9.4.x FROM) I’m updating https://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/ServletContainerSupportStrat… , let me know if you disagree. Thanks -Vincent