[xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Sign our Maven artifacts using GPG

List overview All Threads
Download

newer

older

[xwiki-devs] Upgrade FF version to...

[xwiki-devs] Convert syntax from...

Vincent Massol

15 Aug 2011 15 Aug '11

5:19 p.m.

Hi, I think we should start signing our artifacts using PGP as explained here: https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/How+To+Generate+PGP+Signatures… Here's my +1 Thanks -Vincent PS: I we agree I can commit the changes required to our top level POM to implement this (I have them locally already)

Show replies by date

Sergiu Dumitriu

15 Aug 15 Aug

5:42 p.m.

On 08/15/2011 11:19 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:

...

Hi, I think we should start signing our artifacts using PGP as explained here: https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/How+To+Generate+PGP+Signatures… Here's my +1

+1. Do we use only one key, installed on the release machine? It should be protected by a strong passphrase.

...

Thanks -Vincent PS: I we agree I can commit the changes required to our top level POM to implement this (I have them locally already)

PS2: When's the release user ready on one of the new agents? -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/

Vincent Massol

5:50 p.m.

On Aug 15, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:

...

On 08/15/2011 11:19 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:

Hi, I think we should start signing our artifacts using PGP as explained here: https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/How+To+Generate+PGP+Signatures… Here's my +1

+1. Do we use only one key, installed on the release machine? It should be protected by a strong passphrase.

IMO every release manager should use his own key for better tracability.

...

Thanks -Vincent PS: I we agree I can commit the changes required to our top level POM to implement this (I have them locally already)

PS2: When's the release user ready on one of the new agents?

When someone creates it I guess. You could request that on the infra@ list. Thanks -Vincent

Alex Busenius

6:14 p.m.

On 15.08.2011 17:50, Vincent Massol wrote:

...

On Aug 15, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:

On 08/15/2011 11:19 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:

Hi, I think we should start signing our artifacts using PGP as explained here: https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/How+To+Generate+PGP+Signatures… Here's my +1

+1. Do we use only one key, installed on the release machine? It should be protected by a strong passphrase.

IMO every release manager should use his own key for better tracability.

+1 Alex

...

Thanks -Vincent PS: I we agree I can commit the changes required to our top level POM to implement this (I have them locally already)

PS2: When's the release user ready on one of the new agents?

When someone creates it I guess. You could request that on the infra@ list. Thanks -Vincent _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs(a)xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Thomas Mortagne

6:49 p.m.

+1 On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:

...

On Aug 15, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:

On 08/15/2011 11:19 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:

Hi, I think we should start signing our artifacts using PGP as explained here: https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/How+To+Generate+PGP+Signatures… Here's my +1

+1. Do we use only one key, installed on the release machine? It should be protected by a strong passphrase.

IMO every release manager should use his own key for better tracability.

Thanks -Vincent PS: I we agree I can commit the changes required to our top level POM to implement this (I have them locally already)

PS2: When's the release user ready on one of the new agents?

-- Thomas Mortagne

Caleb James DeLisle

6:04 p.m.

On 08/15/2011 11:42 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:

...

On 08/15/2011 11:19 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:

Hi, I think we should start signing our artifacts using PGP as explained here: https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/How+To+Generate+PGP+Signatures… Here's my +1

+1. Do we use only one key, installed on the release machine? It should be protected by a strong passphrase.

+1 I really don't like the "one key on the release box" idea. IMO each release manager should sign with their key which ofc never leaves their own computer. Caleb

...

Thanks -Vincent PS: I we agree I can commit the changes required to our top level POM to implement this (I have them locally already)

PS2: When's the release user ready on one of the new agents?

Fabio Mancinelli

16 Aug 16 Aug

4:21 p.m.

Hi, +1 for every release manager to have his own key. Though I think that there should be an "XWiki.org" key that is kept only by one person and that is used to sign the release managers keys. In this way artifacts will be marked as released by somebody that is also trusted by XWiki.org. -Fabio On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Caleb James DeLisle <calebdelisle(a)lavabit.com> wrote:

...

On 08/15/2011 11:42 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:

On 08/15/2011 11:19 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:

Hi, I think we should start signing our artifacts using PGP as explained here: https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/How+To+Generate+PGP+Signatures… Here's my +1

+1. Do we use only one key, installed on the release machine? It should be protected by a strong passphrase.

+1 I really don't like the "one key on the release box" idea. IMO each release manager should sign with their key which ofc never leaves their own computer. Caleb

Thanks -Vincent PS: I we agree I can commit the changes required to our top level POM to implement this (I have them locally already)

PS2: When's the release user ready on one of the new agents?

_______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs(a)xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Sergiu Dumitriu

4:31 p.m.

On 08/16/2011 10:21 AM, Fabio Mancinelli wrote:

...

Yes, that's what I was thinking as well last night. And the XWiki.org master key should be signed by a trusted authority.

...

-Fabio On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Caleb James DeLisle <calebdelisle(a)lavabit.com> wrote: > > > On 08/15/2011 11:42 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: >> On 08/15/2011 11:19 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I think we should start signing our artifacts using PGP as explained here: >>> https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/How+To+Generate+PGP+Signatures… >>> >>> Here's my +1 >> >> +1. >> >> Do we use only one key, installed on the release machine? It should be >> protected by a strong passphrase. > > +1 > I really don't like the "one key on the release box" idea. > IMO each release manager should sign with their key which ofc never leaves their own computer. > > Caleb > >> >>> >>> Thanks >>> -Vincent >>> >>> PS: I we agree I can commit the changes required to our top level POM to implement this (I have them locally already) >> >> PS2: When's the release user ready on one of the new agents? >>

-- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/

Marius Dumitru Florea

6:25 p.m.

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:

...

On 08/16/2011 10:21 AM, Fabio Mancinelli wrote:

Yes, that's what I was thinking as well last night. And the XWiki.org master key should be signed by a trusted authority.

+1 Thanks, Marius

...

-- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs(a)xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Denis Gervalle

18 Aug 18 Aug

11:20 a.m.

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 16:31, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:

...

On 08/16/2011 10:21 AM, Fabio Mancinelli wrote:

Yes, that's what I was thinking as well last night. And the XWiki.org master key should be signed by a trusted authority.

+1 Denis

...

here:

>>>

https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/How+To+Generate+PGP+Signatures…

>>>

>>>> Here's my +1 >>> >>> +1. >>> >>> Do we use only one key, installed on the release machine? It should be >>> protected by a strong passphrase. >> >> +1 >> I really don't like the "one key on the release box" idea. >> IMO each release manager should sign with their key which ofc never leaves their own computer. >> >> Caleb >> >>>

>>>

>>>> Thanks >>>> -Vincent

>>>

>>>> PS: I we agree I can commit the changes required to our top level POM to implement this (I have them locally already)

>> >> PS2: When's the release user ready on one of the new agents? >>

-- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs(a)xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

-- Denis Gervalle SOFTEC sa - CEO eGuilde sarl - CTO

Sergiu Dumitriu

22 Aug 22 Aug

6:30 p.m.

On 08/15/2011 12:04 PM, Caleb James DeLisle wrote:

...

On 08/15/2011 11:42 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:

On 08/15/2011 11:19 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:

Hi, I think we should start signing our artifacts using PGP as explained here: https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/How+To+Generate+PGP+Signatures… Here's my +1

+1. Do we use only one key, installed on the release machine? It should be protected by a strong passphrase.

+1 I really don't like the "one key on the release box" idea. IMO each release manager should sign with their key which ofc never leaves their own computer.

The problem with this is that the GPG signing is supposed to happen during mvn release:perform, which happens on the agent machine. There are two options: - temporarily install the personal private key on the server - release from the local computer Is there a way to tunnel the GPG signing to the local computer?

...

> >> >> Thanks >> -Vincent >> >> PS: I we agree I can commit the changes required to our top level POM to implement this (I have them locally already) > > PS2: When's the release user ready on one of the new agents? >

-- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/

Sergiu Dumitriu

23 Aug 23 Aug

2:18 a.m.

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:

...

On 08/15/2011 12:04 PM, Caleb James DeLisle wrote:

On 08/15/2011 11:42 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:

On 08/15/2011 11:19 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:

Hi, I think we should start signing our artifacts using PGP as explained here: https://docs.sonatype.org/**display/Repository/How+To+** Generate+PGP+Signatures+With+**Maven<https://docs.sonatype.org/display/R… Here's my +1

+1. Do we use only one key, installed on the release machine? It should be protected by a strong passphrase.

+1 I really don't like the "one key on the release box" idea. IMO each release manager should sign with their key which ofc never leaves their own computer.

Found this: http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2010-July/039112.html

...

> >> Thanks >> -Vincent >> >> PS: I we agree I can commit the changes required to our top level POM to >> implement this (I have them locally already) >> > > PS2: When's the release user ready on one of the new agents? > >

-- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/

Vincent Massol

15 Aug 15 Aug

6:53 p.m.

Note that I forgot to mention it but signing artifacts is a preprequisites for being able to push xwiki artifacts to Maven Central too. Thanks -Vincent On Aug 15, 2011, at 5:19 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:

...

Jerome Velociter

9:32 p.m.

On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:

...

Hi, I think we should start signing our artifacts using PGP as explained here: https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/How+To+Generate+PGP+Signatures… Here's my +1

+1 Jerome

...

Thanks -Vincent PS: I we agree I can commit the changes required to our top level POM to implement this (I have them locally already) _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs(a)xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

4826

days inactive

4834

days old

xwiki-devs@xwiki.org

Manage subscription

13 comments

9 participants

tags (0)

participants (9)

Alex Busenius
Caleb James DeLisle
Denis Gervalle
Fabio Mancinelli
Jerome Velociter
Marius Dumitru Florea
Sergiu Dumitriu
Thomas Mortagne
Vincent Massol