30 Nov
2010
30 Nov
'10
11:45 a.m.
Hi devs,
I'd like to add a new administration section for the WYSIWYG editor. For
this I'll create a new page:
XWiki.WysiwygEditorConfig (storing the WYSIWYG editor configuration
class/object and the XWiki.ConfigurableClass objects)
Is this fine with you? I don't think a separate application is needed yet.
The WYSIWYG editor configuration will contain there sections/properties:
General settings
----------------
Display the WYSIWYG/Source tabs [Yes/No]
The editor tab selected initially [WYSIWYG/Source]
The list of enabled plugins [submit line separator ...]
The top menu items [link image table macro import]
The list of tool bar items [bold italic underline ...]
Link settings
-------------
Limit attachment selection to the edited page [Yes/No]
Image settings
--------------
Allow insertion of external images [Yes/No]
Limit image selection to the edited page [Yes/No]
Color settings
--------------
The colors available in the color picker
[#000000,#444444,#666666,#999999,#CCCCCC ...]
The number of colors to display per row in the color picker [8]
Font settings
-------------
The list of available font names [andale mono, arial, arial black, ...]
The list of available font sizes [8pt, 10pt, 12pt, ...]
Style settings
--------------
The list of predefined styles []
WDYT?
Thanks,
Marius
30 Nov
30 Nov
11:56 a.m.
Big +1
This will be a lot more intuitive then the current customization approach.
Thanks,
Florin Ciubotaru
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to add a new administration section for the WYSIWYG editor. For
this I'll create a new page:
XWiki.WysiwygEditorConfig (storing the WYSIWYG editor configuration
class/object and the XWiki.ConfigurableClass objects)
Is this fine with you? I don't think a separate application is needed yet.
The WYSIWYG editor configuration will contain there sections/properties:
General settings
----------------
Display the WYSIWYG/Source tabs [Yes/No]
The editor tab selected initially [WYSIWYG/Source]
The list of enabled plugins [submit line separator ...]
The top menu items [link image table macro import]
The list of tool bar items [bold italic underline ...]
Link settings
-------------
Limit attachment selection to the edited page [Yes/No]
Image settings
--------------
Allow insertion of external images [Yes/No]
Limit image selection to the edited page [Yes/No]
Color settings
--------------
The colors available in the color picker
[#000000,#444444,#666666,#999999,#CCCCCC ...]
The number of colors to display per row in the color picker [8]
Font settings
-------------
The list of available font names [andale mono, arial, arial black, ...]
The list of available font sizes [8pt, 10pt, 12pt, ...]
Style settings
--------------
The list of predefined styles []
WDYT?
Thanks,
Marius
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
12:11 p.m.
Hi,
+1 as well, I've had the request from users to modify WYSIWYG parameters
multiple times in the past and it's always been a big PITA, this will be a
great improvement.
Guillaume
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:56, Florin Ciubotaru <florinciu(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Big +1
This will be a lot more intuitive then the current customization approach.
Thanks,
Florin Ciubotaru
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to add a new administration section for the WYSIWYG editor. For
this I'll create a new page:
XWiki.WysiwygEditorConfig (storing the WYSIWYG editor configuration
class/object and the XWiki.ConfigurableClass objects)
Is this fine with you? I don't think a separate application is needed
yet.
The WYSIWYG editor configuration will contain there sections/properties:
General settings
----------------
Display the WYSIWYG/Source tabs [Yes/No]
The editor tab selected initially [WYSIWYG/Source]
The list of enabled plugins [submit line separator ...]
The top menu items [link image table macro import]
The list of tool bar items [bold italic underline ...]
Link settings
-------------
Limit attachment selection to the edited page [Yes/No]
Image settings
--------------
Allow insertion of external images [Yes/No]
Limit image selection to the edited page [Yes/No]
Color settings
--------------
The colors available in the color picker
[#000000,#444444,#666666,#999999,#CCCCCC ...]
The number of colors to display per row in the color picker [8]
Font settings
-------------
The list of available font names [andale mono, arial, arial black, ...]
The list of available font sizes [8pt, 10pt, 12pt, ...]
Style settings
--------------
The list of predefined styles []
WDYT?
Thanks,
Marius
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
12:11 p.m.
+1
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:56, Florin Ciubotaru <florinciu(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Big +1
This will be a lot more intuitive then the current customization approach.
Thanks,
Florin Ciubotaru
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to add a new administration section for the WYSIWYG editor. For
this I'll create a new page:
XWiki.WysiwygEditorConfig (storing the WYSIWYG editor configuration
class/object and the XWiki.ConfigurableClass objects)
Is this fine with you? I don't think a separate application is needed
yet.
The WYSIWYG editor configuration will contain there sections/properties:
General settings
----------------
Display the WYSIWYG/Source tabs [Yes/No]
The editor tab selected initially [WYSIWYG/Source]
The list of enabled plugins [submit line separator ...]
The top menu items [link image table macro import]
The list of tool bar items [bold italic underline ...]
Link settings
-------------
Limit attachment selection to the edited page [Yes/No]
Image settings
--------------
Allow insertion of external images [Yes/No]
Limit image selection to the edited page [Yes/No]
Color settings
--------------
The colors available in the color picker
[#000000,#444444,#666666,#999999,#CCCCCC ...]
The number of colors to display per row in the color picker [8]
Font settings
-------------
The list of available font names [andale mono, arial, arial black, ...]
The list of available font sizes [8pt, 10pt, 12pt, ...]
Style settings
--------------
The list of predefined styles []
WDYT?
Thanks,
Marius
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
11:56 a.m.
+0
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:45, Marius Dumitru Florea
<mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to add a new administration section for the WYSIWYG editor. For
this I'll create a new page:
XWiki.WysiwygEditorConfig (storing the WYSIWYG editor configuration
class/object and the XWiki.ConfigurableClass objects)
Is this fine with you? I don't think a separate application is needed yet.
The WYSIWYG editor configuration will contain there sections/properties:
General settings
----------------
Display the WYSIWYG/Source tabs [Yes/No]
The editor tab selected initially [WYSIWYG/Source]
The list of enabled plugins [submit line separator ...]
The top menu items [link image table macro import]
The list of tool bar items [bold italic underline ...]
Link settings
-------------
Limit attachment selection to the edited page [Yes/No]
Image settings
--------------
Allow insertion of external images [Yes/No]
Limit image selection to the edited page [Yes/No]
Color settings
--------------
The colors available in the color picker
[#000000,#444444,#666666,#999999,#CCCCCC ...]
The number of colors to display per row in the color picker [8]
Font settings
-------------
The list of available font names [andale mono, arial, arial black, ...]
The list of available font sizes [8pt, 10pt, 12pt, ...]
Style settings
--------------
The list of predefined styles []
WDYT?
Thanks,
Marius
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
12:15 p.m.
+1
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
<mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to add a new administration section for the WYSIWYG editor. For
this I'll create a new page:
XWiki.WysiwygEditorConfig (storing the WYSIWYG editor configuration
class/object and the XWiki.ConfigurableClass objects)
Is this fine with you? I don't think a separate application is needed yet.
The WYSIWYG editor configuration will contain there sections/properties:
General settings
----------------
Display the WYSIWYG/Source tabs [Yes/No]
The editor tab selected initially [WYSIWYG/Source]
The list of enabled plugins [submit line separator ...]
The top menu items [link image table macro import]
The list of tool bar items [bold italic underline ...]
Link settings
-------------
Limit attachment selection to the edited page [Yes/No]
Image settings
--------------
Allow insertion of external images [Yes/No]
Limit image selection to the edited page [Yes/No]
Color settings
--------------
The colors available in the color picker
[#000000,#444444,#666666,#999999,#CCCCCC ...]
The number of colors to display per row in the color picker [8]
Font settings
-------------
The list of available font names [andale mono, arial, arial black, ...]
The list of available font sizes [8pt, 10pt, 12pt, ...]
Style settings
--------------
The list of predefined styles []
WDYT?
Thanks,
Marius
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
12:19 p.m.
+1, with one remark, see below.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
<mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to add a new administration section for the WYSIWYG editor. For
this I'll create a new page:
XWiki.WysiwygEditorConfig (storing the WYSIWYG editor configuration
class/object and the XWiki.ConfigurableClass objects)
Is this fine with you? I don't think a separate application is needed yet.
The WYSIWYG editor configuration will contain there sections/properties:
General settings
----------------
Display the WYSIWYG/Source tabs [Yes/No]
The editor tab selected initially [WYSIWYG/Source]
I'd rather plug this to the user's editor preference.
Imho we should try not to have "WYSIWYG" and "Wiki" in our list of
editors but only "Content", with the source tab loaded by default for
users which prefers to edit wiki syntax directly, WDYT ?
The list of enabled plugins [submit line separator
...]
The top menu items [link image table macro import]
The list of tool bar items [bold italic underline ...]
Link settings
-------------
Limit attachment selection to the edited page [Yes/No]
Image settings
--------------
Allow insertion of external images [Yes/No]
Limit image selection to the edited page [Yes/No]
Color settings
--------------
The colors available in the color picker
[#000000,#444444,#666666,#999999,#CCCCCC ...]
The number of colors to display per row in the color picker [8]
Font settings
-------------
The list of available font names [andale mono, arial, arial black, ...]
The list of available font sizes [8pt, 10pt, 12pt, ...]
Style settings
--------------
The list of predefined styles []
WDYT?
Thanks,
Marius
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
3:37 p.m.
+1
Also agreeing with JV regarding the WYSIWYG source vs Wiki editor confusion,
but this is probably another matter since users like me which does not use
the WYSIWYG editor do not want to suffer the load of the WYSIWYG editor just
to edit the source.
Denis
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:19, Jean-Vincent Drean <jean-vincent(a)drean.org>wrote;wrote:
+1, with one remark, see below.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
<mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
Hi devs,
I'd like to add a new administration section for the WYSIWYG editor. For
this I'll create a new page:
XWiki.WysiwygEditorConfig (storing the WYSIWYG editor configuration
class/object and the XWiki.ConfigurableClass objects)
Is this fine with you? I don't think a separate application is needed
yet.
The WYSIWYG editor configuration will contain there sections/properties:
General settings
----------------
Display the WYSIWYG/Source tabs [Yes/No]
The editor tab selected initially [WYSIWYG/Source]
I'd rather plug this to the user's editor preference.
Imho we should try not to have "WYSIWYG" and "Wiki" in our list of
editors but only "Content", with the source tab loaded by default for
users which prefers to edit wiki syntax directly, WDYT ?
The list of enabled plugins [submit line
separator ...]
The top menu items [link image table macro import]
The list of tool bar items [bold italic underline ...]
Link settings
-------------
Limit attachment selection to the edited page [Yes/No]
Image settings
--------------
Allow insertion of external images [Yes/No]
Limit image selection to the edited page [Yes/No]
Color settings
--------------
The colors available in the color picker
[#000000,#444444,#666666,#999999,#CCCCCC ...]
The number of colors to display per row in the color picker [8]
Font settings
-------------
The list of available font names [andale mono, arial, arial black, ...]
The list of available font sizes [8pt, 10pt, 12pt, ...]
Style settings
--------------
The list of predefined styles []
WDYT?
Thanks,
Marius
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
3:46 p.m.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Denis Gervalle <dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
+1
Also agreeing with JV regarding the WYSIWYG source vs Wiki editor confusion,
but this is probably another matter since users like me which does not use
the WYSIWYG editor do not want to suffer the load of the WYSIWYG editor just
to edit the source.
I understand your concern but the WYSIWYG tabs have been implemented
so that most of the loading (js execution that is) happens when
switching to the WYSIWYG tab. At least the first implementation was
working like this.
JV.
4:08 p.m.
On 11/30/2010 04:46 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Denis
Gervalle<dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
The implementation has changed a bit since. Anyway, the JavaScript code
(~500KB) still needs to be evaluated even if the part that is executed
afterwards, when Source is the default tab, is insignificant.
Thanks,
Marius
+1
Also agreeing with JV regarding the WYSIWYG source vs Wiki editor confusion,
but this is probably another matter since users like me which does not use
the WYSIWYG editor do not want to suffer the load of the WYSIWYG editor just
to edit the source.
I understand your concern but the WYSIWYG tabs have been implemented
so that most of the loading (js execution that is) happens when
switching to the WYSIWYG tab. At least the first implementation was
working like this. JV.
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
4:14 p.m.
On Nov 30, 2010, at 4:08 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
On 11/30/2010 04:46 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:
Still we should allow integrators to create a wiki without any wysiwyg editor and only a
wiki editor should they want this. If they want to embed a wiki for example in their own
application it has to be as lightweight as possible and not having to include any GWT jars
will make it lighter.
On my side, I still don't like very much at all this source tab since it's
confusing and it means we have 2 wiki editors. We need to decide something on this - in
another thread.... Who wants to start it?
Thanks
-Vincent
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Denis
Gervalle<dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
The implementation has changed a bit since. Anyway, the JavaScript code
(~500KB) still needs to be evaluated even if the part that is executed
afterwards, when Source is the default tab, is insignificant. +1
Also agreeing with JV regarding the WYSIWYG source vs Wiki editor confusion,
but this is probably another matter since users like me which does not use
the WYSIWYG editor do not want to suffer the load of the WYSIWYG editor just
to edit the source.
I understand your concern but the WYSIWYG tabs have been implemented
so that most of the loading (js execution that is) happens when
switching to the WYSIWYG tab. At least the first implementation was
working like this.
4:15 p.m.
Ok then I'm -1 with my previous remark.
JV.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea
<mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On 11/30/2010 04:46 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Denis
Gervalle<dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
The implementation has changed a bit since. Anyway, the JavaScript code
(~500KB) still needs to be evaluated even if the part that is executed
afterwards, when Source is the default tab, is insignificant.
Thanks,
Marius
+1
Also agreeing with JV regarding the WYSIWYG source vs Wiki editor confusion,
but this is probably another matter since users like me which does not use
the WYSIWYG editor do not want to suffer the load of the WYSIWYG editor just
to edit the source.
I understand your concern but the WYSIWYG tabs have been implemented
so that most of the loading (js execution that is) happens when
switching to the WYSIWYG tab. At least the first implementation was
working like this. JV.
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
4:01 p.m.
On 11/30/2010 04:37 PM, Denis Gervalle wrote:
+1
Also agreeing with JV regarding the WYSIWYG source vs Wiki editor confusion,
but this is probably another matter since users like me which does not use
the WYSIWYG editor do not want to suffer the load of the WYSIWYG editor just
to edit the source.
Indeed, this needs another discussion. There is also some work to do in
order to integrate the current wiki editor with the WYSIWYG source tab.
Thanks,
Marius
Denis
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:19, Jean-Vincent Drean<jean-vincent(a)drean.org>wrote;wrote:
+1, with one remark, see below.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
<mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to add a new administration section for the WYSIWYG editor. For
this I'll create a new page:
XWiki.WysiwygEditorConfig (storing the WYSIWYG editor configuration
class/object and the XWiki.ConfigurableClass objects)
Is this fine with you? I don't think a separate application is needed
yet.
The WYSIWYG editor configuration will contain there sections/properties:
General settings
----------------
Display the WYSIWYG/Source tabs [Yes/No]
The editor tab selected initially [WYSIWYG/Source]
I'd rather plug this to the user's editor preference.
Imho we should try not to have "WYSIWYG" and "Wiki" in our list of
editors but only "Content", with the source tab loaded by default for
users which prefers to edit wiki syntax directly, WDYT ?
The list of enabled plugins [submit line
separator ...]
The top menu items [link image table macro import]
The list of tool bar items [bold italic underline ...]
Link settings
-------------
Limit attachment selection to the edited page [Yes/No]
Image settings
--------------
Allow insertion of external images [Yes/No]
Limit image selection to the edited page [Yes/No]
Color settings
--------------
The colors available in the color picker
[#000000,#444444,#666666,#999999,#CCCCCC ...]
The number of colors to display per row in the color picker [8]
Font settings
-------------
The list of available font names [andale mono, arial, arial black, ...]
The list of available font sizes [8pt, 10pt, 12pt, ...]
Style settings
--------------
The list of predefined styles []
WDYT?
Thanks,
Marius
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
4:32 p.m.
On 11/30/2010 11:45 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to add a new administration section for the WYSIWYG editor. For
this I'll create a new page:
XWiki.WysiwygEditorConfig (storing the WYSIWYG editor configuration
class/object and the XWiki.ConfigurableClass objects)
Is this fine with you? I don't think a separate application is needed yet.
+1.
The WYSIWYG editor configuration will contain there
sections/properties:
General settings
----------------
Display the WYSIWYG/Source tabs [Yes/No]
The editor tab selected initially [WYSIWYG/Source]
The list of enabled plugins [submit line separator ...]
The top menu items [link image table macro import]
The list of tool bar items [bold italic underline ...]
+0:
- I'd like the Source tab to be disabled by default
- I'm not sure the initially selected tab works well as a separate
option, since it can be set to a disabled tab. Actually I don't think it
makes sense to use the WYSIWYG editor in Source mode by default, that's
what the Wiki editor is for.
- How do we make the other options intuitive? Providing a plain text
input where the admin must enter valid names is not intuitive and prone
to errors. This option would at least require very good documentation
(and visibly linked from that field). An alternative is to provide a
mechanism for listing these options (Wysiwyg.getAvailableToolbarItems)
which then populates a list of checkboxes.
Link settings
-------------
Limit attachment selection to the edited page [Yes/No]
+1.
Default target?
Image settings
--------------
Allow insertion of external images [Yes/No]
Limit image selection to the edited page [Yes/No]
+1.
Automatically link to the image?
Color settings
--------------
The colors available in the color picker
[#000000,#444444,#666666,#999999,#CCCCCC ...]
The number of colors to display per row in the color picker [8]
-0. I'm not sure this is really relevant enough. IMO it just adds extra
complexity without too much value.
Font settings
-------------
The list of available font names [andale mono, arial, arial black, ...]
The list of available font sizes [8pt, 10pt, 12pt, ...]
Same concern as above, but +0, since this is a bit more important.
Style settings
--------------
The list of predefined styles []
+1. Again, this will need some help to let people know what must be used
here, and how to create new styles.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
5:19 p.m.
On 11/30/2010 05:32 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On 11/30/2010 11:45 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to add a new administration section for the WYSIWYG editor. For
this I'll create a new page:
XWiki.WysiwygEditorConfig (storing the WYSIWYG editor configuration
class/object and the XWiki.ConfigurableClass objects)
Is this fine with you? I don't think a separate application is needed yet.
+1.
The WYSIWYG editor configuration will contain
there sections/properties:
General settings
----------------
Display the WYSIWYG/Source tabs [Yes/No]
The editor tab selected initially [WYSIWYG/Source]
The list of enabled plugins [submit line separator ...]
The top menu items [link image table macro import]
The list of tool bar items [bold italic underline ...]
+0:
- I'd like the Source tab to be disabled by default
- I'm not sure the initially selected tab works well as a separate
option, since it can be set to a disabled tab. Actually I don't think it
makes sense to use the WYSIWYG editor in Source mode by default, that's
what the Wiki editor is for.
- How do we make the other options intuitive? Providing a plain text
input where the admin must enter valid names is not intuitive and prone
to errors. This option would at least require very good
documentation
(and visibly linked from that field).
The administration section is generated automatically from the
ConfigurableClass. Adding links to the documentation near each field or
detailed help labels is not straightforward.
An alternative is to provide a
mechanism for listing these options (Wysiwyg.getAvailableToolbarItems)
which then populates a list of checkboxes.
It's not that simple. The order in which the items appear in the list is
important.
Link settings
-------------
Limit attachment selection to the edited page [Yes/No]
+1.
Default target?
Target as in target="_blank"? This parameter is not currently available.
I listed only current parameters. We can add others later.
Image settings
--------------
Allow insertion of external images [Yes/No]
Limit image selection to the edited page [Yes/No]
+1.
Automatically link to the image?
Unavailable.
Color settings
--------------
The colors available in the color picker
[#000000,#444444,#666666,#999999,#CCCCCC ...]
The number of colors to display per row in the color picker [8]
-0. I'm not sure this is really relevant enough.
IMO it just adds extra
complexity without too much value.
This parameters are currently available. I think we should expose all
global (i.e. not instance) parameters in the administration section.
Relevance is subjective. I imagine there are users who want to customise
the colors of the color picker.
Thanks,
Marius
Font settings
-------------
The list of available font names [andale mono, arial, arial black, ...]
The list of available font sizes [8pt, 10pt, 12pt, ...]
Same concern as above, but +0, since this is a bit more important.
Style settings
--------------
The list of predefined styles []
+1. Again, this will need some help to let people know what must be used
here, and how to create new styles.
5135
days inactive
5135
days old
14 comments
10 participants
participants (10)
-
Denis Gervalle -
Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) -
Florin Ciubotaru -
Guillaume Lerouge -
Jean-Vincent Drean -
Marius Dumitru Florea -
Marta Girdea -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Thomas Mortagne -
Vincent Massol