[xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Register global wiki macro at wiki level when the macro document is in a subwiki
21 Oct
2015
21 Oct
'15
10:08 a.m.
Hi devs,
It looks like a bug to me, but wiki macro defined for global level in a
subwiki, are effectively influencing the whole farm. I would like to change
that like this:
* global level macro are registered global only if defined in the main wiki
* global and wiki level macro defined in a subwiki are registered at wiki
level
The rationals are:
* if the same global macro document is deployed on more than one wiki,
which just means the same extension defining that document is installed on
multiple wiki, maybe in different version, all those macros will be in
conflict, it will not be easy to know which one wins, and even more
difficult to detect the problem in the first place.
* there is risk (of course limited by the PR), that user of subwiki
influence the behaviors of the whole farm, which IMO is quite opposite to
the logical structure, and even the physical storage we are used to.
* I do not see any benefit of putting a global macro in a subwiki
wdyt ?
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
21 Oct
21 Oct
10:48 a.m.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Denis Gervalle <dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
Hi devs,
It looks like a bug to me, but wiki macro defined for global level in a
subwiki, are effectively influencing the whole farm.
If the wiki macro is saved by a global user that has PR.
I would like to change
that like this:
* global level macro are registered global only if defined in the main
wiki
* global and wiki level macro defined in a subwiki are registered at wiki
level
The rationals are:
* if the same global macro document is deployed on more than one wiki,
which just means the same extension defining that document is installed on
multiple wiki, maybe in different version, all those macros will be in
conflict, it will not be easy to know which one wins, and even more
difficult to detect the problem in the first place.
This can happen also if two different extensions define a macro with the
same name (in two different documents), but I guess this is less probable.
* there is risk (of course limited by the PR), that
user of subwiki
influence the behaviors of the whole farm, which IMO is quite opposite to
the logical structure, and even the physical storage we are used to.
What do you mean by "user of subwiki"? It can be a global user.
I agree that subwikis should act as namespaces, and normally you expect
something defined in an inner namespace to not be visible in the outer
namespace. So +1
Thanks,
Marius
* I do not see any benefit of putting a global macro
in a subwiki
wdyt ?
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
11:31 a.m.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
It should be a global user, else no PR, but it could be “sementically” a
power user in a that usually only work in a given subwiki.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Denis Gervalle
<dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
Well, for sure, this could happen. What annoy me more, is the fact that
when I publish an extension with a macro set to Global, I have no way to
prevent it to be installed in subwikis, and shot myself in the foot.
And mostly the diagnosis is a big issue, since you have no easy way to find
why your nice macro on the main wiki is not working as expected in your own
wiki, or a subwiki you manage, because another subwiki is killing you.
Hi devs,
It looks like a bug to me, but wiki macro defined for global level in a
subwiki, are effectively influencing the whole farm.
If the wiki macro is saved by a global user that has PR.
I would like to change
that like this:
* global level macro are registered global only if defined in the main
wiki
* global and wiki level macro defined in a subwiki are registered at
wiki
level
The rationals are:
* if the same global macro document is deployed on more than one wiki,
which just means the same extension defining that document is installed
on
multiple wiki, maybe in different version, all
those macros will be in
conflict, it will not be easy to know which one wins, and even more
difficult to detect the problem in the first place.
This can happen also if two different extensions define a macro with the
same name (in two different documents), but I guess this is less probable.
* there is risk (of course limited by the PR),
that user of subwiki
influence the behaviors of the whole farm, which IMO is quite opposite to
the logical structure, and even the physical storage we are used to.
What do you mean by "user of subwiki"? It can be a global user.
I agree that subwikis should act as namespaces, and
normally you expect
something defined in an inner namespace to not be visible in the outer
namespace. So +1
You perfectly get my point, thanks for your vote :)
Thanks,
Marius
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
* I do not see any benefit of putting a global
macro in a subwiki
wdyt ?
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
26 Oct
26 Oct
10:53 a.m.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
<mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Denis Gervalle
<dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
Hi devs,
It looks like a bug to me, but wiki macro defined for global level in a
subwiki, are effectively influencing the whole farm.
If the wiki macro is saved by a global user that has PR.
I would like to change
that like this:
* global level macro are registered global only if defined in the main
wiki
* global and wiki level macro defined in a subwiki are registered at wiki
level
The rationals are:
* if the same global macro document is deployed on more than one wiki,
which just means the same extension defining that document is installed on
multiple wiki, maybe in different version, all those macros will be in
conflict, it will not be easy to know which one wins, and even more
difficult to detect the problem in the first place.
This can happen also if two different extensions define a macro with the
same name (in two different documents), but I guess this is less probable.
* there is risk (of course limited by the PR),
that user of subwiki
influence the behaviors of the whole farm, which IMO is quite opposite to
the logical structure, and even the physical storage we are used to.
What do you mean by "user of subwiki"? It can be a global user.
I agree that subwikis should act as namespaces, and
normally you expect
something defined in an inner namespace to not be visible in the outer
namespace. So +1
+1
To be consistent we should apply the same logic to other related use
cases like translations.
Thanks,
Marius
--
Thomas Mortagne
* I do not see any benefit of putting a global
macro in a subwiki
wdyt ?
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs 
27 Oct
27 Oct
11:37 a.m.
+1
2015-10-26 10:53 GMT+01:00 Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>om>:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Marius Dumitru
Florea
<mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
probable.
--
Guillaume Delhumeau (gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the XWiki.org project
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Denis Gervalle
<dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
wiki
Hi devs,
It looks like a bug to me, but wiki macro defined for global level in a
subwiki, are effectively influencing the whole farm.
If the wiki macro is saved by a global user that has PR.
> I would like to change
> that like this:
>
> * global level macro are registered global only if defined in the main
> wiki
> * global and wiki level macro defined in a subwiki are registered at > level
>
> The rationals are:
>
> * if the same global macro document is deployed on more than one wiki,
> which just means the same extension defining that document is installed
on
multiple
wiki, maybe in different version, all those macros will be in
conflict, it will not be easy to know which one wins, and even more
difficult to detect the problem in the first place.
This can happen also if two different extensions define a macro with the
same name (in two different documents), but I guess this is less
> * there is risk (of course limited by the PR), that user of subwiki
> influence the behaviors of the whole farm, which IMO is quite opposite
to
the
logical structure, and even the physical storage we are used to.
What do you mean by "user of subwiki"? It can be a global user.
I agree that subwikis should act as namespaces,
and normally you expect
something defined in an inner namespace to not be visible in the outer
namespace. So +1
+1
To be consistent we should apply the same logic to other related use
cases like translations.
Thanks,
Marius
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
* I do not see any benefit of putting a global
macro in a subwiki
wdyt ?
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
1:57 p.m.
Hi,
I have created https://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-12736 for this
improvement.
Regards,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau <
gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
+1
2015-10-26 10:53 GMT+01:00 Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>om>:
wiki,
--
Guillaume Delhumeau (gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the XWiki.org project
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Marius Dumitru
Florea
<mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Denis Gervalle <dgl(a)softec.lu>
wrote:
>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> It looks like a bug to me, but wiki macro defined for global level in
a
>> subwiki, are effectively influencing the
whole farm.
>
>
> If the wiki macro is saved by a global user that has PR.
>
>
>> I would like to change
>> that like this:
>>
>> * global level macro are registered global only if defined in the
main
> wiki
> * global and wiki level macro defined in a subwiki are registered at
wiki
>> level
>>
>> The rationals are:
>>
>> * if the same global macro document is deployed on more than one >> which just means the same extension
defining that document is
installed
on
>> multiple wiki, maybe in different version, all those macros will be in
>> conflict, it will not be easy to know which one wins, and even more
>> difficult to detect the problem in the first place.
>>
>
> This can happen also if two different extensions define a macro with
the
same name
(in two different documents), but I guess this is less
probable.
> * there is risk (of course limited by the PR), that user of subwiki
> influence the behaviors of the whole farm, which IMO is quite opposite
to
the
logical structure, and even the physical storage we are used to.
What do you mean by "user of subwiki"? It can be a global user.
I agree that subwikis should act as namespaces,
and normally you expect
something defined in an inner namespace to not be visible in the outer
namespace. So +1
+1
To be consistent we should apply the same logic to other related use
cases like translations.
Thanks,
Marius
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
* I do not see any benefit of putting a global
macro in a subwiki
wdyt ?
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs 
21 Oct
21 Oct
12:06 p.m.
Hi Denis,
On 21 Oct 2015 at 10:08:40, Denis Gervalle (dgl@softec.lu(mailto:dgl@softec.lu)) wrote:
Hi devs,
It looks like a bug to me, but wiki macro defined for global level in a
subwiki, are effectively influencing the whole farm. I would like to change
that like this:
* global level macro are registered global only if defined in the main wiki
* global and wiki level macro defined in a subwiki are registered at wiki
level
The rationals are:
* if the same global macro document is deployed on more than one wiki,
which just means the same extension defining that document is installed on
multiple wiki, maybe in different version, all those macros will be in
conflict, it will not be easy to know which one wins, and even more
difficult to detect the problem in the first place.
* there is risk (of course limited by the PR), that user of subwiki
influence the behaviors of the whole farm, which IMO is quite opposite to
the logical structure, and even the physical storage we are used to.
* I do not see any benefit of putting a global macro in a subwiki
wdyt ?
I think it’s a more global issue. For example any global user with PR can always impact
the whole farm even when he’s on a subwiki, since that user can register components in the
Root Component Manager for example.
The way we protected against this is by requiring PR on the main wiki.
Now I’m ok to do what you suggest, but just know it’s not the only way to impact the whole
farm from a subwiki. Makes it a bit less easy though ;)
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Denis Gervalle
3344
days inactive
3350
days old
6 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Denis Gervalle -
Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau -
Marius Dumitru Florea -
Thomas Mortagne -
vincent＠massol.net