23 Apr
2012
23 Apr
'12
12:26 a.m.
Hello,
Seems I did not understand everything about how to write unit tests ...
Here's my problem : I want to test a class MA, a component, that has the
following code (excerpt) :
My test class MATest contains :
Here I'm looking up the Execution in order to set expectations on it for the
initialize to pass.
Problem is that I'm still getting this at test execution :
It seems that my initialize() method is called at lookup(), so how could I
set-up the expectations before they're actually exercised ? :
Thanks for help,
Jeremie
--
View this message in context:
http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/Some-difficulties-with-unit-testing-tp749…
Sent from the XWiki- Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
3 May
3 May
2:45 p.m.
Hello community,
No idea on this problem ? I'm pretty sure it's stupid but I'm stuck ...
Teasing Motivation argument : it will soon slow down my progress on the mail
archive applicaiton ... ;)
Thanks,
Jeremie
--
View this message in context:
http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/Some-difficulties-with-unit-testing-tp749…
Sent from the XWiki- Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
3:05 p.m.
On May 3, 2012, at 2:45 PM, jerem wrote:
Hello community,
No idea on this problem ?
What problem? I can't see any in your mail…
Thanks
-Vincent
PS: I already asked you in the past to not remove initial mail context when you reply as
otherwise it's impossible to follow you.
I'm pretty sure it's stupid but I'm stuck
...
Teasing Motivation argument : it will soon slow down my progress on the mail
archive applicaiton ... ;)
Thanks,
Jeremie
4 May
4 May
11:58 a.m.
Hi Jerem,
Are you using nabble.com directly to send/reply to mails? If that is the
case, then maybe you can configure it to include the mail thread.
Also, in this particular mail that you have sent, the code is not visible.
I see on nabble that you`ve used a different font or some special
formatting that did not make it trough to the mailing list.
If possible, please use a standard mail client, gmail or at least configure
nabble(or whatever you`re using) to behave like one :)
It will improve your response rate for future mails ;)
Thanks,
Eduard
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On May 3, 2012, at 2:45 PM, jerem wrote:
Hello community,
No idea on this problem ?
What problem? I can't see any in your mail…
Thanks
-Vincent
PS: I already asked you in the past to not remove initial mail context
when you reply as otherwise it's impossible to follow you.
I'm pretty sure it's stupid but I'm
stuck ...
Teasing Motivation argument : it will soon slow down my progress on the
mail
archive applicaiton ... ;)
Thanks,
Jeremie
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
9 May
9 May
12:10 p.m.
Hi,
Sorry about that ... You're right my "nabble-ized" mails seem to be
viewable correctly only from nabble ... :/
I put back here my initial request :
Seems I did not understand everything about how to write unit tests ...
Here's my problem : I want to test a class MA, a component, that has the
following code (excerpt) :
@Inject
private Execution execution;
@Override
public void initialize() throws InitializationException
{
try {
ExecutionContext context = execution.getContext();
...
}
My test class MATest contains :
@MockingRequirement
private MA ma;
/**
* @see org.xwiki.test.AbstractMockingComponentTestCase#configure()
*/
@Override
public void configure() throws Exception
{
try {
final Execution execution =
getComponentManager().lookup(Execution.class);
Mockery context = new Mockery();
context.checking(new Expectations()
{
{
oneOf(execution).getContext();
}
});
Here I'm looking up the Execution in order to set expectations on it for
the initialize to pass.
Problem is that I'm still getting this at test execution :
java.lang.AssertionError: unexpected invocation: execution.getContext()
It seems that my initialize() method is called at lookup(), so how could I
set-up the expectations before they're actually exercised ? :
at org.xwiki.component.ma.internal.MA.initialize(MA.java:165) ~[classes/:na]
at
org.xwiki.component.embed.InitializableLifecycleHandler.handle(InitializableLifecycleHandler.java:39)
[xwiki-commons-component-default-3.5.jar:na]
at
org.xwiki.component.embed.EmbeddableComponentManager.createInstance(EmbeddableComponentManager.java:295)
[xwiki-commons-component-default-3.5.jar:na]
at
org.xwiki.component.embed.EmbeddableComponentManager.getComponentInstance(EmbeddableComponentManager.java:358)
[xwiki-commons-component-default-3.5.jar:na]
at
org.xwiki.component.embed.EmbeddableComponentManager.getComponentInstance(EmbeddableComponentManager.java:324)
[xwiki-commons-component-default-3.5.jar:na]
at
org.xwiki.component.embed.EmbeddableComponentManager.lookup(EmbeddableComponentManager.java:147)
[xwiki-commons-component-default-3.5.jar:na]
Thanks for help,
Jeremie
2012/5/4 Eduard Moraru <enygma2002(a)gmail.com>
Hi Jerem,
Are you using nabble.com directly to send/reply to mails? If that is the
case, then maybe you can configure it to include the mail thread.
Also, in this particular mail that you have sent, the code is not visible.
I see on nabble that you`ve used a different font or some special
formatting that did not make it trough to the mailing list.
If possible, please use a standard mail client, gmail or at least configure
nabble(or whatever you`re using) to behave like one :)
It will improve your response rate for future mails ;)
Thanks,
Eduard
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On May 3, 2012, at 2:45 PM, jerem wrote:
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
Hello community,
No idea on this problem ?
What problem? I can't see any in your mail…
Thanks
-Vincent
PS: I already asked you in the past to not remove initial mail context
when you reply as otherwise it's impossible to follow you.
I'm pretty sure it's stupid but I'm
stuck ...
Teasing Motivation argument : it will soon slow down my progress on the
mail
archive applicaiton ... ;)
Thanks,
Jeremie
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
10 May
10 May
11:20 a.m.
Hi Jeremie,
On May 9, 2012, at 12:10 PM, Jeremie BOUSQUET wrote:
Hi,
Sorry about that ... You're right my "nabble-ized" mails seem to be
viewable correctly only from nabble ... :/
I put back here my initial request :
Seems I did not understand everything about how to write unit tests ...
Here's my problem : I want to test a class MA, a component, that has the
following code (excerpt) :
@Inject
private Execution execution;
@Override
public void initialize() throws InitializationException
{
try {
ExecutionContext context = execution.getContext();
...
}
My test class MATest contains :
@MockingRequirement
private MA ma;
/**
* @see org.xwiki.test.AbstractMockingComponentTestCase#configure()
*/
@Override
public void configure() throws Exception
{
try {
You shouldn't have a try/catch since you're no testing this
final Execution execution =
getComponentManager().lookup(Execution.class);
Mockery context = new Mockery();
context.checking(new Expectations()
{
{
oneOf(execution).getContext();
}
});
Here I'm looking up the Execution in order to set expectations on it for
the initialize to pass.
BTW don't forget to add a will(returnValue(…))
Problem is that I'm still getting this at test
execution :
java.lang.AssertionError: unexpected invocation: execution.getContext()
It seems that my initialize() method is called at lookup(), so how could I
set-up the expectations before they're actually exercised ? :
By setting the expectations in configure(). Here's the javadoc for it:
/**
* Provides a hook so that users of this class can perform configuration before the
component is looked up. This
* allows for example the ability to set expectations on mocked components used in
Initializable.initialize()
* methods.
*/
public void configure() throws Exception
{
// Do nothing by default, this method is supposed to be overridden if needed.
}
I've now documented it at the class level.
Thanks
-Vincent
at
org.xwiki.component.ma.internal.MA.initialize(MA.java:165) ~[classes/:na]
at
org.xwiki.component.embed.InitializableLifecycleHandler.handle(InitializableLifecycleHandler.java:39)
[xwiki-commons-component-default-3.5.jar:na]
at
org.xwiki.component.embed.EmbeddableComponentManager.createInstance(EmbeddableComponentManager.java:295)
[xwiki-commons-component-default-3.5.jar:na]
at
org.xwiki.component.embed.EmbeddableComponentManager.getComponentInstance(EmbeddableComponentManager.java:358)
[xwiki-commons-component-default-3.5.jar:na]
at
org.xwiki.component.embed.EmbeddableComponentManager.getComponentInstance(EmbeddableComponentManager.java:324)
[xwiki-commons-component-default-3.5.jar:na]
at
org.xwiki.component.embed.EmbeddableComponentManager.lookup(EmbeddableComponentManager.java:147)
[xwiki-commons-component-default-3.5.jar:na]
Thanks for help,
Jeremie
2012/5/4 Eduard Moraru <enygma2002(a)gmail.com>
> Hi Jerem,
>
> Are you using nabble.com directly to send/reply to mails? If that is the
> case, then maybe you can configure it to include the mail thread.
>
> Also, in this particular mail that you have sent, the code is not visible.
> I see on nabble that you`ve used a different font or some special
> formatting that did not make it trough to the mailing list.
>
> If possible, please use a standard mail client, gmail or at least configure
> nabble(or whatever you`re using) to behave like one :)
>
> It will improve your response rate for future mails ;)
>
> Thanks,
> Eduard
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> On May 3, 2012, at 2:45 PM, jerem wrote:
>>
>>> Hello community,
>>>
>>> No idea on this problem ?
>>
>> What problem? I can't see any in your mail…
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent
>>
>> PS: I already asked you in the past to not remove initial mail context
>> when you reply as otherwise it's impossible to follow you.
>>
>>> I'm pretty sure it's stupid but I'm stuck ...
>>> Teasing Motivation argument : it will soon slow down my progress on the
>> mail
>>> archive applicaiton ... ;)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jeremie
4926
days inactive
4944
days old
5 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Eduard Moraru -
jerem -
Jeremie BOUSQUET
-
Vincent Massol