On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Ludovic Dubost <ludovic(a)xwiki.org> wrote:
Hi Asiri,
I agree.. modularization is important.. I think you should also have
different classes for each view..
Good Point. :)
Thanks.
- Asiri
It would be great to be able to extend the application with views
(written in groovy for example).
You could for example make a view of documents of a certain class..
I'm sending another email because I cannot run the prototype.
Ludovic
Asiri Rathnayake wrote:
Hi Ludovic,
I have added PUT / MKCOL support for xwiki-webdav but MKCOL support is
limited at this point. Users can add spaces, pages (into spaces), edit
/ write changes into pages. But i've hit a wall trying to implement
prent-child relationships (adding child pages).
At this point i have to emphasize that we need to refactor our code
base before moving any further, because XWikiDavResourceImpl is really
huge and it's complexity drives me nuts at some points (sooo many
if-else switches).
At a first glance i see following class structure,
DavResource
|
+ - XWikiDavResource (abstract)
|
+ - XWikiRootDavResource (for views)
|
+ - XWikiSpaceDavResource
|
+ - XWikiPageDavResource
|
+ - XWikiAttachmentDavResource
I've almost hit a dead-end with the current code base (because i was
trying to stick with it) and i seriously believe we have to refactor.
I can complete this refactoring within a week's time so that it won't
affect my time line.
Ludovic, what so you think ?
If any of you have comments about the design i propose, please let me
know.
Thanks.
- Asiri
--
Ludovic Dubost
Blog:
http://blog.ludovic.org/
XWiki:
http://www.xwiki.com
Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs