Re: [xwiki-devs] [xwiki-notifications] r10858 - in xwiki-platform/core/trunk/xwiki-cache/xwiki-cache-jbosscache/src: main/java/org/xwiki/cache/jbosscache/internal test/java/org/xwiki/cache/jbosscache
26 Jun
2008
26 Jun
'08
9:23 p.m.
On Jun 26, 2008, at 9:05 PM, tmortagne (SVN) wrote:
Author: tmortagne
Date: 2008-06-26 21:05:24 +0200 (Thu, 26 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 10858
Modified:
xwiki-platform/core/trunk/xwiki-cache/xwiki-cache-jbosscache/src/
main/java/org/xwiki/cache/jbosscache/internal/
JBossCacheCacheConfiguration.java
xwiki-platform/core/trunk/xwiki-cache/xwiki-cache-jbosscache/src/
test/java/org/xwiki/cache/jbosscache/JBossCacheCacheTest.java
Log:
XWIKI-1744: Use JBoss Cache by default in XWiki
* improve JBoss cache configuration loading
[snip]
public void
testCreateAndDestroyCacheLRUMaxEntries() throws
ComponentLookupException, Exception
{
- /*CacheFactory factory = getCacheFactory();
+ CacheFactory factory = getCacheFactory();
CacheConfiguration conf = new CacheConfiguration();
LRUEvictionConfiguration lec = new LRUEvictionConfiguration();
lec.setMaxEntries(1);
+ // Force JBoss eviction interval to the minimum
+
lec.put(JBossCacheCacheConfiguration.CONFX_EVICTION_WAKEUPINTERVAL,
1);
conf.put(LRUEvictionConfiguration.CONFIGURATIONID, lec);
Cache<Object> cache = factory.newCache(conf);
@@ -36,19 +39,24 @@
cache.set("key2", 2);
+ // Wait for the JBoss Eviction policy to be called
+ Thread.sleep(1000);
warning, warning, warning! (insert flashing lights here)
[snip]
assertEquals("value",
cache.get("key"));
- Thread.sleep(1000);
+ // Wait for the JBoss Eviction policy to be called
+ Thread.sleep(3000);
Same, but worse... :)
This reminds me of the setSpeed() in our selenium tests that I've
removed in the RMUI tests.
Note that I'm not proposing a solution since I have no clue and
haven't read the code yet.
BTW isn't it dangerous to switch cache implementation in a RC? I'd say
it is.... I don't even think we've tested it in any real instance so
I'd be -0 to do that before testing it in real for several days/week.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
26 Jun
26 Jun
9:37 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [xwiki-notifications] r10858 - in xwiki-platform/core/trunk/xwiki-cache/xwiki-cache-jbosscache/src: main/java/org/xwiki/cache/jbosscache/internal test/java/org/xwiki/cache/jbosscache
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 9:23 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On Jun 26, 2008, at 9:05 PM, tmortagne (SVN) wrote:
The way JBossCache eviction policy works it run in another thread and
is launched at an interval which can be less than 1s
Author: tmortagne
Date: 2008-06-26 21:05:24 +0200 (Thu, 26 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 10858
Modified:
xwiki-platform/core/trunk/xwiki-cache/xwiki-cache-jbosscache/src/
main/java/org/xwiki/cache/jbosscache/internal/
JBossCacheCacheConfiguration.java
xwiki-platform/core/trunk/xwiki-cache/xwiki-cache-jbosscache/src/
test/java/org/xwiki/cache/jbosscache/JBossCacheCacheTest.java
Log:
XWIKI-1744: Use JBoss Cache by default in XWiki
* improve JBoss cache configuration loading
[snip]
public void
testCreateAndDestroyCacheLRUMaxEntries() throws
ComponentLookupException, Exception
{
- /*CacheFactory factory = getCacheFactory();
+ CacheFactory factory = getCacheFactory();
CacheConfiguration conf = new CacheConfiguration();
LRUEvictionConfiguration lec = new LRUEvictionConfiguration();
lec.setMaxEntries(1);
+ // Force JBoss eviction interval to the minimum
+
lec.put(JBossCacheCacheConfiguration.CONFX_EVICTION_WAKEUPINTERVAL,
1);
conf.put(LRUEvictionConfiguration.CONFIGURATIONID, lec);
Cache<Object> cache = factory.newCache(conf);
@@ -36,19 +39,24 @@
cache.set("key2", 2);
+ // Wait for the JBoss Eviction policy to be called
+ Thread.sleep(1000);
warning, warning, warning! (insert flashing lights here)
[snip]
assertEquals("value",
cache.get("key"));
- Thread.sleep(1000);
+ // Wait for the JBoss Eviction policy to be called
+ Thread.sleep(3000);
Same, but worse... :)
This reminds me of the setSpeed() in our selenium tests that I've
removed in the RMUI tests.
Note that I'm not proposing a solution since I have no clue and
haven't read the code yet.
BTW isn't it dangerous to switch cache implementation in a RC? I'd say
it is.... I don't even think we've tested it in any real instance so
I'd be -0 to do that before testing it in real for several days/week.
WDYT?
For now I did not switch anything because as you said the JBossCache
implementation has not been sufficiently tested in the real world.
I just wanted to attach this commit to a context because it's too
little to deserve it's own jira issue.
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
9:37 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [xwiki-notifications] r10858 - in xwiki-platform/core/trunk/xwiki-cache/xwiki-cache-jbosscache/src: main/java/org/xwiki/cache/jbosscache/internal test/java/org/xwiki/cache/jbosscache
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 9:23 PM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
can=can't
On Jun 26, 2008, at 9:05 PM, tmortagne (SVN) wrote:
The way JBossCache eviction policy works it run in another thread and
is launched at an interval which can be less than 1s Author: tmortagne
Date: 2008-06-26 21:05:24 +0200 (Thu, 26 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 10858
Modified:
xwiki-platform/core/trunk/xwiki-cache/xwiki-cache-jbosscache/src/
main/java/org/xwiki/cache/jbosscache/internal/
JBossCacheCacheConfiguration.java
xwiki-platform/core/trunk/xwiki-cache/xwiki-cache-jbosscache/src/
test/java/org/xwiki/cache/jbosscache/JBossCacheCacheTest.java
Log:
XWIKI-1744: Use JBoss Cache by default in XWiki
* improve JBoss cache configuration loading
[snip]
public void
testCreateAndDestroyCacheLRUMaxEntries() throws
ComponentLookupException, Exception
{
- /*CacheFactory factory = getCacheFactory();
+ CacheFactory factory = getCacheFactory();
CacheConfiguration conf = new CacheConfiguration();
LRUEvictionConfiguration lec = new LRUEvictionConfiguration();
lec.setMaxEntries(1);
+ // Force JBoss eviction interval to the minimum
+
lec.put(JBossCacheCacheConfiguration.CONFX_EVICTION_WAKEUPINTERVAL,
1);
conf.put(LRUEvictionConfiguration.CONFIGURATIONID, lec);
Cache<Object> cache = factory.newCache(conf);
@@ -36,19 +39,24 @@
cache.set("key2", 2);
+ // Wait for the JBoss Eviction policy to be called
+ Thread.sleep(1000);
warning, warning, warning! (insert flashing lights here)
[snip]
assertEquals("value",
cache.get("key"));
- Thread.sleep(1000);
+ // Wait for the JBoss Eviction policy to be called
+ Thread.sleep(3000);
Same, but worse... :)
This reminds me of the setSpeed() in our selenium tests that I've
removed in the RMUI tests.
Note that I'm not proposing a solution since I have no clue and
haven't read the code yet.
BTW isn't it dangerous to switch cache implementation in a RC? I'd say
it is.... I don't even think we've tested it in any real instance so
I'd be -0 to do that before testing it in real for several days/week.
WDYT?
For now I did not switch anything because as you said the JBossCache
implementation has not been sufficiently tested in the real world.
I just wanted to attach this commit to a context because it's too
little to deserve it's own jira issue.
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
9:45 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [xwiki-notifications] r10858 - in xwiki-platform/core/trunk/xwiki-cache/xwiki-cache-jbosscache/src: main/java/org/xwiki/cache/jbosscache/internal test/java/org/xwiki/cache/jbosscache
On Jun 26, 2008, at 9:37 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
[snip]
oh ok I was tricked by the issue title...
Thanks
-Vincent
BTW isn't
it dangerous to switch cache implementation in a RC? I'd
say
it is.... I don't even think we've tested it in any real instance so
I'd be -0 to do that before testing it in real for several days/week.
WDYT?
For now I did not switch anything because as you said the JBossCache
implementation has not been sufficiently tested in the real world.
I just wanted to attach this commit to a context because it's too
little to deserve it's own jira issue.
27 Jun
27 Jun
9:55 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [xwiki-notifications] r10858 - in xwiki-platform/core/trunk/xwiki-cache/xwiki-cache-jbosscache/src: main/java/org/xwiki/cache/jbosscache/internal test/java/org/xwiki/cache/jbosscache
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On Jun 26, 2008, at 9:37 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
[snip]
oh ok I was tricked by the issue title...
No problem it was not so clear ;)
BTW
isn't it dangerous to switch cache implementation in a RC? I'd
say
it is.... I don't even think we've tested it in any real instance so
I'd be -0 to do that before testing it in real for several days/week.
WDYT?
For now I did not switch anything because as you said the JBossCache
implementation has not been sufficiently tested in the real world.
I just wanted to attach this commit to a context because it's too
little to deserve it's own jira issue.
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
5978
days inactive
5979
days old
4 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Thomas Mortagne -
Vincent Massol