21 Dec
2009
21 Dec
'09
10:29 a.m.
Hi devs,
I'm still working on the Model Reference domain. We've brainstormed
with Thomas and we'd like to propose replacing the current
ModelContext.getCurrentDocumentName() by
ModelContext.getCurrentEntityReference() (which returns an
EntityReference).
The idea is that a URL could target a document but also a wiki only
(e.g the REST API odes that), or a given space only, or even an object
or a property. This would mean we would need to have
getCurrentDocumentReference() in addition to all the others:
getCurrentWikiReference(), getCurrentSpaceReference(). It would also
mean a lot of them would be set to null. Last it would mean different
ways to access the same information (e.g.
getCurrentDocumentReference.getWikiReference() vs
getCurrentWikiReference()).
We would also add a EntityReference.extractReference(EntityType type)
method in order to make it easy to extract information from the a
reference path.
For example to extract the Wiki from an entity reference:
WikiReference wikiRef =
context.getCurrentEntityReference(EntityType.WIKI);
if (wikiRef != null) ....
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
21 Dec
21 Dec
10:46 a.m.
+1
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:29, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
I'm still working on the Model Reference domain. We've brainstormed
with Thomas and we'd like to propose replacing the current
ModelContext.getCurrentDocumentName() by
ModelContext.getCurrentEntityReference() (which returns an
EntityReference).
The idea is that a URL could target a document but also a wiki only
(e.g the REST API odes that), or a given space only, or even an object
or a property. This would mean we would need to have
getCurrentDocumentReference() in addition to all the others:
getCurrentWikiReference(), getCurrentSpaceReference(). It would also
mean a lot of them would be set to null. Last it would mean different
ways to access the same information (e.g.
getCurrentDocumentReference.getWikiReference() vs
getCurrentWikiReference()).
We would also add a EntityReference.extractReference(EntityType type)
method in order to make it easy to extract information from the a
reference path.
For example to extract the Wiki from an entity reference:
WikiReference wikiRef =
context.getCurrentEntityReference(EntityType.WIKI);
if (wikiRef != null) ....
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
10:47 a.m.
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:29, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
I'm still working on the Model Reference domain. We've brainstormed
with Thomas and we'd like to propose replacing the current
ModelContext.getCurrentDocumentName() by
ModelContext.getCurrentEntityReference() (which returns an
EntityReference).
The idea is that a URL could target a document but also a wiki only
(e.g the REST API odes that), or a given space only, or even an object
or a property. This would mean we would need to have
getCurrentDocumentReference() in addition to all the others:
getCurrentWikiReference(), getCurrentSpaceReference(). It would also
mean a lot of them would be set to null. Last it would mean different
ways to access the same information (e.g.
getCurrentDocumentReference.getWikiReference() vs
getCurrentWikiReference()).
Note that another point was that we need to make sure the current
space is consistent with the current wiki.
We would also add a EntityReference.extractReference(EntityType type)
method in order to make it easy to extract information from the a
reference path.
For example to extract the Wiki from an entity reference:
WikiReference wikiRef =
context.getCurrentEntityReference(EntityType.WIKI);
if (wikiRef != null) ....
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
10:47 a.m.
+1
On 12/21/09 10:29 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi devs,
I'm still working on the Model Reference domain. We've brainstormed
with Thomas and we'd like to propose replacing the current
ModelContext.getCurrentDocumentName() by
ModelContext.getCurrentEntityReference() (which returns an
EntityReference).
The idea is that a URL could target a document but also a wiki only
(e.g the REST API odes that), or a given space only, or even an object
or a property. This would mean we would need to have
getCurrentDocumentReference() in addition to all the others:
getCurrentWikiReference(), getCurrentSpaceReference(). It would also
mean a lot of them would be set to null. Last it would mean different
ways to access the same information (e.g.
getCurrentDocumentReference.getWikiReference() vs
getCurrentWikiReference()).
We would also add a EntityReference.extractReference(EntityType type)
method in order to make it easy to extract information from the a
reference path.
For example to extract the Wiki from an entity reference:
WikiReference wikiRef =
context.getCurrentEntityReference(EntityType.WIKI);
if (wikiRef != null) ....
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
6:10 p.m.
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
I'm still working on the Model Reference domain. We've brainstormed
with Thomas and we'd like to propose replacing the current
ModelContext.getCurrentDocumentName() by
ModelContext.getCurrentEntityReference() (which returns an
EntityReference).
The idea is that a URL could target a document but also a wiki only
(e.g the REST API odes that), or a given space only, or even an object
or a property. This would mean we would need to have
getCurrentDocumentReference() in addition to all the others:
getCurrentWikiReference(), getCurrentSpaceReference(). It would also
mean a lot of them would be set to null. Last it would mean different
ways to access the same information (e.g.
getCurrentDocumentReference.getWikiReference() vs
getCurrentWikiReference()).
We would also add a EntityReference.extractReference(EntityType type)
method in order to make it easy to extract information from the a
reference path.
For example to extract the Wiki from an entity reference:
WikiReference wikiRef =
context.getCurrentEntityReference(EntityType.WIKI);
if (wikiRef != null) ....
+1
May be we can avoid the enum type by using generics?
<T extends EntityReference> T getCurrentEntityReference();
Not sure if this is a good practice though.
- Asiri
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
6:53 p.m.
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 18:10, Asiri Rathnayake
<asiri.rathnayake(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Generic does not exist in the bytecode so impossible to know that you
want the EntityType.WIKI if you don't explicitly ask for it.
Hi devs,
I'm still working on the Model Reference domain. We've brainstormed
with Thomas and we'd like to propose replacing the current
ModelContext.getCurrentDocumentName() by
ModelContext.getCurrentEntityReference() (which returns an
EntityReference).
The idea is that a URL could target a document but also a wiki only
(e.g the REST API odes that), or a given space only, or even an object
or a property. This would mean we would need to have
getCurrentDocumentReference() in addition to all the others:
getCurrentWikiReference(), getCurrentSpaceReference(). It would also
mean a lot of them would be set to null. Last it would mean different
ways to access the same information (e.g.
getCurrentDocumentReference.getWikiReference() vs
getCurrentWikiReference()).
We would also add a EntityReference.extractReference(EntityType type)
method in order to make it easy to extract information from the a
reference path.
For example to extract the Wiki from an entity reference:
WikiReference wikiRef =
context.getCurrentEntityReference(EntityType.WIKI);
if (wikiRef != null) ....
+1
May be we can avoid the enum type by using generics?
<T extends EntityReference> T getCurrentEntityReference();
Not sure if this is a good practice though.
- Asiri
--
Thomas Mortagne
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
7:31 p.m.
Hi Thomas,
Right. Inside the method we'd have no clue what the client code is
requesting.
Would be cool if we can somehow not depend on the EntityReference
implementation type within the getCurrentEntityReference() method (thereby
not having to know which type the user wants but just cast and return what
is available). But I don't know if this is possible, and this would still
mean having to do an unsafe cast like:
EntityReference ref = ....;
return (T) ref;
which is also not that good.
Thanks.
- Asiri
May be we can
avoid the enum type by using generics?
<T extends EntityReference> T getCurrentEntityReference();
Not sure if this is a good practice though.
Generic does not exist in the bytecode so impossible to know that you
want the EntityType.WIKI if you don't explicitly ask for it.
- Asiri
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
7:56 p.m.
On 12/21/2009 07:31 PM, Asiri Rathnayake wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Right. Inside the method we'd have no clue what the client code is
requesting.
Would be cool if we can somehow not depend on the EntityReference
implementation type within the getCurrentEntityReference() method (thereby
not having to know which type the user wants but just cast and return what
is available). But I don't know if this is possible, and this would still
mean having to do an unsafe cast like:
EntityReference ref = ....;
return (T) ref;
which is also not that good.
private Map<Class<T>, T> currentReferences populated at the start of the
request;
public <T extends EntityReference> T getCurrentEntityReference(Class<T>
clazz) {
return currentReferences.get(clazz);
}
Could this work?
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
May be we
can avoid the enum type by using generics?
<T extends EntityReference> T getCurrentEntityReference();
Not sure if this is a good practice though.
Generic does not exist in the bytecode so impossible to know that you
want the EntityType.WIKI if you don't explicitly ask for it.
5436
days inactive
5436
days old
7 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Asiri Rathnayake -
Jerome Velociter -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Thomas Mortagne -
Vincent Massol