+1, sounds good
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.org> wrote:
  On 12/08/2012 09:12 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
  Hi devs,
 This week end I've been (at last) experimenting with Mockito ( 
http://docs.mockito.googlecode.com/hg/latest/org/mockito/Mockito.html)
 and it's been successful so far :)
 I've converted a first test to use it as a demonstrator of its power ( 
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XCOMMONS-316):
  
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-commons/commit/7b45b48de1c6915294736dfddda74…
  
 > I'd like to propose to start
using it and start writing our tests with
 it since:
  * It's very easy to use. I was able to very
simply migrate an existing 
 test to it
  * It makes our tests much more readable to read
and maintain IMO because 
 1) there's less boilerplate code, 2) it provides
default values for mocks
 and 3) no more of ugly expectations syntax
  * It's powerful, just see 
http://docs.mockito.googlecode.com/hg/latest/org/mockito/Mockito.html
  * It's actively maintained and developed, see
 http://code.google.com/p/mockito/downloads/list and
 
http://code.google.com/p/mockito/source/list and
 
http://code.google.com/p/mockito/people/list
  
 > After we've written/converted a
few tests (let's say in 1 month or so)
 we can really decide if we like it and make it our official mocking tool or
 if we should go back to JMock (but I have little doubts ;)).
  
 > WDYT?
 Looks good, +1.
 --
 Sergiu Dumitriu
 
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
 _______________________________________________
 devs mailing list
 devs(a)xwiki.org
 
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs