17 Apr
2008
17 Apr
'08
2:46 p.m.
Hi,
Since Maven 2.0.9 is now released and it works with our build we
should standardize on it rather than using a"non-official" 2.1
snapshot version.
I'm thus proposing to move the maven version we use for Continuum on
Maven 2.0.9 and to change the Building page to remove our snapshot
version and change the text to say that to build XWiki you need Maven
2.0.9 or greater.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
17 Apr
17 Apr
2:51 p.m.
+1
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi,
Since Maven 2.0.9 is now released and it works with our build we
should standardize on it rather than using a"non-official" 2.1
snapshot version.
I'm thus proposing to move the maven version we use for Continuum on
Maven 2.0.9 and to change the Building page to remove our snapshot
version and change the text to say that to build XWiki you need Maven
2.0.9 or greater.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Jean-Vincent Drean
3:10 p.m.
+1
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi,
Since Maven 2.0.9 is now released and it works with our build we
should standardize on it rather than using a"non-official" 2.1
snapshot version.
I'm thus proposing to move the maven version we use for Continuum on
Maven 2.0.9 and to change the Building page to remove our snapshot
version and change the text to say that to build XWiki you need Maven
2.0.9 or greater.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
3:32 p.m.
+1 indeed.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi,
Since Maven 2.0.9 is now released and it works with our build we
should standardize on it rather than using a"non-official" 2.1
snapshot version.
I'm thus proposing to move the maven version we use for Continuum on
Maven 2.0.9 and to change the Building page to remove our snapshot
version and change the text to say that to build XWiki you need Maven
2.0.9 or greater.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
4:26 p.m.
+1
Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi,
Since Maven 2.0.9 is now released and it works with our build we
should standardize on it rather than using a"non-official" 2.1
snapshot version.
I'm thus proposing to move the maven version we use for Continuum on
Maven 2.0.9 and to change the Building page to remove our snapshot
version and change the text to say that to build XWiki you need Maven
2.0.9 or greater.
WDYT?
--
Artem Melentyev
5:36 p.m.
-1
I tried it first to see if it works. On a clean trunks, the first build
was wrong, meaning that the final distribution zip didn't have any skins
and the database directory wasn't found, although it was there. Tried
again with the 2.1 snapshot a clean + install, and it worked fine. Tried
again with 2.0.9 a clean + install and it worked fine. Then I cleaned
the local repo (only the xwiki packages) and built again, using 2.0.9,
and I got a broken build.
Can somebody else reproduce this?
Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi,
Since Maven 2.0.9 is now released and it works with our build we
should standardize on it rather than using a"non-official" 2.1
snapshot version.
I'm thus proposing to move the maven version we use for Continuum on
Maven 2.0.9 and to change the Building page to remove our snapshot
version and change the text to say that to build XWiki you need Maven
2.0.9 or greater.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
10:39 p.m.
I've reproduced it:
$ cd xwiki-product-enterprise/database/
$ mvn clean install
produce empty hsql db.
while
$ cd xwiki-product-enterprise/database/hsql
$ mvn clean install
works fine.
looks like http://markmail.org/message/cmqtvc2neuux5spn
It skip these goals:
[INFO] [xwiki-xar:unxar]
[INFO] [xwiki-packager-plugin:import]
So I change my vote to -1.
Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
-1
I tried it first to see if it works. On a clean trunks, the first build
was wrong, meaning that the final distribution zip didn't have any skins
and the database directory wasn't found, although it was there. Tried
again with the 2.1 snapshot a clean + install, and it worked fine. Tried
again with 2.0.9 a clean + install and it worked fine. Then I cleaned
the local repo (only the xwiki packages) and built again, using 2.0.9,
and I got a broken build.
Can somebody else reproduce this?
--
Artem Melentyev
19 Apr
19 Apr
6:48 p.m.
Ok i voted without testing it ( i thought it works as advertised ).
Anyway this is my experience,
`mvn clean install` just after upgrading - No build errors but missing
skins.
`mvn clean install` after clearing com.xpn & org.xwiki packages from local
repo - No build errors but still missing skins.
Is there a way we can fix this skin issue ? if we can somehow fix it, it
would be nice to standardize on maven 2.0.9. I hope this proposal is not
dropped yet.
Thanks.
- Asiri
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
-1
I tried it first to see if it works. On a clean trunks, the first build
was wrong, meaning that the final distribution zip didn't have any skins
and the database directory wasn't found, although it was there. Tried
again with the 2.1 snapshot a clean + install, and it worked fine. Tried
again with 2.0.9 a clean + install and it worked fine. Then I cleaned
the local repo (only the xwiki packages) and built again, using 2.0.9,
and I got a broken build.
Can somebody else reproduce this?
Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi,
Since Maven 2.0.9 is now released and it works with our build we
should standardize on it rather than using a"non-official" 2.1
snapshot version.
I'm thus proposing to move the maven version we use for Continuum on
Maven 2.0.9 and to change the Building page to remove our snapshot
version and change the text to say that to build XWiki you need Maven
2.0.9 or greater.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
6:57 p.m.
No the proposal is not dropped. We just need to make it work with
2.0.9. I haven't had the time to look into this but don't wait for me
to find the solution :)
Thanks
-Vincent
On Apr 19, 2008, at 6:48 PM, Asiri Rathnayake wrote:
Ok i voted without testing it ( i thought it works as
advertised ).
Anyway this is my experience,
`mvn clean install` just after upgrading - No build errors but missing
skins.
`mvn clean install` after clearing com.xpn & org.xwiki packages from
local
repo - No build errors but still missing skins.
Is there a way we can fix this skin issue ? if we can somehow fix
it, it
would be nice to standardize on maven 2.0.9. I hope this proposal is
not
dropped yet.
Thanks.
- Asiri
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
-1
I tried it first to see if it works. On a clean trunks, the first
build
was wrong, meaning that the final distribution zip didn't have any
skins
and the database directory wasn't found, although it was there. Tried
again with the 2.1 snapshot a clean + install, and it worked fine.
Tried
again with 2.0.9 a clean + install and it worked fine. Then I cleaned
the local repo (only the xwiki packages) and built again, using
2.0.9,
and I got a broken build.
Can somebody else reproduce this?
Vincent Massol wrote:
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs Hi,
Since Maven 2.0.9 is now released and it works with our build we
should standardize on it rather than using a"non-official" 2.1
snapshot version.
I'm thus proposing to move the maven version we use for Continuum on
Maven 2.0.9 and to change the Building page to remove our snapshot
version and change the text to say that to build XWiki you need
Maven
2.0.9 or greater.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
20 Apr
20 Apr
8:57 a.m.
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
No the proposal is not dropped. We just need to make
it work with
2.0.9. I haven't had the time to look into this but don't wait for me
to find the solution :)
May the solution is mentioned here;
http://maven.apache.org/release-notes.html under the topic "*Changes that
may affect existing builds*". But I'm not a maven expert. I only know how to
use it :)
Thanks.
- Asiri
Thanks
-Vincent
On Apr 19, 2008, at 6:48 PM, Asiri Rathnayake wrote:
Ok i voted without testing it ( i thought it
works as advertised ).
Anyway this is my experience,
`mvn clean install` just after upgrading - No build errors but missing
skins.
`mvn clean install` after clearing com.xpn & org.xwiki packages from
local
repo - No build errors but still missing skins.
Is there a way we can fix this skin issue ? if we can somehow fix
it, it
would be nice to standardize on maven 2.0.9. I hope this proposal is
not
dropped yet.
Thanks.
- Asiri
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-1
I tried it first to see if it works. On a clean trunks, the first
build
was wrong, meaning that the final distribution zip didn't have any
skins
and the database directory wasn't found, although it was there. Tried
again with the 2.1 snapshot a clean + install, and it worked fine.
Tried
again with 2.0.9 a clean + install and it worked fine. Then I cleaned
the local repo (only the xwiki packages) and built again, using
2.0.9,
and I got a broken build.
Can somebody else reproduce this?
Vincent Massol wrote:
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs Hi,
Since Maven 2.0.9 is now released and it works with our build we
should standardize on it rather than using a"non-official" 2.1
snapshot version.
I'm thus proposing to move the maven version we use for Continuum on
Maven 2.0.9 and to change the Building page to remove our snapshot
version and change the text to say that to build XWiki you need
Maven
2.0.9 or greater.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
24 Apr
24 Apr
5:30 p.m.
Hi, devs.
I found the cause:
"prepare-package" phase is supported only in maven 2.1
(look at
http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-lifecycle.h…)
I changed all "prepare-package" phases to "package" in xe/database
and to "test" in web/standard ("package" works incorrectly here):
http://rafb.net/p/SLjVW226.html
maven-2.0.9 produce correct XE distribution now.
Vincent Massol wrote:
No the proposal is not dropped. We just need to make
it work with
2.0.9. I haven't had the time to look into this but don't wait for me
to find the solution :)
--
Artem Melentyev
28 Apr
28 Apr
7:32 p.m.
Hi, devs.
The build (at trunk) is working on maven-2.0.9 and our 2.1-SNAPSHOT now.
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-2346
Please install maven-2.0.9 and test the build.
Artem Melentyev wrote:
I found the cause:
"prepare-package" phase is supported only in maven 2.1
(look at
http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-lifecycle.h…)
I changed all "prepare-package" phases to "package" in xe/database
and to "test" in web/standard ("package" works incorrectly here):
http://rafb.net/p/SLjVW226.html
maven-2.0.9 produce correct XE distribution now.
Vincent Massol wrote:
> No the proposal is not dropped. We just need to make it work with
> 2.0.9. I haven't had the time to look into this but don't wait for me
> to find the solution :)
--
Artem Melentyev
9:10 p.m.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Artem Melentyev <amelentev(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi, devs.
The build (at trunk) is working on maven-2.0.9 and our 2.1-SNAPSHOT now.
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-2346
Please install maven-2.0.9 and test the build.
So far nothing wrong. How can i be certain whether switching to maven-2.0.9
has caused no defects ? I mean, is there a compatibility test or something
like that ? *doubtful*
Thanks.
- Asiri
Artem Melentyev wrote:
I found the cause:
"prepare-package" phase is supported only in maven 2.1
(look at
http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-lifecycle.h…
)
I changed all "prepare-package" phases to "package" in xe/database
and to "test" in web/standard ("package" works incorrectly here):
http://rafb.net/p/SLjVW226.html
maven-2.0.9 produce correct XE distribution now.
Vincent Massol wrote:
> No the proposal is not dropped. We just need to make it work with
> 2.0.9. I haven't had the time to look into this but don't wait for me
> to find the solution :)
--
Artem Melentyev
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
9:14 p.m.
On Apr 28, 2008, at 9:10 PM, Asiri Rathnayake wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Artem Melentyev
<amelentev(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Just run the build. If it says successful, it works (tests are
executed during the build). This is the best test we have :)
-Vincent
Hi, devs.
The build (at trunk) is working on maven-2.0.9 and our 2.1-SNAPSHOT
now.
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-2346
Please install maven-2.0.9 and test the build.
So far nothing wrong. How can i be certain whether switching to
maven-2.0.9
has caused no defects ? I mean, is there a compatibility test or
something
like that ? *doubtful* Artem
Melentyev wrote:
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs I found the cause:
"prepare-package" phase is supported only in maven 2.1
(look at
http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-lifecycle.h…
)
I changed all "prepare-package" phases to "package" in xe/database
and to "test" in web/standard ("package" works incorrectly here):
http://rafb.net/p/SLjVW226.html
maven-2.0.9 produce correct XE distribution now.
Vincent Massol wrote:
> No the proposal is not dropped. We just need to make it work with
> 2.0.9. I haven't had the time to look into this but don't wait
> for me
> to find the solution :)
--
Artem Melentyev
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
9:45 p.m.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On Apr 28, 2008, at 9:10 PM, Asiri Rathnayake wrote:
In that case, i have a clean build .... :)
Thanks.
- Asiri
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Artem
Melentyev
<amelentev(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Just run the build. If it says successful, it works (tests are
executed during the build). This is the best test we have :)
Hi, devs.
The build (at trunk) is working on maven-2.0.9 and our 2.1-SNAPSHOT
now.
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-2346
Please install maven-2.0.9 and test the build.
So far nothing wrong. How can i be certain whether switching to
maven-2.0.9
has caused no defects ? I mean, is there a compatibility test or
something
like that ? *doubtful*
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> Artem Melentyev wrote:
>> I found the cause:
>>
>> "prepare-package" phase is supported only in maven 2.1
>> (look at
>>
>
http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-lifecycle.h…
)
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
I changed all "prepare-package" phases to "package" in xe/database
and to "test" in web/standard ("package" works incorrectly here):
http://rafb.net/p/SLjVW226.html
maven-2.0.9 produce correct XE distribution now.
Vincent Massol wrote:
> No the proposal is not dropped. We just need to make it work with
> 2.0.9. I haven't had the time to look into this but don't wait
> for me
> to find the solution :)
--
Artem Melentyev
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
29 Apr
29 Apr
11:19 a.m.
Building fine with maven-2.0.9 on windows XP.
JV.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Artem Melentyev <amelentev(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, devs.
The build (at trunk) is working on maven-2.0.9 and our 2.1-SNAPSHOT now.
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-2346
Please install maven-2.0.9 and test the build.
Artem Melentyev wrote:
--
Jean-Vincent Drean
I found the cause:
"prepare-package" phase is supported only in maven 2.1
(look at
http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-lifecycle.h…)
I changed all "prepare-package" phases to "package" in xe/database
and to "test" in web/standard ("package" works incorrectly here):
http://rafb.net/p/SLjVW226.html
maven-2.0.9 produce correct XE distribution now.
Vincent Massol wrote:
> No the proposal is not dropped. We just need to make it work with
> 2.0.9. I haven't had the time to look into this but don't wait for me
> to find the solution :)
--
Artem Melentyev
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
5 May
5 May
6:10 p.m.
Artem Melentyev wrote:
Hi, devs.
The build (at trunk) is working on maven-2.0.9 and our 2.1-SNAPSHOT now.
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-2346
Please install maven-2.0.9 and test the build.
Tested XE, works fine. The build should also be updated for the other
products, as XEM contains an empty database, and Watch contains only the
default XE pages. The Curriki build failed for me, but not due to maven
errors (somebody should clean-up this product so that it can be easily
deployed).
Still, older branches/tags will not be build-able; isn't that an issue?
Artem Melentyev wrote:
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
I found the cause:
"prepare-package" phase is supported only in maven 2.1
(look at
http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-lifecycle.h…)
I changed all "prepare-package" phases to "package" in xe/database
and to "test" in web/standard ("package" works incorrectly here):
http://rafb.net/p/SLjVW226.html
maven-2.0.9 produce correct XE distribution now.
Vincent Massol wrote:
> No the proposal is not dropped. We just need to make it work with
> 2.0.9. I haven't had the time to look into this but don't wait for me
> to find the solution :)
9 May
9 May
9:32 a.m.
Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
Artem Melentyev wrote:
Fixed for 1.4 branch and products.
I think old tags don't need to fix.
--
Artem Melentyev
The build (at trunk) is working on maven-2.0.9
and our 2.1-SNAPSHOT now.
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-2346
Please install maven-2.0.9 and test the build.
Tested XE, works fine. The build should also be updated for the other
products, as XEM contains an empty database, and Watch contains only the
default XE pages. The Curriki build failed for me, but not due to maven
errors (somebody should clean-up this product so that it can be easily
deployed).
Still, older branches/tags will not be build-able; isn't that an issue?
6027
days inactive
6049
days old
17 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Artem Melentyev -
Asiri Rathnayake -
Jean-Vincent Drean -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Thomas Mortagne -
Vincent Massol