On 12 Mar 2018, at 12:10, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
<valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 1:03 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi Caty,
On 28 Feb 2018, at 17:41, Ecaterina Moraru
(Valica) <valicac(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi devs,
Here is a proposal for improving the drag&drop area for attachments and
having bulk actions in order to rapidly delete or download multiple
attachments:
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/IdeaBulkAttachments
Nice.
Some comments:
* I think I’d prefer a drop down menus to select the actions to do when
selecting one or several attachments (instead of icons put next to each
other)
Yeap, that is also a solution. I've listed the actions now in order to be
consistent with Comments tab actions + we don't have that many for now, but
adding more actions needs we switch to a dropdown.
* I don’t like too much the “Attachments” heading
since the Tab is already
about “Attachments”.
* From a technical implementation POV, I think we should use a styled LT
so that we can benefit from:
** filtering
** pagination (and allow supporting lots of attachments attached to a page)
** multi-select feature of the LT (when we implement it).
Well depends if we really want this dependency for all cases. Livetable is
kind of heavy as a component. Yes, it brings benefits, but also lots of
unwanted things. We don't use a livetable either in History. Not sure if
this is because of performance or because they haven't been revised in a
while.
We need it too there IMO :)
By “heavy” you probably mean UI-heavy. But we can style it to make it lightweight. We can
even imagine showing the LT tool bar (with the filter fields and pagination only when
mouse hovering over it or something like that, or a dropdown button to click to get to see
the bar).
I think we need to rationalize our work and make it a UI component we can use everywhere
there’s a potentially important list of items.
Thanks
-Vincent
Thanks for you feedback,
Caty
>
> In other words, I would work on the LT multi-action feature and use it for
> attachments.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Caty