30 Jan
2014
30 Jan
'14
2:34 p.m.
Hi,
Our RTF export has never been very good and is even crashing depending on the reader you
use (see for example http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-5251 ).
I propose to drop the RTF support without OO
Rationale:
* If a user really needs it he can make it work with an OO server connected to xwiki
* RTF is not really a mainstream format
* I don’t think we want to invest in fixing our RTF export
Here’s my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
30 Jan
30 Jan
2:48 p.m.
+1
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:34 PM, vincent(a)massol.net <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi,
Our RTF export has never been very good and is even crashing depending on the reader you
use (see for example http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-5251 ).
I propose to drop the RTF support without OO
Rationale:
* If a user really needs it he can make it work with an OO server connected to xwiki
* RTF is not really a mainstream format
* I don't think we want to invest in fixing our RTF export
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
2:50 p.m.
+1
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:34 PM, vincent(a)massol.net <vincent(a)massol.net>wrote;wrote:
Hi,
Our RTF export has never been very good and is even crashing depending on
the reader you use (see for example
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-5251 ).
I propose to drop the RTF support without OO
Rationale:
* If a user really needs it he can make it work with an OO server
connected to xwiki
* RTF is not really a mainstream format
* I don’t think we want to invest in fixing our RTF export
Here’s my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
2:55 p.m.
+1
Thanks,
Caty
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Denis Gervalle <dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
+1
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:34 PM, vincent(a)massol.net <vincent(a)massol.net
wrote:
Hi,
Our RTF export has never been very good and is even crashing depending on
the reader you use (see for example
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-5251 ).
I propose to drop the RTF support without OO
Rationale:
* If a user really needs it he can make it work with an OO server
connected to xwiki
* RTF is not really a mainstream format
* I don't think we want to invest in fixing our RTF export
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
3:06 p.m.
+1. FOP developers don't have the time or desire to maintain the RTF
output, so it's unlikely to improve. RTF is a limited format.
On the other hand it is the only editable file format that XWiki can
provide standalone. Some users do like the ability to get out a document
they can edit, but I guess it's OK to only expose this feature when an
OO backend is configured.
On 01/30/2014 08:34 AM, vincent(a)massol.net wrote:
Hi,
Our RTF export has never been very good and is even crashing depending on the reader you
use (see for example http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-5251 ).
I propose to drop the RTF support without OO
Rationale:
* If a user really needs it he can make it work with an OO server connected to xwiki
* RTF is not really a mainstream format
* I don’t think we want to invest in fixing our RTF export
Here’s my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
2 Feb
2 Feb
3:24 p.m.
Hello,
I remember wanting to propose this 2 years ago, but I can't remember why I
didn't do it exactly :)
So, here is my +1
Regards,
Sorin B.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
+1. FOP developers don't have the time or desire
to maintain the RTF
output, so it's unlikely to improve. RTF is a limited format.
On the other hand it is the only editable file format that XWiki can
provide standalone. Some users do like the ability to get out a document
they can edit, but I guess it's OK to only expose this feature when an
OO backend is configured.
On 01/30/2014 08:34 AM, vincent(a)massol.net wrote:
Hi,
Our RTF export has never been very good and is even crashing depending
on the
reader you use (see for example
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-5251 ).
I propose to drop the RTF support without OO
Rationale:
* If a user really needs it he can make it work with an OO server
connected to
xwiki
* RTF is not really a mainstream format
* I don't think we want to invest in fixing our RTF export
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
5:56 p.m.
+1
Thanks,
Caleb
On 01/30/2014 08:34 AM, vincent(a)massol.net wrote:
Hi,
Our RTF export has never been very good and is even crashing depending on the reader you
use (see for example http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-5251 ).
I propose to drop the RTF support without OO
Rationale:
* If a user really needs it he can make it work with an OO server connected to xwiki
* RTF is not really a mainstream format
* I don’t think we want to invest in fixing our RTF export
Here’s my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
3 Feb
3 Feb
8:46 a.m.
+1,
Thanks,
Marius
On Jan 30, 2014 3:34 PM, "vincent(a)massol.net" <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi,
Our RTF export has never been very good and is even crashing depending on
the
reader you use (see for example http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-5251
).
I propose to drop the RTF support without OO
Rationale:
* If a user really needs it he can make it work with an OO server
connected to
xwiki
* RTF is not really a mainstream format
* I don't think we want to invest in fixing our RTF export
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
9:31 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Stop supporting export to RTF without an open office server (SUMMARY)
Here’s the VOTE results: 7 +1 (and another non-binding +1), 0 +0 and 0 -1
Thus the VOTE is passed and I’ve created:
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-9972
Thanks
-Vincent
On 3 Feb 2014 at 08:46:29, Marius Dumitru Florea (mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com) wrote:
+1,
Thanks,
Marius
On Jan 30, 2014 3:34 PM, "vincent(a)massol.net" <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi,
Our RTF export has never been very good and is even crashing depending on
the
reader you use (see for example http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-5251
).
I propose to drop the RTF support without OO
Rationale:
* If a user really needs it he can make it work with an OO server
connected to
xwiki
* RTF is not really a mainstream format
* I don't think we want to invest in fixing our RTF export
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
5:18 p.m.
+1,
Thanks,
Eduard
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
+1,
Thanks,
Marius
On Jan 30, 2014 3:34 PM, "vincent(a)massol.net" <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
Hi,
Our RTF export has never been very good and is even crashing depending on
the
reader you use (see for example
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-5251
).
I propose to drop the RTF support without OO
Rationale:
* If a user really needs it he can make it work with an OO server
connected to
xwiki
* RTF is not really a mainstream format
* I don't think we want to invest in fixing our RTF export
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
3975
days inactive
3979
days old
9 comments
9 participants
participants (9)
-
Caleb James DeLisle -
Denis Gervalle -
Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) -
Eduard Moraru -
Marius Dumitru Florea -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Sorin Burjan -
Thomas Mortagne -
vincent＠massol.net