11 Jun
2010
11 Jun
'10
9:03 a.m.
Hi devs,
I'm wondering why we haven't moved to using XQL instead of HQL.
Any reason?
If not, I'd like to suggest we start using it everywhere we currently use HQL since
XWQL since is much nicer. Also since we don't use it our users don't use it.
Additionally I'd like to propose that we move to a ScriptService to access the query
manager.
From Velocity you'd write the following to get a Query:
$services.query.xwql("....")
Note that the ScriptService implementation would replace the SecureQueryManager
implementation.
We would also deprecate XWiki.getQueryManager.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
11 Jun
11 Jun
9:53 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Why don't we use XWQL and the Query Manager + ScriptService
Is it secure?
The searchDocuments function has the benefit of having had a lot of security review.
Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi devs,
I'm wondering why we haven't moved to using XQL instead of HQL.
Any reason?
If not, I'd like to suggest we start using it everywhere we currently use HQL since
XWQL since is much nicer. Also since we don't use it our users don't use it.
Additionally I'd like to propose that we move to a ScriptService to access the query
manager.
From Velocity you'd write the following to get
a Query:
$services.query.xwql("....")
Note that the ScriptService implementation would replace the SecureQueryManager
implementation.
We would also deprecate XWiki.getQueryManager.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
10:08 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Why don't we use XWQL and the Query Manager + ScriptService
On Jun 11, 2010, at 9:53 AM, Caleb James DeLisle wrote:
Is it secure?
I don't feel that's a good enough reason not to use it since it would mean that we
would never use any new API. If we want to use it, we can review it from a security POV.
That said, it looks secure, see
http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/platform/core/trunk/xwiki-query/manager/…
The searchDocuments function has the benefit of having
had a lot of security review.
Well the Query Manager has had the benefit of being written after searchDocument, thus
inheriting from best practices.
Thanks
-Vincent
Vincent Massol wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> I'm wondering why we haven't moved to using XQL instead of HQL.
>
> Any reason?
>
> If not, I'd like to suggest we start using it everywhere we currently use HQL
since XWQL since is much nicer. Also since we don't use it our users don't use
it.
>
> Additionally I'd like to propose that we move to a ScriptService to access the
query manager.
>
>> From Velocity you'd write the following to get a Query:
> $services.query.xwql("....")
>
> Note that the ScriptService implementation would replace the SecureQueryManager
implementation.
>
> We would also deprecate XWiki.getQueryManager.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
11:13 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Why don't we use XWQL and the Query Manager + ScriptService
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 09:03, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
I'm wondering why we haven't moved to using XQL instead of HQL.
Any reason?
If not, I'd like to suggest we start using it everywhere we currently use HQL since
XWQL since is much nicer. Also since we don't use it our users don't use it.
Additionally I'd like to propose that we move to a ScriptService to access the query
manager.
From Velocity you'd write the following to get a Query:
$services.query.xwql("....")
Note that the ScriptService implementation would replace the SecureQueryManager
implementation.
We would also deprecate XWiki.getQueryManager.
WDYT?
I think the major issue is that nobody knows it very well and without
Artem to push on it and help we just forgot about it.
Also I think Artem was waiting JCR2 that was not release when he
started working on it to finish XQL implementation that was too
limited by JCR1.
But yes we should really use XQL if possible.
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
11:29 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Why don't we use XWQL and the Query Manager + ScriptService
On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 09:03, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
XWQL is not tied to JCR (the execution engine is Hibernate right now). It's tied to
JPQA but only at the grammar level (we have our grammer and our parser).
Why do you think it's not finished? from what I've seen it looks finished and it
worked well when I used it.
I only saw a potential grammar issue that you are forces to use "as" for a query
to be valid. For example:
"from doc.object(XWiki.XWikiUsers) as user"
(using "from doc.object(XWiki.XWikiUsers)" will not work)
Thanks
-Vincent
Hi devs,
I'm wondering why we haven't moved to using XQL instead of HQL.
Any reason?
If not, I'd like to suggest we start using it everywhere we currently use HQL since
XWQL since is much nicer. Also since we don't use it our users don't use it.
Additionally I'd like to propose that we move to a ScriptService to access the query
manager.
From Velocity you'd write the following to get a Query:
$services.query.xwql("....")
Note that the ScriptService implementation would replace the SecureQueryManager
implementation.
We would also deprecate XWiki.getQueryManager.
WDYT?
I think the major issue is that nobody knows it very well and without
Artem to push on it and help we just forgot about it.
Also I think Artem was waiting JCR2 that was not release when he
started working on it to finish XQL implementation that was too
limited by JCR1. But yes we should really use XQL if possible.
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
12:13 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Why don't we use XWQL and the Query Manager + ScriptService
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:29, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
I talked about XQL not the query manager. I tough JPQL was part of JCR.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 09:03, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
XWQL is not tied to JCR (the execution engine is Hibernate right now). It's tied to
JPQA but only at the grammar level (we have our grammer and our parser). Hi devs,
I'm wondering why we haven't moved to using XQL instead of HQL.
Any reason?
If not, I'd like to suggest we start using it everywhere we currently use HQL since
XWQL since is much nicer. Also since we don't use it our users don't use it.
Additionally I'd like to propose that we move to a ScriptService to access the query
manager.
From Velocity you'd write the following to get a Query:
$services.query.xwql("....")
Note that the ScriptService implementation would replace the SecureQueryManager
implementation.
We would also deprecate XWiki.getQueryManager.
WDYT?
I think the major issue is that nobody knows it very well and without
Artem to push on it and help we just forgot about it.
Also I think Artem was waiting JCR2 that was not release when he
started working on it to finish XQL implementation that was too
limited by JCR1.
Why do you think it's not finished? from what I've seen it looks finished and it
worked well when I used it.
I said "i think".
I only saw a potential grammar issue that you are forces to use "as" for a
query to be valid. For example:
"from doc.object(XWiki.XWikiUsers) as user"
(using "from doc.object(XWiki.XWikiUsers)" will not work)
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Thomas Mortagne
But yes we should really use XQL if possible.
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
12:17 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Why don't we use XWQL and the Query Manager + ScriptService
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:13, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:29, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Anyway my main point is that if we start to use it a lot it makes it
critical and we need somebody to take care of that since we will find
bugs for sure.
On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
I talked about XQL not the query manager. I tough JPQL was part of JCR.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 09:03, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
XWQL is not tied to JCR (the execution engine is Hibernate right now). It's tied to
JPQA but only at the grammar level (we have our grammer and our parser). Hi devs,
I'm wondering why we haven't moved to using XQL instead of HQL.
Any reason?
If not, I'd like to suggest we start using it everywhere we currently use HQL since
XWQL since is much nicer. Also since we don't use it our users don't use it.
Additionally I'd like to propose that we move to a ScriptService to access the query
manager.
From Velocity you'd write the following to get a Query:
$services.query.xwql("....")
Note that the ScriptService implementation would replace the SecureQueryManager
implementation.
We would also deprecate XWiki.getQueryManager.
WDYT?
I think the major issue is that nobody knows it very well and without
Artem to push on it and help we just forgot about it.
Also I think Artem was waiting JCR2 that was not release when he
started working on it to finish XQL implementation that was too
limited by JCR1.
Why do you think it's not finished? from what I've seen it looks finished and it
worked well when I used it.
I said "i think".
>
> I only saw a potential grammar issue that you are forces to use "as" for a
query to be valid. For example:
> "from doc.object(XWiki.XWikiUsers) as user"
>
> (using "from doc.object(XWiki.XWikiUsers)" will not work)
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Thomas Mortagne
But yes we should really use XQL if possible.
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
12:23 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Why don't we use XWQL and the Query Manager + ScriptService
On Jun 11, 2010, at 12:17 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:13, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Yes, I suggest we start using it right now (ie 2.4M2) for a few queries. We'll see how
well it works and can always rollback if needed.
-Vincent
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:29, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Anyway my main point is that if we start to use it a lot it makes it
critical and we need somebody to take care of that since we will find
bugs for sure.
On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
I talked about XQL not the query manager. I tough JPQL was part of JCR.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 09:03, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> I'm wondering why we haven't moved to using XQL instead of HQL.
>
> Any reason?
>
> If not, I'd like to suggest we start using it everywhere we currently use HQL
since XWQL since is much nicer. Also since we don't use it our users don't use
it.
>
> Additionally I'd like to propose that we move to a ScriptService to access the
query manager.
>
> From Velocity you'd write the following to get a Query:
> $services.query.xwql("....")
>
> Note that the ScriptService implementation would replace the SecureQueryManager
implementation.
>
> We would also deprecate XWiki.getQueryManager.
>
> WDYT?
I think the major issue is that nobody knows it very well and without
Artem to push on it and help we just forgot about it.
Also I think Artem was waiting JCR2 that was not release when he
started working on it to finish XQL implementation that was too
limited by JCR1.
XWQL is not tied to JCR (the execution engine is Hibernate right now). It's tied to
JPQA but only at the grammar level (we have our grammer and our parser).
Why do you think it's not finished? from what I've seen it looks finished and it
worked well when I used it.
I said "i think".
>
> I only saw a potential grammar issue that you are forces to use "as" for a
query to be valid. For example:
> "from doc.object(XWiki.XWikiUsers) as user"
>
> (using "from doc.object(XWiki.XWikiUsers)" will not work)
12:17 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Why don't we use XWQL and the Query Manager + ScriptService
On Jun 11, 2010, at 12:13 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:29, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Yes that's another question: IMO we should move the query plugin outside of the core
into the sandbox since I don't see a usage for it right now and xpath support should
be added to the query module.
Is anyone using it?
Thanks
-Vincent
On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
I talked about XQL not the query manager. I tough JPQL was part of JCR. On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 09:03, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
XWQL is not tied to JCR (the execution engine is Hibernate right now). It's tied to
JPQA but only at the grammar level (we have our grammer and our parser). Hi devs,
I'm wondering why we haven't moved to using XQL instead of HQL.
Any reason?
If not, I'd like to suggest we start using it everywhere we currently use HQL since
XWQL since is much nicer. Also since we don't use it our users don't use it.
Additionally I'd like to propose that we move to a ScriptService to access the query
manager.
From Velocity you'd write the following to get a Query:
$services.query.xwql("....")
Note that the ScriptService implementation would replace the SecureQueryManager
implementation.
We would also deprecate XWiki.getQueryManager.
WDYT?
I think the major issue is that nobody knows it very well and without
Artem to push on it and help we just forgot about it.
Also I think Artem was waiting JCR2 that was not release when he
started working on it to finish XQL implementation that was too
limited by JCR1.
Why do you think it's not finished? from what I've seen it looks finished and it
worked well when I used it.
I said "i think".
>
> I only saw a potential grammar issue that you are forces to use "as" for a
query to be valid. For example:
> "from doc.object(XWiki.XWikiUsers) as user"
>
> (using "from doc.object(XWiki.XWikiUsers)" will not work)
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>> But yes we should really use XQL if possible.
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent 
12:10 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Why don't we use XWQL and the Query Manager + ScriptService
+1
We need to get this more used. It's highly important for future
portability, and the queries are much nicer.
Ludovic
Le 11/06/10 09:03, Vincent Massol a écrit :
Hi devs,
I'm wondering why we haven't moved to using XQL instead of HQL.
Any reason?
If not, I'd like to suggest we start using it everywhere we currently use HQL since
XWQL since is much nicer. Also since we don't use it our users don't use it.
Additionally I'd like to propose that we move to a ScriptService to access the query
manager.
--
Ludovic Dubost
Blog: http://blog.ludovic.org/
XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com
Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost
From Velocity you'd write the following to
get a Query:
$services.query.xwql("....")
Note that the ScriptService implementation would replace the SecureQueryManager
implementation.
We would also deprecate XWiki.getQueryManager.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
3:28 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Why don't we use XWQL and the Query Manager + ScriptService
+1
I've used it a little recently when writting applications, and indeed it's way
nicer than our HQL way or querying.
Starting to use it inside XE will help us spot potential bugs and limitations.
+1 for the script service as well.
Jerome.
----- "Vincent Massol" <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
I'm wondering why we haven't moved to using XQL instead of HQL.
Any reason?
If not, I'd like to suggest we start using it everywhere we currently
use HQL since XWQL since is much nicer. Also since we don't use it
our users don't use it.
Additionally I'd like to propose that we move to a ScriptService to
access the query manager.
From Velocity you'd write the following to get a Query:
$services.query.xwql("....")
Note that the ScriptService implementation would replace the
SecureQueryManager implementation.
We would also deprecate XWiki.getQueryManager.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
21 Jun
21 Jun
1:09 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Why don't we use XWQL and the Query Manager + ScriptService
On Jun 11, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi devs,
I'm wondering why we haven't moved to using XQL instead of HQL.
Any reason?
If not, I'd like to suggest we start using it everywhere we currently use HQL since
XWQL since is much nicer. Also since we don't use it our users don't use it.
Additionally I'd like to propose that we move to a ScriptService to access the query
manager.
From Velocity you'd write the following to get a Query:
$services.query.xwql("....")
Note that the ScriptService implementation would replace the SecureQueryManager
implementation.
We would also deprecate XWiki.getQueryManager.
WDYT?
Done for the script service + documented at
http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/DevGuide/QueryGuide
Feedback welcome before the XE 2.4 final release if you want to change something.
Thanks
-Vincent
5201
days inactive
5211
days old
11 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Caleb James DeLisle -
Jerome Velociter -
Ludovic Dubost -
Thomas Mortagne -
Vincent Massol