4 Dec
2017
4 Dec
'17
1:35 p.m.
Hi devs,
By default the xwiki core committers maintain an “en” version of all translations and the
other languages are left to the community to maintain on l10n.xwiki.org
This mail is about deciding if our “en” version is “en_US” or “en_GB”.
I propose that we standardize on “en_US”. for example ApplicationResources.properties
would correspond to en_US.
I also propose that we add en_GB on l10n so that the community could maintain a UK version
if they want (it would fall back to en_US when there are no translations, which is a good
thing).
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
4 Dec
4 Dec
1:37 p.m.
The default should be en_US, for example when we need to make a decision
between using customize or customise.
Thanks,
Caty
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
By default the xwiki core committers maintain an “en” version of all
translations and the other languages are left to the community to maintain
on l10n.xwiki.org
This mail is about deciding if our “en” version is “en_US” or “en_GB”.
I propose that we standardize on “en_US”. for example ApplicationResources.properties
would correspond to en_US.
I also propose that we add en_GB on l10n so that the community could
maintain a UK version if they want (it would fall back to en_US when there
are no translations, which is a good thing).
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
1:38 p.m.
+1 for en_US
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
By default the xwiki core committers maintain an “en” version of all
translations and the other languages are left to the community to maintain
on l10n.xwiki.org
This mail is about deciding if our “en” version is “en_US” or “en_GB”.
I propose that we standardize on “en_US”. for example ApplicationResources.properties
would correspond to en_US.
I also propose that we add en_GB on l10n so that the community could
maintain a UK version if they want (it would fall back to en_US when there
are no translations, which is a good thing).
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
1:42 p.m.
+1 for en_US
Thanks,
Alex
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
+1 for en_US
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
By default the xwiki core committers maintain an “en” version of all
translations and the other languages are left to the community to
maintain
on l10n.xwiki.org
This mail is about deciding if our “en” version is “en_US” or “en_GB”.
I propose that we standardize on “en_US”. for example
ApplicationResources.properties
would correspond to en_US.
I also propose that we add en_GB on l10n so that the community could
maintain a UK version if they want (it would fall back to en_US when
there
are no translations, which is a good thing).
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
2:18 p.m.
+1 for en_US
Thanks,
Eduard
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Alex Cotiugă <alexandru.cotiuga(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
+1 for en_US
Thanks,
Alex
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
+1 for en_US
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
Hi devs,
By default the xwiki core committers maintain an “en” version of all
translations and the other languages are left to the community to
maintain
on l10n.xwiki.org
This mail is about deciding if our “en” version is “en_US” or “en_GB”.
I propose that we standardize on “en_US”. for example
ApplicationResources.properties
would correspond to en_US.
I also propose that we add en_GB on l10n so that the community could
maintain a UK version if they want (it would fall back to en_US when
there
are no translations, which is a good thing).
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
2:36 p.m.
Hello,
+1 for en_US
Thanks,
Manuel
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Eduard Moraru <enygma2002(a)gmail.com> wrote:
+1 for en_US
Thanks,
Eduard
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Alex Cotiugă <alexandru.cotiuga(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
+1 for en_US
Thanks,
Alex
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
“en_GB”.
+1 for en_US
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
>
> > Hi devs,
> >
> > By default the xwiki core committers maintain an “en” version of all
> > translations and the other languages are left to the community to
> maintain
> > on l10n.xwiki.org
> >
> > This mail is about deciding if our “en” version is “en_US” or
I propose that we standardize on “en_US”. for example
ApplicationResources.properties
would correspond to en_US.
I also propose that we add en_GB on l10n so that the community could
maintain a UK version if they want (it would fall back to en_US when
there
are no translations, which is a good thing).
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
2:50 p.m.
+1 for en_US
🇺🇸
Thanks,
Caleb
On 04/12/17 14:36, Manuel Smeria wrote:
Hello,
+1 for en_US
Thanks,
Manuel
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Eduard Moraru <enygma2002(a)gmail.com> wrote:
+1 for en_US
Thanks,
Eduard
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Alex Cotiugă <alexandru.cotiuga(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
+1 for en_US
Thanks,
Alex
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
“en_GB”.
+1 for en_US
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> By default the xwiki core committers maintain an “en” version of all
>> translations and the other languages are left to the community to
> maintain
>> on l10n.xwiki.org
>>
>> This mail is about deciding if our “en” version is “en_US” or >
> I propose that we standardize on “en_US”. for example
ApplicationResources.properties
> would correspond to en_US.
>
> I also propose that we add en_GB on l10n so that the community could
> maintain a UK version if they want (it would fall back to en_US when
there
> are no translations, which is a good thing).
>
> WDYT?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>
2:58 p.m.
+1 for en_US
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Caleb James DeLisle <cjd(a)cjdns.fr> wrote:
+1 for en_US
🇺🇸
Thanks,
Caleb
On 04/12/17 14:36, Manuel Smeria wrote:
> Hello,
>
> +1 for en_US
>
> Thanks,
> Manuel
>
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Eduard Moraru <enygma2002(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 for en_US
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Eduard
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Alex Cotiugă <alexandru.cotiuga(a)xwiki.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for en_US
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Alex
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
>>> mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 for en_US
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi devs,
>>>>>
>>>>> By default the xwiki core committers maintain an “en” version of all
>>>>> translations and the other languages are left to the community to
>>>> maintain
>>>>> on l10n.xwiki.org
>>>>>
>>>>> This mail is about deciding if our “en” version is “en_US” or
>> “en_GB”.
>>>>>
>>>>> I propose that we standardize on “en_US”. for example
>>>> ApplicationResources.properties
>>>>> would correspond to en_US.
>>>>>
>>>>> I also propose that we add en_GB on l10n so that the community could
>>>>> maintain a UK version if they want (it would fall back to en_US when
>>>> there
>>>>> are no translations, which is a good thing).
>>>>>
>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
Thomas Mortagne
3:05 p.m.
+1 for en_US
2017-12-04 14:58 GMT+01:00 Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>om>:
+1 for en_US
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Caleb James DeLisle <cjd(a)cjdns.fr> wrote:
--
Guillaume Delhumeau (guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the XWiki.org project
+1 for en_US
🇺🇸
Thanks,
Caleb
On 04/12/17 14:36, Manuel Smeria wrote:
> Hello,
>
> +1 for en_US
>
> Thanks,
> Manuel
>
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Eduard Moraru <enygma2002(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>> +1 for en_US
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Eduard
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Alex Cotiugă <
alexandru.cotiuga(a)xwiki.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for en_US
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Alex
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
>>> mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 for en_US
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi devs,
>>>>>
>>>>> By default the xwiki core committers maintain an “en” version of all
>>>>> translations and the other languages are left to the community to
>>>> maintain
>>>>> on l10n.xwiki.org
>>>>>
>>>>> This mail is about deciding if our “en” version is “en_US” or
>> “en_GB”.
>>>>>
>>>>> I propose that we standardize on “en_US”. for example
>>>> ApplicationResources.properties
>>>>> would correspond to en_US.
>>>>>
>>>>> I also propose that we add en_GB on l10n so that the community could
>>>>> maintain a UK version if they want (it would fall back to en_US when
>>>> there
>>>>> are no translations, which is a good thing).
>>>>>
>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
Thomas Mortagne
7:52 p.m.
Hi,
+1 for en_US
Thanks,
Clément
On 12/04/2017 03:05 PM, Guillaume Delhumeau wrote:
+1 for en_US
2017-12-04 14:58 GMT+01:00 Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>om>:
+1 for en_US
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Caleb James DeLisle <cjd(a)cjdns.fr> wrote:
+1 for en_US
🇺🇸
Thanks,
Caleb
On 04/12/17 14:36, Manuel Smeria wrote:
> Hello,
>
> +1 for en_US
>
> Thanks,
> Manuel
>
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Eduard Moraru <enygma2002(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>> +1 for en_US
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Eduard
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Alex Cotiugă <
alexandru.cotiuga(a)xwiki.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for en_US
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Alex
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
>>> mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 for en_US
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi devs,
>>>>>
>>>>> By default the xwiki core committers maintain an “en” version of all
>>>>> translations and the other languages are left to the community to
>>>> maintain
>>>>> on l10n.xwiki.org
>>>>>
>>>>> This mail is about deciding if our “en” version is “en_US” or
>> “en_GB”.
>>>>>
>>>>> I propose that we standardize on “en_US”. for example
>>>> ApplicationResources.properties
>>>>> would correspond to en_US.
>>>>>
>>>>> I also propose that we add en_GB on l10n so that the community could
>>>>> maintain a UK version if they want (it would fall back to en_US when
>>>> there
>>>>> are no translations, which is a good thing).
>>>>>
>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
Thomas Mortagne
8:29 p.m.
Thanks to all who answered.
I’ve now documented it at:
* http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/DevelopmentPractices#HGeneral
* http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Documentation/UserGuide/Features/I18N
@Thomas: I’ve tried to add a new language by following
http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10N/AddALanguage but I couldn’t find the page
referenced by "Edit the main page of the application.”. Do you think you could add
en_GB to the list? Also, I think we should mention somewhere that the en_US version is
maintained in Git by the XWiki Core dev team and explain how people could contribute to
the en_US version. WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
On 4 Dec 2017, at 13:35, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
By default the xwiki core committers maintain an “en” version of all translations and the
other languages are left to the community to maintain on l10n.xwiki.org
This mail is about deciding if our “en” version is “en_US” or “en_GB”.
I propose that we standardize on “en_US”. for example ApplicationResources.properties
would correspond to en_US.
I also propose that we add en_GB on l10n so that the community could maintain a UK
version if they want (it would fall back to en_US when there are no translations, which is
a good thing).
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
9:49 p.m.
I don't think we should add en_GB and en_US to the list of supported
languages or split the translations. We should use the convention just when
making decisions on the correctness of words. Also I don't think there are
so many differences that it would justify the split.
Thanks,
Caty
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Thanks to all who answered.
I’ve now documented it at:
* http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/
DevelopmentPractices#HGeneral
* http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Documentation/
UserGuide/Features/I18N
@Thomas: I’ve tried to add a new language by following
http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10N/AddALanguage but I couldn’t
find the page referenced by "Edit the main page of the application.”. Do
you think you could add en_GB to the list? Also, I think we should mention
somewhere that the en_US version is maintained in Git by the XWiki Core dev
team and explain how people could contribute to the en_US version. WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
On 4 Dec 2017, at 13:35, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
By default the xwiki core committers maintain an “en” version of all
translations
and the other languages are left to the community to maintain
on l10n.xwiki.org
This mail is about deciding if our “en” version is “en_US” or “en_GB”.
I propose that we standardize on “en_US”. for example
ApplicationResources.properties would correspond to en_US.
I also propose that we add en_GB on l10n so that the community could
maintain a UK
version if they want (it would fall back to en_US when there
are no translations, which is a good thing).
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
5 Dec
5 Dec
9:25 a.m.
Hi Caty,
On 4 Dec 2017, at 21:49, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
<valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I don't think we should add en_GB and en_US to the list of supported
languages or split the translations.
We should definitely not add en_US to l10n since we maintain that one in Git. But note
that en_US is now our officially - by the XWiki core dev team - supported language! :)
(that was the point of this thread).
We should use the convention just when
making decisions on the correctness of words. Also I don't think there are
so many differences that it would justify the split.
I don’t think it’s our call. There’s no reason for us to prevent anyone from being able to
translate xwiki in their language. Second, I think your comment could be viewed as a bit
offensive for some lovers of the british litterature ;) (telling them they should use the
US words because “there aren’t so many differences between both languages”). Third, I dont
really understand your point: It doesn’t cost anything to us (actually it probably costs
us some space on l10n to be precise!).
It’s possible I misunderstood your rationale so please explain more if there’s something I
haven’t understood. Maybe you also missed the fact that anyone from the community would
only need to add translations for the keys that have a different version from the en_US
version one?
I’ll let a few hours for others to comment in case someone else also thinks it’s a bad
idea for some reason.
Thanks
-Vincent
Thanks,
Caty
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
> Thanks to all who answered.
>
> I’ve now documented it at:
> * http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/
> DevelopmentPractices#HGeneral
> * http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Documentation/
> UserGuide/Features/I18N
>
> @Thomas: I’ve tried to add a new language by following
> http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10N/AddALanguage but I couldn’t
> find the page referenced by "Edit the main page of the application.”. Do
> you think you could add en_GB to the list? Also, I think we should mention
> somewhere that the en_US version is maintained in Git by the XWiki Core dev
> team and explain how people could contribute to the en_US version. WDYT?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>> On 4 Dec 2017, at 13:35, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> By default the xwiki core committers maintain an “en” version of all
> translations and the other languages are left to the community to maintain
> on l10n.xwiki.org
>>
>> This mail is about deciding if our “en” version is “en_US” or “en_GB”.
>>
>> I propose that we standardize on “en_US”. for example
> ApplicationResources.properties would correspond to en_US.
>>
>> I also propose that we add en_GB on l10n so that the community could
> maintain a UK version if they want (it would fall back to en_US when there
> are no translations, which is a good thing).
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent
>>
>
>
9 a.m.
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 8:29 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Thanks to all who answered.
I’ve now documented it at:
* http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/DevelopmentPractices#HGeneral
* http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Documentation/UserGuide/Features/I18N
@Thomas: I’ve tried to add a new language by following
http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10N/AddALanguage but I couldn’t find the page
referenced by "Edit the main page of the application.”. Do you think you could add
en_GB to the list?
What l10n calls "application" is what you can see listed in the
"Available Applications" panel (on the left), you just need to edit it
and add your locale.
Also, I think we should mention somewhere that the
en_US version is maintained in Git by the XWiki Core dev team and explain how people could
contribute to the en_US version. WDYT?
Done on the home page.
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Thomas Mortagne
On 4 Dec 2017, at 13:35, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
By default the xwiki core committers maintain an “en” version of all translations and the
other languages are left to the community to maintain on l10n.xwiki.org
This mail is about deciding if our “en” version is “en_US” or “en_GB”.
I propose that we standardize on “en_US”. for example ApplicationResources.properties
would correspond to en_US.
I also propose that we add en_GB on l10n so that the community could maintain a UK
version if they want (it would fall back to en_US when there are no translations, which is
a good thing).
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
9:39 a.m.
On 5 Dec 2017, at 09:00, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 8:29 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
There are 4 apps there. Does it mean I need to add the new language to all 4 apps? Does it
also mean that the list of supported languages in the panel on the right is the sum of all
languages supported by all those apps (ie a flag can there even if only supported by only
1 app)?
Thanks
-Vincent
Thanks to all who answered.
I’ve now documented it at:
* http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/DevelopmentPractices#HGeneral
* http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Documentation/UserGuide/Features/I18N
@Thomas: I’ve tried to add a new language by following
http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10N/AddALanguage but I couldn’t find the page
referenced by "Edit the main page of the application.”. Do you think you could add
en_GB to the list?
What l10n calls "application" is what you can see listed in the
"Available Applications" panel (on the left), you just need to edit it
and add your locale. Also, I think we should mention somewhere that
the en_US version is maintained in Git by the XWiki Core dev team and explain how people
could contribute to the en_US version. WDYT?
Done on the home page.
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Thomas Mortagne On 4 Dec 2017, at 13:35, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
By default the xwiki core committers maintain an “en” version of all translations and the
other languages are left to the community to maintain on l10n.xwiki.org
This mail is about deciding if our “en” version is “en_US” or “en_GB”.
I propose that we standardize on “en_US”. for example ApplicationResources.properties
would correspond to en_US.
I also propose that we add en_GB on l10n so that the community could maintain a UK
version if they want (it would fall back to en_US when there are no translations, which is
a good thing).
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
9:43 a.m.
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Yes.
On 5 Dec 2017, at 09:00, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 8:29 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
There are 4 apps there. Does it mean I need to add the new language to all 4 apps?
Thanks to all who answered.
I’ve now documented it at:
* http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/DevelopmentPractices#HGeneral
* http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Documentation/UserGuide/Features/I18N
@Thomas: I’ve tried to add a new language by following
http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10N/AddALanguage but I couldn’t find the page
referenced by "Edit the main page of the application.”. Do you think you could add
en_GB to the list?
What l10n calls "application" is what you can see listed in the
"Available Applications" panel (on the left), you just need to edit it
and add your locale. Does it also mean that the list of supported languages
in the panel on the right is the sum of all languages supported by all those apps (ie a
flag can there even if only supported by only 1 app)?
The panel on the right depends on the context (if you are on the home
page then it's all the supported languages in all applications).
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Thomas Mortagne
Also, I think we should mention somewhere that
the en_US version is maintained in Git by the XWiki Core dev team and explain how people
could contribute to the en_US version. WDYT?
Done on the home page.
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Thomas Mortagne On 4 Dec 2017, at 13:35, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
By default the xwiki core committers maintain an “en” version of all translations and the
other languages are left to the community to maintain on l10n.xwiki.org
This mail is about deciding if our “en” version is “en_US” or “en_GB”.
I propose that we standardize on “en_US”. for example ApplicationResources.properties
would correspond to en_US.
I also propose that we add en_GB on l10n so that the community could maintain a UK
version if they want (it would fall back to en_US when there are no translations, which is
a good thing).
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
9:49 a.m.
On 5 Dec 2017, at 09:43, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Yes.
ok thanks, didn’t know that ;)
-Vincent
On 5 Dec 2017, at 09:00, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 8:29 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
There are 4 apps there. Does it mean I need to add the new language to all 4 apps? Thanks to all who answered.
I’ve now documented it at:
* http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/DevelopmentPractices#HGeneral
* http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Documentation/UserGuide/Features/I18N
@Thomas: I’ve tried to add a new language by following
http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10N/AddALanguage but I couldn’t find the page
referenced by "Edit the main page of the application.”. Do you think you could add
en_GB to the list?
What l10n calls "application" is what you can see listed in the
"Available Applications" panel (on the left), you just need to edit it
and add your locale. Does it also mean that the list of supported
languages in the panel on the right is the sum of all languages supported by all those
apps (ie a flag can there even if only supported by only 1 app)?
The panel on the right depends on the context (if you are on the home
page then it's all the supported languages in all applications).
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Thomas Mortagne Also, I think we should mention somewhere that
the en_US version is maintained in Git by the XWiki Core dev team and explain how people
could contribute to the en_US version. WDYT?
Done on the home page.
Thanks
-Vincent
> On 4 Dec 2017, at 13:35, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
>
> Hi devs,
>
> By default the xwiki core committers maintain an “en” version of all translations and
the other languages are left to the community to maintain on l10n.xwiki.org
>
> This mail is about deciding if our “en” version is “en_US” or “en_GB”.
>
> I propose that we standardize on “en_US”. for example ApplicationResources.properties
would correspond to en_US.
>
> I also propose that we add en_GB on l10n so that the community could maintain a UK
version if they want (it would fall back to en_US when there are no translations, which is
a good thing).
>
> WDYT?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
--
Thomas Mortagne
2477
days inactive
2478
days old
16 comments
10 participants
participants (10)
-
Alex Cotiugă -
Caleb James DeLisle -
Clément Aubin -
Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) -
Eduard Moraru -
Guillaume Delhumeau -
Manuel Smeria -
Marius Dumitru Florea -
Thomas Mortagne -
Vincent Massol