+1 for 120.

Thanks -Vincent PS: I don't understand the rationale for 128. I don't think it has to be a multiple of 64 :) 120 is 50% more of 80 so it has some rationale... On May 30, 2008, at 6:32 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: > Hi devs, > > Vincent said that he wanted to propose increasing the maximum line > width > for a while, but didn't get to do it yet. And since I want the same > thing, I'm writing the proposal. > > So, the idea is to increase the line width to 128 (or 120? I like 128 > better), since: > - nice code uses descriptive variable/method names, which tend to be > quite long, so many method calls span 2 or more lines > - we're past the stage where developers have small displays that can > only display 80 (or 100) characters at a time > - right now the eclipse settings are at 98 chars, which is quite a > silly > number, and changing to only 100 is not worth the effort, so while > we're > increasing it, we can use a larger value > > Migration plan: > - first, change the xwiki-verification-tools (next Tuesday) > - we don't want to do a massive update, since it will probably create > conflicts with the local changes for each developer, and break > existing > patches > - whenever someone changes a file, he should first do a cleanup and > commit the file without code changes, then a second commit with the > actual behavior fix > - never mix cosmetic changes with actual code affecting the > behavior, as > it will be hard to review that change > - the copyright notice doesn't need to be updated > > > So, everybody agrees? Do we use 120 or 128?