22 Apr
2010
22 Apr
'10
11:33 a.m.
Hi devs,
Since we've been stabilizing the 2.3 branch for a week [1] and that
tests are ok (Caleb is looking at the last failing test) I think now
would be a good time to release XE/XEM 2.3 final instead of RC2, I
suggest to do the release tomorrow. Please shout if you need more time
to commit things before 2.3 final.
Here's my +1.
[1]
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQue…
Thanks,
JV.
22 Apr
22 Apr
11:46 a.m.
On Apr 22, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:
Hi devs,
Since we've been stabilizing the 2.3 branch for a week [1] and that
tests are ok (Caleb is looking at the last failing test) I think now
would be a good time to release XE/XEM 2.3 final instead of RC2, I
suggest to do the release tomorrow. Please shout if you need more time
to commit things before 2.3 final.
Here's my +1.
+1 we shouldn't delay more IMO since we're already a bit late compared to the
roadmap and we also have 3 branches to support ATM which is harder than it could be ;)
If you agree with the vote please make sure that you finish everything you have to do for
2.3 before tonight EOD so that Jean-Vincent could release tomorrow morning.
Anyone knows of a blocker bug that should absolutely be in XE 2.3 and that we have
forgotten ?
Thanks
-Vincent
12:06 p.m.
Vincent Massol wrote:
I like the idea of supporting more than 2 branches. Of course this isn't the
place to discuss that.
+1
Caleb
On Apr 22, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Jean-Vincent Drean
wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> Since we've been stabilizing the 2.3 branch for a week [1] and that
> tests are ok (Caleb is looking at the last failing test)
Changed assert to
waitFor, now working locally.
I think now
would be a good time to release XE/XEM 2.3 final instead of RC2, I
suggest to do the release tomorrow. Please shout if you need more time
to commit things before 2.3 final.
Here's my +1.
+1 we shouldn't delay more IMO since we're already a bit late compared to the
roadmap and we also have 3 branches to support ATM which is harder than it could be ;)
If you agree with the vote please make sure that you finish everything you have to do for
2.3 before tonight EOD so that Jean-Vincent could release tomorrow morning.
Anyone knows of a blocker bug that should absolutely be in XE 2.3 and that we have
forgotten ?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
5:43 p.m.
+0 for the release
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:06, Caleb James DeLisle <calebdelisle(a)lavabit.com
+1 for more branches :)
Denis
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
wrote:
+1 we
shouldn't delay more IMO since we're already a bit late compared to
the
roadmap and we also have 3 branches to support ATM which is harder than
it could be ;)
I like the idea of supporting more than 2 branches. Of course this isn't
the place to discuss that.
5:53 p.m.
On Apr 22, 2010, at 5:43 PM, Denis Gervalle wrote:
+0 for the release
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:06, Caleb James DeLisle <calebdelisle(a)lavabit.com
+1 for more branches :)
You do realize that +1 means you're going to have to do the work of maintaining them
yourself, right (maybe with Caleb since he also wants to do that + anyone who want to do
it) ? :)
Maintaining =
* merge changes to them
* test them
* release them
I'm certainly -1 to force any dev to do that, we already have way too much work and
too little manpower. It's already taxing to support 2 branches.
However we don't have any rule for preventing anyone to maintain branches though so
there's nothing to change IMO. You can already maintain as many as you want.
Which branches would you like to commit to support yourself?
Thanks
-Vincent
wrote:
+1 we
shouldn't delay more IMO since we're already a bit late compared to
the
roadmap and we also have 3 branches to support ATM which is harder than
it could be ;)
I like the idea of supporting more than 2 branches. Of course this isn't
the place to discuss that.
6:49 p.m.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 17:53, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On Apr 22, 2010, at 5:43 PM, Denis Gervalle wrote:
to
You do realize that +1 means you're going to have to do the work of
maintaining them yourself, right (maybe with Caleb since he also wants to do
that + anyone who want to do it) ? :)
Hey, don't go too fast, +1 means "I agree and I'll help as I can", and
not
more ! ;)
Maintaining =
+0 for the release
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:06, Caleb James DeLisle <
calebdelisle(a)lavabit.com
wrote:
>> +1 we shouldn't delay more IMO since we're already a bit late compared
> the roadmap and we also have 3 branches to
support ATM which is harder
than
it could
be ;)
I like the idea of supporting more than 2 branches. Of course this isn't
the place to discuss that.
+1 for more branches :) * merge changes to them
I already do so for some major fixes on version we have in production.
* test them
I even go to production, this is real life test, no ?
* release them
This is the part I am not aware of, and that I really need to learn more...
I'm certainly -1 to force any dev to do that, we
already have way too much
work and too little manpower. It's already taxing to support 2 branches.
However we don't have any rule for preventing
anyone to maintain branches
though so there's nothing to change IMO. You can already maintain as many as
you want.
I will think about that, and Caleb or anyone helps is welcomed
Which branches would you like to commit to support yourself?
2.2 sound great for now, but let me discover the release process first !
I really like the idea of the LTS support of Ubuntu. On a short time, since
5 years is long, but supporting a release for longer than 3 months would be
surely useful and appreciated by users
So, let me think about this... and helps is welcomed !
Denis
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
1:17 p.m.
Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:
Hi devs,
Since we've been stabilizing the 2.3 branch for a week [1] and that
tests are ok (Caleb is looking at the last failing test) I think now
would be a good time to release XE/XEM 2.3 final instead of RC2, I
suggest to do the release tomorrow. Please shout if you need more time
to commit things before 2.3 final.
Here's my +1.
I'm not done with http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-4728 but the
change it pretty big and dangerous for 2.3 final so I'll commit on
trunk, for 2.4M1.
+1 for releasing 2.3 final
Thanks,
Marius
[1]
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQue…
Thanks,
JV.
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
1:26 p.m.
On 04/22/2010 11:33 AM, Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:
Hi devs,
Since we've been stabilizing the 2.3 branch for a week [1] and that
tests are ok (Caleb is looking at the last failing test) I think now
would be a good time to release XE/XEM 2.3 final instead of RC2, I
suggest to do the release tomorrow. Please shout if you need more time
to commit things before 2.3 final.
Here's my +1.
[1]
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQue…
+1
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
2:09 p.m.
Hi all,
I plan to fix http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XAANNOTATIONS-3
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XAANNOTATIONS-10 and
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XAANNOTATIONS-17 by tonight.
Otherwise, 0 for the release.
Happy coding,
Anca
On 04/22/2010 12:33 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:
Hi devs,
Since we've been stabilizing the 2.3 branch for a week [1] and that
tests are ok (Caleb is looking at the last failing test) I think now
would be a good time to release XE/XEM 2.3 final instead of RC2, I
suggest to do the release tomorrow. Please shout if you need more time
to commit things before 2.3 final.
Here's my +1.
[1]
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQue…
Thanks,
JV.
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
23 Apr
23 Apr
6:49 p.m.
Hi devs,
Since we did not have the tests running successfully I haven't been
able to do the release today.
Tests should now be fixed, we should see successful builds this
week-end, if so I'll perform the release on monday morning.
If you plan on committing code before that please be careful not to
commit in the modules included in the release plan:
xwiki-configuration-resources
xwiki-core (2.3 branch)
xwiki-skin-colibri
xwiki-platform-web (2.3 branch)
xwiki-application-administration
xwiki-application-annotations
xwiki-product-enterprise (2.3 branch)
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/ReleasePlans
Thanks,
JV.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Jean-Vincent Drean <jv(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Hi devs,
Since we've been stabilizing the 2.3 branch for a week [1] and that
tests are ok (Caleb is looking at the last failing test) I think now
would be a good time to release XE/XEM 2.3 final instead of RC2, I
suggest to do the release tomorrow. Please shout if you need more time
to commit things before 2.3 final.
Here's my +1.
[1]
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQue…
Thanks,
JV.
5313
days inactive
5314
days old
9 comments
7 participants
participants (7)
-
Anca Luca -
Caleb James DeLisle -
Denis Gervalle -
Jean-Vincent Drean -
Marius Dumitru Florea -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Vincent Massol