Right, I agree with that.
Just reproduced what we've been doing for most modules until now, but
true that description should be a real description.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On 01/25/2011 03:29 PM, jvelociter (SVN) wrote:
Author: jvelociter
Date: 2011-01-25 15:29:51 +0100 (Tue, 25 Jan 2011)
New Revision: 34206
Modified:
platform/core/trunk/xwiki-skin/pom.xml
Log:
Align name and description with other modules
Modified: platform/core/trunk/xwiki-skin/pom.xml
===================================================================
--- platform/core/trunk/xwiki-skin/pom.xml 2011-01-25 12:49:33 UTC (rev 34205)
+++ platform/core/trunk/xwiki-skin/pom.xml 2011-01-25 14:29:51 UTC (rev 34206)
@@ -7,8 +7,8 @@
<version>3.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
</parent>
<artifactId>xwiki-core-skin</artifactId>
-<name>XWiki Core - Skin Component</name>
-<description>XWiki Core - Skin Component</description>
+<name>XWiki Platform - Core - Skin</name>
This is something I really don't like. The description should not be the
same as the name, otherwise there wouldn't be a need to have the same
information in two places. The description should be a real description,
a full sentence that makes sense and really describes what's the module for.
+<description>XWiki Platform - Core -
Skin</description>
<properties>
<xwiki.clirr.skip>true</xwiki.clirr.skip>
</properties>
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs