25 Apr
2006
25 Apr
'06
5:35 p.m.
Hi all,
Is there any particular reason the ID columns for xwikidoc are
generated (hashes of doc name) instead of just a sequence?
Its causing us a little grief when we want to do things like rename a
document - copying the doc seems like a hack, and breaks in subtle ways.
I think things would be much cleaner if we could assume an inviolate
id for each document, and would also have the benefit of making
manual sql maintenance task a lot simpler.
Let me know what you think,
Matt
26 Apr
26 Apr
5:14 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-dev] table ids
On 4/25/06, Matthew Conway <conway(a)tripadvisor.com> wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any particular reason the ID columns for xwikidoc are
generated (hashes of doc name) instead of just a sequence?
Its causing us a little grief when we want to do things like rename a
document - copying the doc seems like a hack, and breaks in subtle ways.
I think things would be much cleaner if we could assume an inviolate
id for each document, and would also have the benefit of making
manual sql maintenance task a lot simpler.
Let me know what you think,
Hi,
I discuss a long time ago about this with Ludovic. We have to change
it to guid, but we never take the time to do it. I think it can be a
good improvement for the next release. The problem is the migration of
the existing database, but we have to do it, it's the source of a lot
of problems.
Feel free to propose a solution.
thanks,
Jérémi
--
Blog: http://www.jeremi.info
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1437724
Project Manager XWiki: http://www.xwiki.org
skype: jeremi23 -- msn et gtalk : jeremi23(a)gmail.com
27 Apr
27 Apr
12:45 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-dev] table ids
We already have some code in a branch which allows to do this.. It need
to be backported to the current code
Ludovic
jeremi joslin a écrit :
On 4/25/06, Matthew Conway
<conway(a)tripadvisor.com> wrote:
--
Ludovic Dubost
XPertNet: http://www.xpertnet.fr/
Blog: http://www.ludovic.org/blog/
XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com
Skype: ldubost AIM: nvludo Yahoo: ludovic
Hi all,
Is there any particular reason the ID columns for xwikidoc are
generated (hashes of doc name) instead of just a sequence?
Its causing us a little grief when we want to do things like rename a
document - copying the doc seems like a hack, and breaks in subtle ways.
I think things would be much cleaner if we could assume an inviolate
id for each document, and would also have the benefit of making
manual sql maintenance task a lot simpler.
Let me know what you think,
Hi,
I discuss a long time ago about this with Ludovic. We have to change
it to guid, but we never take the time to do it. I think it can be a
good improvement for the next release. The problem is the migration of
the existing database, but we have to do it, it's the source of a lot
of problems.
Feel free to propose a solution.
thanks,
Jérémi
--
Blog: http://www.jeremi.info
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1437724
Project Manager XWiki: http://www.xwiki.org
skype: jeremi23 -- msn et gtalk : jeremi23(a)gmail.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
You receive this message as a subscriber of the xwiki-dev(a)objectweb.org mailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto:xwiki-dev-unsubscribe@objectweb.org
For general help: mailto:sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help
ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws
28 Apr
28 Apr
5:49 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-dev] table ids
What branch is this, I'll take a look. Data migration is probably
not needed since the old ids should still work fine, just new ones
will be generated as a guid ... right?
By backporting, do you mean merging in the branch, getting it to
compile and pass all tests (and simple usage) before checking in?
Matt
On Apr 27, 2006, at 6:45 AM, Ludovic Dubost wrote:
We already have some code in a branch which allows to do this.. It
need to be backported to the current code
Ludovic
jeremi joslin a écrit :
On 4/25/06, Matthew Conway
<conway(a)tripadvisor.com> wrote:
--
Ludovic Dubost
XPertNet: http://www.xpertnet.fr/
Blog: http://www.ludovic.org/blog/
XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com
Skype: ldubost AIM: nvludo Yahoo: ludovic
--
You receive this message as a subscriber of the xwiki-
dev(a)objectweb.org mailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto:xwiki-dev-unsubscribe@objectweb.org
For general help: mailto:sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help
ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/
wws Hi all,
Is there any particular reason the ID columns for xwikidoc are
generated (hashes of doc name) instead of just a sequence?
Its causing us a little grief when we want to do things like
rename a
document - copying the doc seems like a hack, and breaks in
subtle ways.
I think things would be much cleaner if we could assume an inviolate
id for each document, and would also have the benefit of making
manual sql maintenance task a lot simpler.
Let me know what you think,
Hi,
I discuss a long time ago about this with Ludovic. We have to change
it to guid, but we never take the time to do it. I think it can be a
good improvement for the next release. The problem is the
migration of
the existing database, but we have to do it, it's the source of a lot
of problems.
Feel free to propose a solution.
thanks,
Jérémi
--
Blog: http://www.jeremi.info
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1437724
Project Manager XWiki: http://www.xwiki.org
skype: jeremi23 -- msn et gtalk : jeremi23(a)gmail.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---
--
You receive this message as a subscriber of the xwiki-
dev(a)objectweb.org mailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto:xwiki-dev-unsubscribe@objectweb.org
For general help: mailto:sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help
ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://
www.objectweb.org/wws
9:20 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-dev] table ids
http://svn.forge.objectweb.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/xwiki/xwiki/branches/XWI…
The branch is very old, so I'm not sure how merging will do.
Concerning data migration, we just need to make sure that there are not
conflicts between GUIDs and old IDs.
Backporting means what you said and make sure we are not creating any
problems to users or document them if they can be.
A little study of ID usage is needed, although IDs are really only a
database thing which is not exposed.
Ludovic
Matthew Conway a écrit :
What branch is this, I'll take a look. Data
migration is probably not
needed since the old ids should still work fine, just new ones will be
generated as a guid ... right?
By backporting, do you mean merging in the branch, getting it to
compile and pass all tests (and simple usage) before checking in?
Matt
On Apr 27, 2006, at 6:45 AM, Ludovic Dubost wrote:
--
Ludovic Dubost
XPertNet: http://www.xpertnet.fr/
Blog: http://www.ludovic.org/blog/
XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com
Skype: ldubost AIM: nvludo Yahoo: ludovic
We already have some code in a branch which allows to do this.. It
need to be backported to the current code
Ludovic
jeremi joslin a écrit :
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
You receive this message as a subscriber of the xwiki-dev(a)objectweb.org mailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto:xwiki-dev-unsubscribe@objectweb.org
For general help: mailto:sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help
ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws
On 4/25/06, Matthew Conway
<conway(a)tripadvisor.com> wrote:
--Ludovic Dubost
XPertNet: http://www.xpertnet.fr/
Blog: http://www.ludovic.org/blog/
XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com
Skype: ldubost AIM: nvludo Yahoo: ludovic
--
You receive this message as a subscriber of the
xwiki-dev(a)objectweb.org mailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto:xwiki-dev-unsubscribe@objectweb.org
For general help: mailto:sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help
ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws Hi all,
Is there any particular reason the ID columns for xwikidoc are
generated (hashes of doc name) instead of just a sequence?
Its causing us a little grief when we want to do things like rename a
document - copying the doc seems like a hack, and breaks in subtle
ways.
I think things would be much cleaner if we could assume an inviolate
id for each document, and would also have the benefit of making
manual sql maintenance task a lot simpler.
Let me know what you think,
Hi,
I discuss a long time ago about this with Ludovic. We have to change
it to guid, but we never take the time to do it. I think it can be a
good improvement for the next release. The problem is the migration of
the existing database, but we have to do it, it's the source of a lot
of problems.
Feel free to propose a solution.
thanks,
Jérémi
--
Blog: http://www.jeremi.info
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1437724
Project Manager XWiki: http://www.xwiki.org
skype: jeremi23 -- msn et gtalk : jeremi23(a)gmail.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
You receive this message as a subscriber of the
xwiki-dev(a)objectweb.org mailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto:xwiki-dev-unsubscribe@objectweb.org
For general help: mailto:sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help
ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws
6707
days inactive
6710
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
jeremi joslin -
Ludovic Dubost -
Matthew Conway