Re: [xwiki-devs] [xwiki-notifications] r9589 - xwiki-platform/xwiki-plugins/trunk/skinx/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/plugin/skinx
30 Apr
2008
30 Apr
'08
9:01 a.m.
How much duplication do you reckon there is between the 2 classes?
Might be worth refactoring and have a common ancestor to share code?
-Vincent
On Apr 30, 2008, at 2:10 AM, sdumitriu (SVN) wrote:
Author: sdumitriu
Date: 2008-04-30 02:10:27 +0200 (Wed, 30 Apr 2008)
New Revision: 9589
Modified:
xwiki-platform/xwiki-plugins/trunk/skinx/src/main/java/com/xpn/
xwiki/plugin/skinx/CssSkinExtensionPlugin.java
xwiki-platform/xwiki-plugins/trunk/skinx/src/main/java/com/xpn/
xwiki/plugin/skinx/JsSkinExtensionPlugin.java
Log:
XSKINX-2: Author not set when auto-creating the extension xclasses
Fixed.
Modified: xwiki-platform/xwiki-plugins/trunk/skinx/src/main/java/com/
xpn/xwiki/plugin/skinx/CssSkinExtensionPlugin.java
===================================================================
--- xwiki-platform/xwiki-plugins/trunk/skinx/src/main/java/com/xpn/
xwiki/plugin/skinx/CssSkinExtensionPlugin.java 2008-04-29 17:20:37
UTC (rev 9588)
+++ xwiki-platform/xwiki-plugins/trunk/skinx/src/main/java/com/xpn/
xwiki/plugin/skinx/CssSkinExtensionPlugin.java 2008-04-30 00:10:27
UTC (rev 9589)
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
package com.xpn.xwiki.plugin.skinx;
+import org.apache.commons.lang.StringUtils;
import org.apache.commons.logging.Log;
import org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory;
@@ -98,9 +99,16 @@
needsUpdate |=
bclass.addStaticListField("cache", "Caching policy",
"long|short|default|forbid");
- String content = doc.getContent();
- if ((content == null) || (content.equals(""))) {
+ if (StringUtils.isBlank(doc.getAuthor())) {
needsUpdate = true;
+ doc.setAuthor("XWiki.Admin");
+ }
+ if (StringUtils.isBlank(doc.getCreator())) {
+ needsUpdate = true;
+ doc.setCreator("XWiki.Admin");
+ }
+ if (StringUtils.isBlank(doc.getContent())) {
+ needsUpdate = true;
doc.setContent("1 XWiki Stylesheet Extension Class");
}
Modified: xwiki-platform/xwiki-plugins/trunk/skinx/src/main/java/com/
xpn/xwiki/plugin/skinx/JsSkinExtensionPlugin.java
===================================================================
--- xwiki-platform/xwiki-plugins/trunk/skinx/src/main/java/com/xpn/
xwiki/plugin/skinx/JsSkinExtensionPlugin.java 2008-04-29 17:20:37
UTC (rev 9588)
+++ xwiki-platform/xwiki-plugins/trunk/skinx/src/main/java/com/xpn/
xwiki/plugin/skinx/JsSkinExtensionPlugin.java 2008-04-30 00:10:27
UTC (rev 9589)
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
package com.xpn.xwiki.plugin.skinx;
+import org.apache.commons.lang.StringUtils;
import org.apache.commons.logging.Log;
import org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory;
@@ -98,9 +99,16 @@
needsUpdate |=
bclass.addStaticListField("cache", "Caching policy",
"long|short|default|forbid");
- String content = doc.getContent();
- if ((content == null) || (content.equals(""))) {
+ if (StringUtils.isBlank(doc.getAuthor())) {
needsUpdate = true;
+ doc.setAuthor("XWiki.Admin");
+ }
+ if (StringUtils.isBlank(doc.getCreator())) {
+ needsUpdate = true;
+ doc.setCreator("XWiki.Admin");
+ }
+ if (StringUtils.isBlank(doc.getContent())) {
+ needsUpdate = true;
doc.setContent("1 XWiki Stylesheet Extension Class");
}
_______________________________________________
notifications mailing list
notifications(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/notifications
1 May
1 May
1:07 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [xwiki-notifications] r9589 - xwiki-platform/xwiki-plugins/trunk/skinx/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/plugin/skinx
Vincent Massol wrote:
How much duplication do you reckon there is between
the 2 classes?
Might be worth refactoring and have a common ancestor to share code?
Hi,
There already is a common ancestor... It just happens that these 2
extensions use a similar xclass, yet different enough not to justify a
common method. At least not one common between these two, but maybe we
can have a common ensureClassDocumentIsProperlyDefined method used by
all the code that creates a class dynamically.
I had a discussion with Jerome about the skin extensions plugin(s), the
main point being: Should there be only one plugin that offers both
Javascript and CSS extensions? I said yes, as SkinExtensions isn't
really a plugin, but a concept, or a meta-plugin, currently implemented
in JavaScript and Style extensions, but that can be further explored.
For example, another idea was to have LinkExtensions, which offer the
ability for a page to "advertise" some links:
- a Project Description application could publish links to DOAP profiles
for every project page
- a Social Networking application could publish FOAF documents for each user
- a slideshow application could publish first/prev/next/last/index links
which would appear nicely in the navigation bar in Opera and in Firefox
with the Site Navigation Bar extension; this is applicable for any
structured multi-document information
- link to a custom RSS feed
- link to a RDF/OWL description of the document
This is pretty different from Jsx and Ssx, because there's no need for
xobjects. Still, the same principle is used: the content pulls in links.
The format of the links is quite different, though, so having one class
that generates 5 types of links (jsx, static js file, ssx, static css
file, user-defined link) is not clean enough.
And maybe sometime later we'll come with another type of skin extension,
with a different way of working. And I think that by now we've learned
that trying to make one class that should do more things is not a good
idea, as otherwise we'll end up with huge classes, so it is not
extensible enough to just add new methods and new if-then-else blocks
whenever we want to add a new type of extensions. I'd say that the
current model is good enough, as it provides a common framework and
allows each extension type to define its own rules, keeping them
separate (each extension type can be enabled or disabled in xwiki.cfg)
Yep, just had another idea of skin extensions for the future, XBL
extensions; but that is for much later, when we'll be able to use XBL files.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
1:13 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-devs] [xwiki-notifications] r9589 - xwiki-platform/xwiki-plugins/trunk/skinx/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/plugin/skinx
Vincent Massol wrote:
How much duplication do you reckon there is between
the 2 classes?
Might be worth refactoring and have a common ancestor to share code?
To be more detailed, the 2 classes share all the code, except getName
(which is wrongly redefined in all the plugins), the method that checks
that the xclass is properly defined (as the xclasses are different), and
the method that generates the links (as they have a different syntax for
the link).
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
6080
days inactive
6080
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Vincent Massol