30 Mar
2013
30 Mar
'13
7:53 p.m.
Hi devs,
Related to the other vote about disabling the xwiki/1.0 syntax [1], I'd
like to retire the old WYSIWYG editor. Although there aren't any obvious
benefits, on the contrary it, removes an important feature, the
advantages for doing this are:
- fewer bugs (there are known bugs that we've decided not to fix since
we agreed not to maintain it anymore)
- less code (the .vm templates that support the editor are really crappy
and I'd be very happy to get rid of them completely)
- strongly encourages (developer) users to migrate to the new syntax
- less non-valid, non-accessible code (standards compliance)
- fewer places where XSS holes can hide (security)
Personally I'd like to remove it completely, but there's also the option
of putting it in a -legacy- module, still enabled in the final releases.
This makes two options:
A) Move the editor in a xwiki-contrib retired module
B) Move the editor in xwiki-platform-legacy-web and leave it enabled
My +1 goes for A.
[1] http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/6damxrncgohtk4oc
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
31 Mar
31 Mar
2:24 p.m.
+1 for A), it's ok to have only wiki editor with the few xwiki/1.0
documents IMO. Plus the old WYSIWYG have lot of issues so it's almost
of a feature to disable it even for xwiki/1.0 syntax anyway.
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.org> wrote:
Hi devs,
Related to the other vote about disabling the xwiki/1.0 syntax [1], I'd
like to retire the old WYSIWYG editor. Although there aren't any obvious
benefits, on the contrary it, removes an important feature, the
advantages for doing this are:
- fewer bugs (there are known bugs that we've decided not to fix since
we agreed not to maintain it anymore)
- less code (the .vm templates that support the editor are really crappy
and I'd be very happy to get rid of them completely)
- strongly encourages (developer) users to migrate to the new syntax
- less non-valid, non-accessible code (standards compliance)
- fewer places where XSS holes can hide (security)
Personally I'd like to remove it completely, but there's also the option
of putting it in a -legacy- module, still enabled in the final releases.
This makes two options:
A) Move the editor in a xwiki-contrib retired module
B) Move the editor in xwiki-platform-legacy-web and leave it enabled
My +1 goes for A.
[1] http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/6damxrncgohtk4oc
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
3:04 p.m.
+1 for A)
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>wrote;wrote:
+1 for A), it's ok to have only wiki editor with
the few xwiki/1.0
documents IMO. Plus the old WYSIWYG have lot of issues so it's almost
of a feature to disable it even for xwiki/1.0 syntax anyway.
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.org> wrote:
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
Hi devs,
Related to the other vote about disabling the xwiki/1.0 syntax [1], I'd
like to retire the old WYSIWYG editor. Although there aren't any obvious
benefits, on the contrary it, removes an important feature, the
advantages for doing this are:
- fewer bugs (there are known bugs that we've decided not to fix since
we agreed not to maintain it anymore)
- less code (the .vm templates that support the editor are really crappy
and I'd be very happy to get rid of them completely)
- strongly encourages (developer) users to migrate to the new syntax
- less non-valid, non-accessible code (standards compliance)
- fewer places where XSS holes can hide (security)
Personally I'd like to remove it completely, but there's also the option
of putting it in a -legacy- module, still enabled in the final releases.
This makes two options:
A) Move the editor in a xwiki-contrib retired module
B) Move the editor in xwiki-platform-legacy-web and leave it enabled
My +1 goes for A.
[1] http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/6damxrncgohtk4oc
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
3:27 p.m.
+1 for A)
Thanks,
Caleb
On 03/31/2013 09:04 AM, Denis Gervalle wrote:
+1 for A)
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>wrote;wrote:
+1 for A), it's ok to have only wiki editor
with the few xwiki/1.0
documents IMO. Plus the old WYSIWYG have lot of issues so it's almost
of a feature to disable it even for xwiki/1.0 syntax anyway.
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.org> wrote:
Hi devs,
Related to the other vote about disabling the xwiki/1.0 syntax [1], I'd
like to retire the old WYSIWYG editor. Although there aren't any obvious
benefits, on the contrary it, removes an important feature, the
advantages for doing this are:
- fewer bugs (there are known bugs that we've decided not to fix since
we agreed not to maintain it anymore)
- less code (the .vm templates that support the editor are really crappy
and I'd be very happy to get rid of them completely)
- strongly encourages (developer) users to migrate to the new syntax
- less non-valid, non-accessible code (standards compliance)
- fewer places where XSS holes can hide (security)
Personally I'd like to remove it completely, but there's also the option
of putting it in a -legacy- module, still enabled in the final releases.
This makes two options:
A) Move the editor in a xwiki-contrib retired module
B) Move the editor in xwiki-platform-legacy-web and leave it enabled
My +1 goes for A.
[1] http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/6damxrncgohtk4oc
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
1 Apr
1 Apr
2:55 p.m.
+1 for A)
Thanks,
Marius
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.org> wrote:
Hi devs,
Related to the other vote about disabling the xwiki/1.0 syntax [1], I'd
like to retire the old WYSIWYG editor. Although there aren't any obvious
benefits, on the contrary it, removes an important feature, the
advantages for doing this are:
- fewer bugs (there are known bugs that we've decided not to fix since
we agreed not to maintain it anymore)
- less code (the .vm templates that support the editor are really crappy
and I'd be very happy to get rid of them completely)
- strongly encourages (developer) users to migrate to the new syntax
- less non-valid, non-accessible code (standards compliance)
- fewer places where XSS holes can hide (security)
Personally I'd like to remove it completely, but there's also the option
of putting it in a -legacy- module, still enabled in the final releases.
This makes two options:
A) Move the editor in a xwiki-contrib retired module
B) Move the editor in xwiki-platform-legacy-web and leave it enabled
My +1 goes for A.
[1] http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/6damxrncgohtk4oc
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
4596
days inactive
4598
days old
4 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Caleb James DeLisle -
Denis Gervalle -
Marius Dumitru Florea -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Thomas Mortagne