On Jun 20, 2008, at 7:01 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently working on the great patch Evelina has made for the new
xwiki administration.
I'd like to take advantage of this to make some modifications to the
default XWiki Preferences.
1) Browse Title Bar Text.
----------------------------------
* Current : XWiki - $doc.space - $doc.name
* Proposal : $doc.displayTitle ($doc.space) - XWiki
+0
2) HTTP Meta Information
-------------------------------------
* Current :
<meta name="description" content="XWiki for sharing information"
/>
<meta name="keywords" content="wiki" />
<meta name="author" content="" />
<meta name="language" content="en" />
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=iso-8859-1" />
* Proposal :
<meta name="description" content="$!doc.displayTitle" />
<meta name="keywords" content="wiki $!doc.tags" />
<meta name="author"
content="$!xwiki.getLocalUserName($doc.getAuthor(), false)" />
<meta name="language" content="$!context.language" />
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=
$xwiki.encoding" />
+1
3) License
----------------
* Current : This wiki is licensed under a <a
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/">Creative
Commons</a> license
* Proposal : This wiki is licensed under a <a
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">Creative
Commons</a> license
+1 but maybe we should say "Creative Commons v3.0" or use this
instead:
http://tinyurl.com/5jwj8p
BTW I've used
http://creativecommons.org/license/ to pick the license
and it says v2.0 in the end... any idea why is that?
4) Version
----------------
What is this version?
If it's meant to override the version.properties file then I'd be +1
to remove this field altogether since I don't think people should
change it easily.
* Current : empty, actually it's not even taken
into account if filled
* Proposal : XWiki $xwiki.getVersion() - <a
onclick="openURL('http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Documen…
,
'_blank'); return false;"
href="http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/
Documentation">Documentation</a>
1) I don't think it's XWiki's version since XWiki doesn't mean much.
It should be the product version.
2) I'm not sure about putting Documentation. I think I'd prefer
putting a link to
http://xwiki.org with the text "XWiki.org".
(An administration menu will replace the current
Documentation link at
the top right corner, shout if you think it's an error).
+1
Thanks
-Vincent
I'm +1 with 1) 2) 3) 4) .. indeed.
That's all (at least for the moment).
Thanks,