I think you should consider the first 1. to be the
title.
I'm not sure I like it. It is based on too weak and undocumented rule,
IMHO.
I tend to think that using the document name as a title
is not so good, even with
spaces allowed in it.
Agree. I hate when people use whole titles for names of files which is
similar to names of wiki documents...
I'm looking into extracting the first 1 in a
document and use it as a
title automatically.
Are you sure an author will always mean the first 1 as a title?
I agree with the option in the TOC tag to choose the
level at which
generation is started.
OK, will add this option.
It could also allow to choose the way numbering are
generated
Should not be big problem but the default/standard number format is
good enough for the initial version so I leave it as a space for
future enhancements.
Jiri.
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 15:05:13 +0200, you wrote:
>
>Hi Jiri,
>
>I think you should consider the first 1. to be the title. I tend to
>think that using the document name as a title is not so good, even with
>spaces allowed in it.
I'm looking into extracting the first 1 in a
document and use it as a
title automatically.
>
>I think some documents might not start with a first level title mainly
>because of presentation, or because they are ment to be included in
>other documents.
>
>I agree with the option in the TOC tag to choose the level at which
>generation is started. It could also allow to choose the way numbering
>are generated:
>
>A: for letters
>I: for roman numbers
>1: for numbers
>a: for small letters
>
>{toc:level=1|format=I.1.a} -> #toc(1 "I.1.a") -> start at level 1
with
>roman numbers, numbers, and letters for level 1, 2 and 3
>{toc:level=2|format=1.a} -> #toc(1 "1.a") -> start at level 2 with
>numbers and letters for level 2 and 3
>
>Ludovic
>
>Jiri Luzny a écrit :
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>as I'm working on the TOC stuff which will allow automatic numbering
>>I would like to discuss an aspect that would influence how the
>>numbering is realized. In particular, I'm interested in knowing what
>>is the typical document structure you guys use and how you apply the
>>headings into document sections. What I have seen on
xwiki.org is a
>>mixture of various patterns like:
>>1 title
>>1.1 chapter1
>>1.1.1 subchapter1
>>1.1 chapter2
>>or
>>1.1 title
>>1.1.1 chapter1
>>1.1.1.1 subchapter1
>>1.1.1 chapter2
>>or
>>1 chapter1
>>1.1 subchapter1
>>1 chapter2
>>or
>>1.1 chapter1
>>1.1.1 subchapter1
>>1.1 chapter2
>>
>>
>>In our team we used to use this pattern:
>>1 title
>>1.1 chapter1
>>1.1.1 subchapter1
>>1.1 chapter2
>>
>>The problem is that generated numbered TOC than would look like:
>>1 title
>>1.1 chapter1
>>1.1.1 subchapter1
>>1.2 chapter2
>>
>>which is not consistent with our company's standard Word documentation
>>structure (a common document structure, IMHO) which has this natural
>>TOC:
>>title
>>1. chapter1
>> 1.1 subchapter1
>>2. chapter2
>>...
>>
>>
>>My question is whether you think it would be good idea to treat a
>>document title as a specific part of document and introduce a new tag
>>like {title} or 0 ... and have its own CSS item. In Confluence the
>>document title is equal to physical wiki document name and rendered
>>separately on top of the page.
>>Another possibility which would solve the generation of TOC issue is
>>to add an option to the TOC tag what initial heading level it should
>>start the generation at.
>>I would personally prefer to treat document title specifically as I
>>consider the mentioned TOC option as a kind of hack, IMHO.
>>
>>Jiri.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>--
>>You receive this message as a subscriber of the xwiki-dev(a)objectweb.org mailing
list.
>>To unsubscribe: mailto:xwiki-dev-unsubscribe@objectweb.org
>>For general help: mailto:sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help
>>ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page:
http://www.objectweb.org/wws
>>
>>