31 Aug
2010
31 Aug
'10
11:31 a.m.
Hi,
I posted http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XE-700 a couple of days ago
and am writing now because more and more of the Balsamiq Mockups for
XWiki users are attempting or would like to migrate to 2.4 but have
pages with mockups embedded using #includeMacros. I'd like to know if
#includeMacros is definitely not going to be supported from 2.4
onwards or if this is a bug that will be fixed at some point. We can
update the plugin (already have actually) to use the recommended
syntax for new mockups but still have the issue of dealing with
existing pages. I would also like your thoughts on a simple workaround
which ideally we could ask our users / wiki admins to do.
Thanks,
Luis
1 Sep
1 Sep
6:10 p.m.
Hi Luis,
I see you haven't got any answer on this yet. I'll try to talk to Thomas Mortagne
about it tomorrow. I know Jerome talked to Thomas already and apparently it seems it's
not easy to continue to support it (I don't know the bottom the problem yet).
We'll talk to see how we can make it as easy as possible for you and come back with a
solution.
Thanks
-Vincent
On Aug 31, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Luis Arias wrote:
Hi,
I posted http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XE-700 a couple of days ago
and am writing now because more and more of the Balsamiq Mockups for
XWiki users are attempting or would like to migrate to 2.4 but have
pages with mockups embedded using #includeMacros. I'd like to know if
#includeMacros is definitely not going to be supported from 2.4
onwards or if this is a bug that will be fixed at some point. We can
update the plugin (already have actually) to use the recommended
syntax for new mockups but still have the issue of dealing with
existing pages. I would also like your thoughts on a simple workaround
which ideally we could ask our users / wiki admins to do.
Thanks,
Luis
3 Sep
3 Sep
11:07 a.m.
I just fixed http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-5453 but as i
said on the comment i don't see why you have an issue because it's
only when including a xwiki/2.0 document using #include* velocity
macros which is useless unless you want to include 2.0 syntax document
into 1.0 syntax document.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 18:10, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi Luis,
I see you haven't got any answer on this yet. I'll try to talk to Thomas Mortagne
about it tomorrow. I know Jerome talked to Thomas already and apparently it seems it's
not easy to continue to support it (I don't know the bottom the problem yet).
We'll talk to see how we can make it as easy as possible for you and come back with a
solution.
Thanks
-Vincent
On Aug 31, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Luis Arias wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
Hi,
I posted http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XE-700 a couple of days ago
and am writing now because more and more of the Balsamiq Mockups for
XWiki users are attempting or would like to migrate to 2.4 but have
pages with mockups embedded using #includeMacros. I'd like to know if
#includeMacros is definitely not going to be supported from 2.4
onwards or if this is a bug that will be fixed at some point. We can
update the plugin (already have actually) to use the recommended
syntax for new mockups but still have the issue of dealing with
existing pages. I would also like your thoughts on a simple workaround
which ideally we could ask our users / wiki admins to do.
Thanks,
Luis
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
11:25 a.m.
Ok i understood i think, you converted to xwiki/2.0 some page that is
still used by xwiki/1.0 documents ?
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:07, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
I just fixed
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-5453 but as i
said on the comment i don't see why you have an issue because it's
only when including a xwiki/2.0 document using #include* velocity
macros which is useless unless you want to include 2.0 syntax document
into 1.0 syntax document.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 18:10, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
Hi Luis,
I see you haven't got any answer on this yet. I'll try to talk to Thomas Mortagne
about it tomorrow. I know Jerome talked to Thomas already and apparently it seems it's
not easy to continue to support it (I don't know the bottom the problem yet).
We'll talk to see how we can make it as easy as possible for you and come back with a
solution.
Thanks
-Vincent
On Aug 31, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Luis Arias wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
Hi,
I posted http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XE-700 a couple of days ago
and am writing now because more and more of the Balsamiq Mockups for
XWiki users are attempting or would like to migrate to 2.4 but have
pages with mockups embedded using #includeMacros. I'd like to know if
#includeMacros is definitely not going to be supported from 2.4
onwards or if this is a bug that will be fixed at some point. We can
update the plugin (already have actually) to use the recommended
syntax for new mockups but still have the issue of dealing with
existing pages. I would also like your thoughts on a simple workaround
which ideally we could ask our users / wiki admins to do.
Thanks,
Luis
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
4 Sep
4 Sep
3:59 p.m.
Ah great, I'll download a build and test in our environment. It seems
that the Mockups.MacrosV2 page is shown as an XWiki 2.0 Syntax page in
the WIKI editor but is using 1.0 Syntax. Could this be part of the
issue ? We want to have the largest backwards compatibility. Right
now this means we compile against the xwiki 1.5 jars. I'm not sure if
XWiki 2.0 syntax was actually around back then, from memory it was
announced with 1.7 right ? In that case it is in my eyes definitely a
mistake on our part to carry pages marked as 2.0 syntax in our XAR. I
will also try setting the syntax of any such pages to 1.0 and
retesting. If you wish to test as we do, you can follow the
instructions to download and install Mockups for XWiki here and then
try to add a mockup to a page:
http://www.balsamiq.com/products/mockups/xwiki#download
Thanks for your help on this !
Luis
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Ok i understood i think, you converted to xwiki/2.0
some page that is
still used by xwiki/1.0 documents ?
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:07, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> I just fixed http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-5453 but as i
> said on the comment i don't see why you have an issue because it's
> only when including a xwiki/2.0 document using #include* velocity
> macros which is useless unless you want to include 2.0 syntax document
> into 1.0 syntax document.
>
5 Sep
5 Sep
1:17 p.m.
On 09/04/2010 03:59 PM, Luis Arias wrote:
Ah great, I'll download a build and test in our
environment. It seems
that the Mockups.MacrosV2 page is shown as an XWiki 2.0 Syntax page in
the WIKI editor but is using 1.0 Syntax. Could this be part of the
issue ? We want to have the largest backwards compatibility. Right
now this means we compile against the xwiki 1.5 jars. I'm not sure if
XWiki 2.0 syntax was actually around back then, from memory it was
announced with 1.7 right ? In that case it is in my eyes definitely a
mistake on our part to carry pages marked as 2.0 syntax in our XAR. I
will also try setting the syntax of any such pages to 1.0 and
retesting. If you wish to test as we do, you can follow the
instructions to download and install Mockups for XWiki here and then
try to add a mockup to a page:
http://www.balsamiq.com/products/mockups/xwiki#download
Thanks for your help on this !
What baffles me is that annotations work correctly on myxwiki.org (2.4):
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/Mockups/MeetingManager
Luis
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> Ok i understood i think, you converted to xwiki/2.0 some page that is
> still used by xwiki/1.0 documents ?
>
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:07, Thomas Mortagne<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
>> I just fixed http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-5453 but as i
>> said on the comment i don't see why you have an issue because it's
>> only when including a xwiki/2.0 document using #include* velocity
>> macros which is useless unless you want to include 2.0 syntax document
>> into 1.0 syntax document.
>>
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
1:29 p.m.
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 13:17, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
On 09/04/2010 03:59 PM, Luis Arias wrote:
Annotations are including 2.0 document using #includeMacros() ?
Ah great, I'll download a build and test in
our environment. It seems
that the Mockups.MacrosV2 page is shown as an XWiki 2.0 Syntax page in
the WIKI editor but is using 1.0 Syntax. Could this be part of the
issue ? We want to have the largest backwards compatibility. Right
now this means we compile against the xwiki 1.5 jars. I'm not sure if
XWiki 2.0 syntax was actually around back then, from memory it was
announced with 1.7 right ? In that case it is in my eyes definitely a
mistake on our part to carry pages marked as 2.0 syntax in our XAR. I
will also try setting the syntax of any such pages to 1.0 and
retesting. If you wish to test as we do, you can follow the
instructions to download and install Mockups for XWiki here and then
try to add a mockup to a page:
http://www.balsamiq.com/products/mockups/xwiki#download
Thanks for your help on this !
What baffles me is that annotations work correctly on myxwiki.org (2.4):
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/Mockups/MeetingManager Luis
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> Ok i understood i think, you converted to xwiki/2.0 some page that is
> still used by xwiki/1.0 documents ?
>
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:07, Thomas Mortagne<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
>> I just fixed http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-5453 but as i
>> said on the comment i don't see why you have an issue because it's
>> only when including a xwiki/2.0 document using #include* velocity
>> macros which is useless unless you want to include 2.0 syntax document
>> into 1.0 syntax document.
>>
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
1:31 p.m.
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 13:29, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
--
Thomas Mortagne
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 13:17, Sergiu Dumitriu
<sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Mockups.Macros is a xwiki/1.0 document and as I said the issue is only
when including 2.0 document.
On 09/04/2010 03:59 PM, Luis Arias wrote:
Annotations are including 2.0 document using #includeMacros() ? Ah great, I'll download a build and test in
our environment. It seems
that the Mockups.MacrosV2 page is shown as an XWiki 2.0 Syntax page in
the WIKI editor but is using 1.0 Syntax. Could this be part of the
issue ? We want to have the largest backwards compatibility. Right
now this means we compile against the xwiki 1.5 jars. I'm not sure if
XWiki 2.0 syntax was actually around back then, from memory it was
announced with 1.7 right ? In that case it is in my eyes definitely a
mistake on our part to carry pages marked as 2.0 syntax in our XAR. I
will also try setting the syntax of any such pages to 1.0 and
retesting. If you wish to test as we do, you can follow the
instructions to download and install Mockups for XWiki here and then
try to add a mockup to a page:
http://www.balsamiq.com/products/mockups/xwiki#download
Thanks for your help on this !
What baffles me is that annotations work correctly on myxwiki.org (2.4):
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/Mockups/MeetingManager Luis
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> Ok i understood i think, you converted to xwiki/2.0 some page that is
> still used by xwiki/1.0 documents ?
>
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:07, Thomas Mortagne<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
>> I just fixed http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-5453 but as i
>> said on the comment i don't see why you have an issue because it's
>> only when including a xwiki/2.0 document using #include* velocity
>> macros which is useless unless you want to include 2.0 syntax document
>> into 1.0 syntax document.
>>
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
2:17 p.m.
On 09/05/2010 01:17 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On 09/04/2010 03:59 PM, Luis Arias wrote:
Obviously, I meant mockups.
Ah great, I'll download a build and test in
our environment. It seems
that the Mockups.MacrosV2 page is shown as an XWiki 2.0 Syntax page in
the WIKI editor but is using 1.0 Syntax. Could this be part of the
issue ? We want to have the largest backwards compatibility. Right
now this means we compile against the xwiki 1.5 jars. I'm not sure if
XWiki 2.0 syntax was actually around back then, from memory it was
announced with 1.7 right ? In that case it is in my eyes definitely a
mistake on our part to carry pages marked as 2.0 syntax in our XAR. I
will also try setting the syntax of any such pages to 1.0 and
retesting. If you wish to test as we do, you can follow the
instructions to download and install Mockups for XWiki here and then
try to add a mockup to a page:
http://www.balsamiq.com/products/mockups/xwiki#download
Thanks for your help on this !
What baffles me is that annotations work correctly on myxwiki.org (2.4):
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/Mockups/MeetingManager
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
Luis
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> Ok i understood i think, you converted to xwiki/2.0 some page that is
> still used by xwiki/1.0 documents ?
>
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:07, Thomas
> Mortagne<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>> I just fixed http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-5453 but as i
>> said on the comment i don't see why you have an issue because it's
>> only when including a xwiki/2.0 document using #include* velocity
>> macros which is useless unless you want to include 2.0 syntax document
>> into 1.0 syntax document.
>>
6 Sep
6 Sep
1:18 p.m.
Hi,
I found a workaround this morning in my tests which is to remove the
{{velocity}{{html}} wrapping the velocity code and saving
Mockups.MacrosV2 with the XWIki 1.0 Syntax flag. This basically means
Mockups.Macros and Mockups.MacrosV2 have the same content and page
syntax flag. It's curious, but I remember directly including
Mockups.Macros wasn't working in 2.0 Syntax pages at some point, so we
had to create Mockups.MacrosV2. But apparently we don't really need it
now. Do you have any idea at what point the behavior changed ?
Thanks,
Luis
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Luis Arias <kaaloo(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Ah great, I'll download a build and test in our
environment. It seems
that the Mockups.MacrosV2 page is shown as an XWiki 2.0 Syntax page in
the WIKI editor but is using 1.0 Syntax. Could this be part of the
issue ? We want to have the largest backwards compatibility. Right
now this means we compile against the xwiki 1.5 jars. I'm not sure if
XWiki 2.0 syntax was actually around back then, from memory it was
announced with 1.7 right ? In that case it is in my eyes definitely a
mistake on our part to carry pages marked as 2.0 syntax in our XAR. I
will also try setting the syntax of any such pages to 1.0 and
retesting. If you wish to test as we do, you can follow the
instructions to download and install Mockups for XWiki here and then
try to add a mockup to a page:
http://www.balsamiq.com/products/mockups/xwiki#download
Thanks for your help on this !
Luis
5124
days inactive
5130
days old
9 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Luis Arias -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Thomas Mortagne -
Vincent Massol