28 May
2008
28 May
'08
4:10 p.m.
Hi all,
Maybe this can be interesting...
http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxlibs/
Cheers,
Fabio
28 May
28 May
4:26 p.m.
On May 28, 2008, at 4:10 PM, Fabio Mancinelli wrote:
Hi all,
Maybe this can be interesting...
http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxlibs/
Interesting. So basically google would act like a remote maven
repository for ajax libraries, to be used at runtime.
* I like the fact that we don't have to host the source code in our
source tree.
* I like the fact that this allows controlling cleanly the versions of
the library we use
* I like a bit less the dependency on google.
Actually I'd prefer that we put the JS libraries we use in a remote
maven repo and bind them at build time.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
30 May
30 May
4:36 p.m.
don't like the dependency on google...
be careful when XWIKI works in a closed network without connection to
internet...
but seems fine for quick access to JS libs :)
regards
Pascal
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On May 28, 2008, at 4:10 PM, Fabio Mancinelli wrote:
Hi all,
Maybe this can be interesting...
http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxlibs/
Interesting. So basically google would act like a remote maven
repository for ajax libraries, to be used at runtime.
* I like the fact that we don't have to host the source code in our
source tree.
* I like the fact that this allows controlling cleanly the versions of
the library we use
* I like a bit less the dependency on google.
Actually I'd prefer that we put the JS libraries we use in a remote
maven repo and bind them at build time.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
6:46 p.m.
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Pascal Voitot
<pascal.voitot.dev(a)gmail.com> wrote:
be careful when XWIKI works in a closed network
without connection to
internet...
+1, I haven't seen anything about this on the google ajax api website
but I think a fallback on libs bundled with the application would be
possible in that case though.
--
Jean-Vincent Drean
1 Jun
1 Jun
10:35 a.m.
Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Pascal Voitot
<pascal.voitot.dev(a)gmail.com> wrote:
+1 I don't see the point of creating yet another dependency.
I think we need to fix the way we server our libs to make sure we cache
properly
Ludovic
--
Ludovic Dubost
Blog: http://blog.ludovic.org/
XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com
Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost
be careful when XWIKI works in a closed network
without connection to
internet...
+1, I haven't seen anything about this on the google ajax api website
but I think a fallback on libs bundled with the application would be
possible in that case though.
6004
days inactive
6008
days old
4 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Fabio Mancinelli -
Jean-Vincent Drean -
Ludovic Dubost -
Pascal Voitot -
Vincent Massol