Hi devs,
We've had a quick discussion with Thomas on IRC regarding the strategy we want to adopt for issues we don't plan to fix. Here's my POV:
* We should close issues that we know we won't fix. We might not want to fix them for several reasons but one of these reason is that the issue is for an old XE version. Especially since we said that we're only supporting the last 2 versions. We = xwiki committers, but if any committer wants to fix an old issue he's free to do it of course, it's just a general rule.
* An option would be to leave them open and wait for a patch but I don't think it's a good idea, because:
- it sends the wrong signals that we're going to fix the issue
- the issue can still be found with a search even if closed
- when we close it then the reporter can explain why it's so important for him, or not. Which we wouldn't know if we hadn't closed it
- contributors could reopen them and attach a patch or just create a new issue
- it means that for all other issues we plan to fix them at some point
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
Hello devs,
I'm trying a few optimizations of the Lucene plugin and try to keep
this flexible and not too intergeo or curriki specialized.
The fact is that this plugin uses Lucene in a very blind and heavy
fashion, which gives a lot of power (but which is not used). Mostly,
I'd like, in a configurable way:
- to decide to store and/or index or not some objects or object
properties
- to decide to exclude some documents
- to decide to use particular analyzers for particular fields (in
particular the "token fields")
I know it would be almost possible by replacing lucene by solr and
letting users tune solr.
But maybe it is simple to have the configurability done in xwiki.
Probably the nicest way I see this would be the way the notifications
are done: a central field indicates the page of a groovy source which
should implement such an interface as "LuceneIndexProfile" which would
add such questions (maybe even including some more such as the Data
classes).
Is the nicest above easy?
Do we prefer and xml configuration?
paul
Hi devs,
I'd like to split the wysiwyg module in two:
xwiki-gwt-editor : All the client side except the editor initialization
code. This module should depend only on xwiki-gwt-dom and
xwiki-gwt-user. As a consequence, anyone should be able to inherit this
module and reuse the editor outside XWiki. All the editor plugins are
included but we don't enforce their use. This means that external
parties can assemble whichever plugins they want and only those plugins
will be compiled into JavaScript. Some plugins use services. External
parties have to implement this services if they want to use the plugin.
xwiki-gwt-editor-xwiki : XWiki-specific client initialization code plus
all the server side (i.e. the XWiki implementation of plugin services).
This module will depend on xwiki-gwt-editor and XWiki platform.
All this is quite easy to do, except one thing. Plugin services are
treated as components by XWiki which means service interfaces have to be
annotated as component roles. This adds a dependency on
xwiki-component-api to xwiki-gwt-editor. I see two options:
(1) Keep the annotations and thus the dependency. This requires no
effort but will make the editor less reusable for those who want to
implement the services in a different way, using a different component
manager for instance.
(2) Remove the component role annotations and add some code to
xwiki-gwt-editor-xwiki that dynamically registers as component roles at
XWiki startup all the interfaces extending RemoteService (all GWT
services must extend this interface). I'm not sure this is possible
because components defined in components.txt are looked up earlier.
Vincent, WDYT?
We can improve later the organization and maybe split xwiki-gwt-editor
in multiple modules, but for now this is the quickest way to make the
editor reusable. I'm ready to do the split as soon as we agree on the
details. WDYT?
Thanks,
Marius
Hello, XWiki team!
i saw this topic:
http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/FAQ/Whenuploadtheaccessoriesatthexwiki13
versionallChinesewillbedeletedinfilename
and i have the same problem, but with russian characters.
When i'm adding the file with name, like "russian_word123.txt" - it is adds
like "123.txt". All russian symbols are truncated. With english and numbers
- all fine.
Please help asap...
All encoding are sets t oUTF-8 and hole Xwiki don't have problem with
russian characters, except attachment thing.
I'm really need russian characters in file names, how I can get this, or
disable the truncation function???
BTW - my environment are:
XWiki Enterprise 2.1.25683
Oracle 10gR2
Thanks!
Hi,
Why not have panels on the right too (for the home page at least) and have 3 panels on the right:
- Create an Account
- Add a language
- Supported Languages
This would free up space for the main view so that more of the latest translations can be seen without scrolling.
I also think it would make the page more balanced.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
Hi All
I am trying to install the war file and get it working with Oracle
I have followed the instructions resolved a number of issues
I still have a problem at present and it appears that the war file for
configuring with its own database and container does not contain any of
teh hbm.xml files I have tried the stable and latest and scanning them I
cannot locate them in teh war file
Could someone confirm this for me and what is the best approach in the
sort term should I just download from the svm repository?
Thanks
Cheers
Peter