xwiki-devs February 2011

xwiki-devs@xwiki.org

30 participants
95 discussions

[xwiki-devs] [UX][Consistency][Vote] "Page" vs. "Document" consistent naming

by Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)

Hi, We are using mixed naming when referring to a document/page, not only on different pages, but also in the same context (Rename step for example). There is also an issue referring to this problem XWIKI-5401<http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-5401>and we need to find an answer in order to move forward consistency. So the question is which version we prefer: "Page" or "Document" ? I'm voting +1 for "Page". "Page" is more used IMO, especially in the "Space"/"Page" context. "Page" is more general than "Document" and better fitted for a platform that encapsulates all kind of content (not just documents). Please cast your vote. Thanks, Caty

8 years, 10 months

[xwiki-devs] Questions about fixing getRenderedContent() bug

by Vincent Massol

Hi, Im trying to fix http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-4274 Basically if you do $xwiki.getDocument("someDoc").getRenderedContent() it'll get executed in the context of the current doc which I believe is wrong especially since other signatures of getRenderedContent() execute in the target document's context. I have fixed this locally but found that admin.vm for example is assuming that getRenderedContent() will get executed in the context of the calling doc (i.e. XWiki.Import when doing an import for example). FYI the chain flow is admin.vm -- getRenderedContent() --> XWiki.AdminSheet --> XWiki.AdminImportSheet --> importinline.vm, which requires the current doc to be XWiki.Import (to get/put attachments from/to it). I can fix this easily using a new getRenderedContent signature I've introduced. However I'm wondering if we have other places that incorrectly use getRenderedContent() and assume it won't be rendered in the context of the target document. Is this change too dangerous to make? If not know, we'll need to it quickly (2.1M1?) since it's an important bug IMO. WDYT? Thanks -Vincent

9 years, 5 months

[xwiki-devs] Redirect to a space

by Bruno Amaro Almeida

Hi How can i redirect the users after login to a space ? I`m looking at login.vm but i have no clue to do this Thanks

11 years, 1 month

[xwiki-devs] Pretty Time library

by Vincent Massol

Could be useful: http://ocpsoft.com/prettytime/ Idea of usage: For ex we could use that to show the last modified document dates for dates in the past week (for ex): "Document created 2 days ago" It's in the maven central repo and it's under LGPL -Vincent

12 years

[xwiki-devs] How to load GWT application on Xwiki pages?

by Leon Wang

Hi Everyone! I have read this document "Writing GWT applications in XWiki" ( http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Drafts/WritingGWTApplicationsInXWiki) And I know how to develop GWT module for xwiki now. I also have read the document "WYSIWYG Editor Module" ( http://code.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Modules/WysiwygEditorModule). I followed the instruction which tried to integrate the WYSIWYG editor(GWT application) in wiki pages, and I put the following code in my wiki editor: "{{html}} <script type="text/javascript" src="XWikiWysiwyg.js"> alert('WYSIWYG code is loaded!'); </script> <textarea id="demo"></textarea> <script type="text/javascript"> Wysiwyg.onModuleLoad(function() { new WysiwygEditor({hookId:'demo'}); alert('WYSIWYG code is loaded!'); }); Wysiwyg.onModuleLoad(function() { editor = new WysiwygEditor({hookId: 'demo'}); }); }); </script> {{/html}}" After saved, it only display a blank text area without any sign of WYSIWYG editor, also there is no alart 'WYSIWYG code is loaded!' popup. Can you help me figure it out what is wrong with it? I am planing to develop a tree view using GWT to display Design Rationale Element. Could you give me some ideas of after my development, how can I embeded the GWT application into Xwiki pages and interact with the GWT application? Thank you very much! Leon

12 years, 8 months

[xwiki-devs] XWiki logo around

by coldserenity

Hi, I remember once there was a contest for new XWiki logo but due to elections fail (there would have been too many unsatisfied people if any of newly suggested logos had been approved) the process has gracefully ended (which, in my opinion, was a good decision) I also think that it would be worthless to conduct another competition/election amongst users because as the saying goes - tastes differ. The only thing users can contribute are their ideas (which might be accepted or might not which is fair) regarding shapes and symbols to use. Decision about visual design should be made within very very small circle of visual designers probably with one or two people involved in the project to chill down designers' burning imagination :) Having all of the above said, I would suggest to collect a set of shapes and symbols for new XWiki logo each supplied with description of underlying meaning. And then (having revised all of the comments in some of the former posts regarding what new logo should be: symmetric/asymmetric, complex/simple, round/firm) provide all that to a designer to draw several sketches. And then by internal vote (at maximum the development team members involved) choose the new logo. This thread is for storing all of the ideas on the new XWiki logo. At least that's what I (as a user) will be using it for may any ideas to come. Join :) Regards, Roman -- View this message in context: http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/XWiki-logo-around-tp6074956p6074956.html Sent from the XWiki- Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

12 years, 8 months

[xwiki-devs] Ready to move the Albatross skin to contrib/retired?

by Vincent Massol

Hi (especially Sergiu), I think you worked on removing the dependency on Albatross, right? Is it finished? Can can we move the Albatross skin to contrib/retried? See http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/jx5vyqtrwwaidfka Thanks -Vincent

12 years, 10 months

[xwiki-devs] [Follow-up] New administration section for the WYSIWYG editor

by Marius Dumitru Florea

Hi devs, Following http://lists.xwiki.org/pipermail/devs/2010-November/021012.html I made some improvements and now I have this http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/WysiwygEditorConfig . I'd like to include it in XE 3.0. WDYT? Thanks, Marius

13 years, 1 month

[xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Mailing list for infrastructure?

by Vincent Massol

Hi, In order to get more community help and to open up our xwiki.org infrastructure to the community we could introduce an infra(a)xwiki.org mailing list which would be the place to: - talk about infrastructure. By infra I mean machines and their configuration + xwiki.org + myxwiki.org - receive emails from xwiki.org and myxwiki.org when XE/XEM restarts (there's a script to restart them automatically when an instance doesn't respond within 30 seconds for ex). These emails contains thread dump + other information useful to debug and understand why the instance wasn't responding. WDYT? Thanks -Vincent

13 years, 2 months

[xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Introduce user management configuration in virtual mode

by Jean-Vincent Drean

Hi Devs, I'd like to introduce a new configuration property that would define at which level users should be handled in a farm. See the proposition about the new entry in xwiki.properties, it should be self-explanatory: --------------------------------8<-------------------------------- #-# [Since 2.5M1] #-# Define at which level users and groups should be handled in the farm. Available modes: #-# #-# mixed (default): #-# - user registration available in the main wiki and local wikis #-# - users from the current wiki and the main wiki will be displayed in the rights interface and user suggests #-# - user administration is present in all the wikis #-# #-# local: #-# - user registration available in the main wiki and local wikis #-# - only users from the current wiki will be displayed in the rights interface and user suggests #-# - user administration is present in all the wikis #-# #-# global: #-# - user registration available in the main wiki only, the register link in local wikis will point to the main wiki #-# - only users from the main wiki will be displayed in the rights interface and user suggests #-# - user administration is present in the main wiki only core.virtual.users=mixed -------------------------------->8-------------------------------- More details are available here: http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/UsersModule WDYT ? Thanks, JV.

13 years, 2 months

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

xwiki-devs February 2011