On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 12:13 PM, vincent(a)massol.net <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
On 1 Oct 2014 at 12:08:23, Denis Gervalle (dgl(a)softec.lu(mailto:
dgl(a)softec.lu)) wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Guillaume
"Louis-Marie" Delhumeau <
gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Yes that one looks very cool to me but... :)
I wonder if the name would not be better to be "Create”.
Yes I completely agree about that.
Since, I think we still need an another button in
the page called "Add"
to
add to the page:
* annotations using modal (you may select, than use the button normally)
* comment using a modal (without having to scroll to the bottom)
* attachement using a modal (without having to scroll to the bottom),
* objects using a modal (without necessarily needing to load all existing
objects for edit, so a page could show objects without having to manage
addition of new ones, AWSeconds)
This way, the extradoc tabs could be hidden, independently of the
comment/attachment functionality, and the pain of scrolling to the bottom
is removed. It give also some logic to those button, with a
non-contextual
create button, and a contextual add button. We
could then allow
application
to hook both of them depending on their needs.
Why not, but I’d like to separate the 2 issues so that we can move on
quickly ;)
I am not against ! Just need to name the first "Create" to be able to think
about the second.
Thanks
-Vincent
Another, a bit off-topic, remarks, is that in the
More actions,
annotation
should be isolated, and work like a toggle to
display/hide them
(including
the author filter box and the tooltips), without
needing to click a
seperate checkbox.
WDYT ?
>
> 2014-10-01 10:59 GMT+02:00 Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau <
> gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com>gt;:
>
> > So basically, you want:
> >
http://tof.canardpc.com/view/25ad0704-563e-41cd-bbf2-72c371912245.jpg
> >
> > 2014-10-01 10:46 GMT+02:00 vincent(a)massol.net :
> >
> >
> >>
> >> On 1 Oct 2014 at 10:09:00, Guillaume Lerouge (guillaume(a)xwiki.com
> (mailto:
> >> guillaume(a)xwiki.com)) wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > after discussing with Vincent this morning we came to a suggestion
> that
> >> > would fix my issue with the current location of the add button.
The
> idea
> >> > would be to move the search bar to the left of the menu, and put
the
> >> "Add"
> >> > button in its place.
> >> >
> >> > Crude image explanation here:
> >> >
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hrxlj6n6pztigic/AddButton-Search.png
> >> >
> >> > This way the "Add" button is back in a global menu, not in a
menu
that
> >> is
> >> > contextual to the page, yet it stays very visible. In addition to
> this,
> >> > since "Create wiki" is visible only to authorized users,
it's not
too
> >> much
> >> > in the way. Last item: this solves the issue of having the
"Edit"
and
> >> "More
> >> > actions" buttons separated from one another.
> >> >
> >> > WDYT?
> >>
> >> Sounds the best to me! :) I never really liked the move of the
Create
> >> button in the page contextual menu
(doesn’t make sense to me).
> >>
> >> FYI here’s what they have for:
> >> - confluence:
> >>
>
https://www.evernote.com/shard/s119/sh/948c4f24-2485-4b33-8452-1e6e1a2d6c74…
> >> - jira:
> >>
>
https://www.evernote.com/shard/s119/sh/b8803c9b-4ea7-43dd-a2ed-1226080074f2…
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> -Vincent
> >>
> >> > Guillaume
> >> > ᐧ
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Eduard Moraru wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Guillaume Lerouge
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hi,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
<
> >> > > > valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Guillaume Lerouge
<
> >> > > > > me(a)guillaumelerouge.com>
> >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > Hi,
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Ecaterina Moraru
(Valica) <
> >> > > > > >
valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Guillaume
Lerouge <
> >> > > > > guillaume(a)xwiki.com>
> >> > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Hi Marius,
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Marius
Dumitru
Florea <
> >> > > > > > > >
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:58 PM,
Guillaume Lerouge <
> >> > > > > > > guillaume(a)xwiki.com>
> >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > Hi again,
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:39
PM, Guillaume
> >> "Louis-Marie"
> >> > > > > > Delhumeau <
> >> > > > > > > > > > gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >> Hi Eddy,
> >> > > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > > >> 2014-09-25 11:59 GMT+02:00
Eduard Moraru <
> >> > > > enygma2002(a)gmail.com
> >> > > > > >:
> >> > > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > > >> > Hi devs,
> >> > > > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > > > > >> > I`m not sure if we
already have a discussion
> started
> >> on
> >> > > this
> >> > > > > > > topic,
> >> > > > > > > > > but
> >> > > > > > > > > >> in
> >> > > > > > > > > >> > my opinion, it's
long overdue. I see people
start
> >> being
> >> > > > > confused
> >> > > > > > > and
> >> > > > > > > > > >> > questions like this
[1] start to be asked.
> >> > > > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > > > > >> > The new location of
the Add menu in Flamingo is
> >> > > problematic
> >> > > > > IMO
> >> > > > > > > for
> >> > > > > > > > a
> >> > > > > > > > > >> > various number of
reasons:
> >> > > > > > > > > >> > - It falsely gives
the impression that it adds
> >> > > page-related
> >> > > > > > > entries
> >> > > > > > > > > (i.e.
> >> > > > > > > > > >> > related to the
current page), due to its
current
> >> location
> >> > > > > (i.e.
> >> > > > > > in
> >> > > > > > > > the
> >> > > > > > > > > >> page
> >> > > > > > > > > >> > content)
> >> > > > > > > > > >> > - It conflicts with
AWM`s "Add new Entry"
button
> >> > > > > > > >
> >>
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > More generally speaking, this
is true for a lot of
> >> > > livetables.
> >> > > > We
> >> > > > > > > would
> >> > > > > > > > > > need a generic
"Create" button to be available
when we
> >> > > > > instantiate
> >> > > > > > a
> >> > > > > > > > > > livetable. This could be
useful for the wiki index
> >> page, for
> >> > > > the
> >> > > > > > user
> >> > > > > > > > > > directory, for all the AWM
homepages...
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > I guess you like the files live
table from the File
> >> Manager
> >> > > then
> >> > > > :)
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >>
>
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/File+Manager+Applicati…
> >> > > > > > > >
> . Would be interesting to have such a toolbar (with
> >> support for
> >> > > > > > custom
> >> > > > > > > > > buttons) before the live table
don't you think?
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > IMO the toolbar's functionality is
already covered by
the
> >> > > 'Actions'
> >> > > > > > column
> >> > > > > > > in the livetable. The only thing missing is
the 'Create'
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > I'm not sure this is the same use case. I can
see at
least 3
> >> reasons
> >> > > > why:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > IMO it's exactly the same use case, the only
difference is
that
> >> the
> >> > > > Actions
> >> > > > > column was used as an intermediate solution because we
didn't
> had
> >> bulk
> >> > > > > actions in livetable (the ability to make multiple
entity
> >> selection
> >> > > > > (checkbox) - that's why we duplicate the entries on
each
row).
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Great, this means that we agree on the fact that the
"Actions"
> >> column
> >> > > > should be replaced by a "Select" column with
checkboxes in
it, and
> >> also
> >> > > > that Marius' horizontal livetable toolbar should be
expanded
to be
> >> used
> >> > > in
> >> > > > a generic fashion by all livetables :-)
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Not completely replaced because not all operations/actions can
be
> >> performed
> >> > > in bulk fashion. Take the 'edit' action and notice that
it is a
> single
> >> > > element action compared to 'delete'.
> >> > >
> >> > > A different situation exists for the 'rename' action
since it is
> more
> >> of a
> >> > > single element action, but can be presented as a bulk action as
well
> >> if you
> >> > > provide some kind of renaming template like '_'.
> >> > >
> >> > > In other words, both the bulk operations toolbar and the actions
> >> column
> >> > > have their right place in the livetable IMO and having a
checkbox
> >> column
> >> > > like Marius did for the FM livetable looks like the right way
to go.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > > Eduard
> >> > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Guillaume
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > > Caty
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > 1/ The "create" button would generate a
new entry,
whereas the
> >> > > > "actions"
> >> > > > > > column is for actions that are related to
individual
entries
> >> that
> >> > > > already
> >> > > > > > exist
> >> > > > > > 2/ The "actions" column can be removed
by the livetable
> creator
> >> > > > > > 3/ The toolbar would also be useful to handle bulk
actions on
> >> pages
> >> > > > such
> >> > > > > as
> >> > > > > > "delete selected entries" (as in the
file manager)
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Best,
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Guillaume
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > > > > Caty
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Yes and yes :-)
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Guillaume
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > Basically the button would let
the user create a
new
> >> item of
> >> > > > the
> >> > > > > > same
> >> > > > > > > > > type
> >> > > > > > > > > > than the items displayed in
the livetable. Right
now
> we
> >> do
> >> > > this
> >> > > > > in
> >> > > > > > an
> >> > > > > > > > > > ad-hoc fashion, so it would be
great to have a
generic
> >> > > > solution.
> >> > > > > > It's
> >> > > > > > > > > also
> >> > > > > > > > > > related to the automatic page
name generation
module
> >> (that we
> >> > > > > don't
> >> > > > > > > > have
> >> > > > > > > > > in
> >> > > > > > > > > > the core yet, though
there's an extensions doing
it
> >> > > > > > > >
> > <
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >>
>
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Unique+Identification+…
> >> > > > > > > >
> >
> >> > > > > > > > > > ).
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > Guillaume
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > >> > - from my POV,
looking at the page from a far,
the
> >> new
> >> > > > > location
> >> > > > > > > > looks
> >> > > > > > > > > >> > completely randomly
selected:
> >> > > > > > > > > >> > -- It's not on
the left/top (as left-to-right
> >> language
> >> > > > > specific
> >> > > > > > > > brains
> >> > > > > > > > > >> are
> >> > > > > > > > > >> > trained to follow)
> >> > > > > > > > > >> > -- it's not
exactly at the top either
> >> > > > > > > > > >> > -- it's not at
the right
> >> > > > > > > > > >> > -- it's not next
to the type of elements it
creates
> >> (i.e.
> >> > > > next
> >> > > > > > to
> >> > > > > > > > > >> > WIKI/SPACE/PAGE)
> >> > > > > > > > > >> > -- it basically is
almost in the middle of the
> screen
> >> > > > > > > > > >> > - etc. (i.e. others
that don`t come right now
to my
> >> mind)
> >> > > > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > > >> Personally, I like the
fact that it is located
near
> >> the Edit
> >> > > > > > button,
> >> > > > > > > > > even
> >> > > > > > > > > >> if it does not concern the
current page. Because
it
> >> groups
> >> > > the
> >> > > > > > most
> >> > > > > > > > > basic
> >> > > > > > > > > >> and useful actions that
you need when you want to
> >> > > contribute:
> >> > > > > > EDIT,
> >> > > > > > > > ADD.
> >> > > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > > >> To me, it makes sense.
> >> > > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > > > > >> >
> >> > > > > > > > > >> > I`d like to open a
discussion on this, since
it's
> >> quite an
> >> > > > > > > important
> >> > > > > > > > > >> aspect
> >> > > > > > > > > >> > of the UI and, due to
it's shiny green color
(which
> I like
> > > > > :)),
> > > > > > > it`s
> > > > > > > > > hard
> > > > > > > > > >> > to miss.
> > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > >> > Is it just me who's
resistant to change, or do
> others see
> > > a
> > > > > > > problem
> > > > > > > > > here
> > > > > > > > > >> > with this as well?
> > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > >> > Eduard
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> devs(a)xwiki.org
>
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
--
Guillaume Delhumeau (gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the
XWiki.org project
--
Guillaume Delhumeau (gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the
XWiki.org project
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs