4 Sep
2008
4 Sep
'08
6:25 p.m.
On Sep 4, 2008, at 6:13 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
Vincent Massol wrote:
I agree. Ok let me say it differently then :)
There NO wiki syntax for indentation and I'm strongly -1 to introduce
a syntax for it right now.
Note that this doesn't change anything of what I'm doing. I mentioned
it simply because this is what most people will use for indentation...
and that it'll be the simplest way to do it. The other way will be:
{{html}}
<span style="...">
</span>
{{/html}}
Thanks
-Vincent
On Sep 4, 2008, at 5:59 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu
wrote:
But that's not right...
This is an example of an often mis-used HTML element for visual
purposes. Because dd is indented by default, authors use it instead of
defining a CSS class for a semanticless <div> element.
I'm -1 for using definition data elements for indentation. It breaks
the
semantics of the page. Vincent Massol wrote:
Indented block *are* definition lists :)
They are special definition lists where the definition term has not
been specified.
Hi,
I'd like to propose the following syntax for definition list and
definition terms. This is the syntax the most used by other wikis
too.
Simple definitions:
; definition title1
: definition1
; definition title2
: definition2
Nested definitions:
; definition title1
: definition1
;; definition title2
:: definition2
Indentation:
: first level indent
:: second level indent
::: third level indent
etc
Won't indentation get mixed up with lists? Like what if there's an
indented block right after a definition list?