24 Feb
2010
24 Feb
'10
5:14 p.m.
I like get too, +1.
JV.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Fabio Mancinelli
<fabio.mancinelli(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On Feb 23, 2010, at 4:59 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 15:38, Jean-Vincent
Drean
<jean-vincent(a)drean.org> wrote:
What about a simple "get"?
If you want to retrieve a resource for the sake of having it as a part of a bigger
request you can use a non-semantically-bound and generic action.
This could work for every resource: comments, images, attachments, etc.
If, on the other hand, you want some additional behavior associated to a specific
semantics of the action (e.g., logging or increasing the pageviews when it's actually
a view) you use a more specific action like "view", "download", etc.
(like it's done right now)
-Fabio
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-0 for a parameter for the same reasons as
Thomas.
+1 for a new action (/plain/ for example). IMHO If we discover a
Not sure about "plain" since the main use case that raised this issue
was about the comments content which is html. Unless you don't mean
"plain" as "plain/1.0" renderer syntax but i think we should use
something because it does not reflect the fact it's an kind of
sub/minor query.
Here is a list coming form the previous mails and some more i can
think of (feel free to add others):
* plain: -1
* viewinternal: +0
* internal: -1 (not related enough to view)
* service: -1 (there is no reason a service would not log the result in stats)
* minorview: +0.5
* subview: +0.5