4 Mar
2013
4 Mar
'13
4:26 p.m.
On Mar 4, 2013, at 4:15 PM, Guillaume Lerouge <guillaume(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Hi Vincent,
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
That's not my understanding: The filter is for all bugs not closed bugs.
Thanks
-Vincent
Hi devs,
I've created a new dashboard for stats about how we fare regarding bugs:
http://jira.xwiki.org/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=10352
Namely there are 3 majors charts (left column shows stats over the whole
period of the project while on the right stats are for the last 365 days):
* Created vs Resolved: Show how many bugs were created vs bugs resolved.
The blue line shows the evolution of non fixed bugs. We can see that we've
not been good till recently and only recently we're starting to invert the
trend.
* Recently Created Chart: The red bars shows how many bugs that were
created at given point in time are still open. I'm not sure exactly how to
draw a conclusion from this chart yet…
* Average age chart: Shows how long it was taking to fix a bug as an
average. For example on 1 Jan 2006 it was taking 184 days average to get a
bug fixed. And on 1st of March 2013 it's now taking 736 days average to get
your bug fixed… This shows how bad we are with bug fixing… By continuing
our weekly BFDs, we should see this average age go down normally… We should
also try to pick the oldest bugs first to make it go down faster ;)
Actually it's the other way round. If you close the oldest bugs first, you
will add bugs in the list that took a very long time to get fixed, thus
pushing the average up. If you want to make that number go down faster, you
actually need to close
the more recent bugs first... and never close the older ones :-)
Guillaume
> WDYT?
>
> Any analysis that comes to your mind?
>
> For me it means we really needed to start addressing our bugs and that are
> weekly BFDs are going in the right direction and starting to have some
> effects.
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent