On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
On Oct 28, 2008, at 11:07 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
vmassol (SVN) wrote:
Author: vmassol
Date: 2008-10-28 09:19:23 +0100 (Tue, 28 Oct 2008)
New Revision: 13864
Added:
platform/core/trunk/xwiki-rendering/src/test/java/org/xwiki/
rendering/block/XMLBlockTest.java
Modified:
platform/core/trunk/xwiki-rendering/src/main/java/org/xwiki/
rendering/block/XMLBlock.java
Log:
XWIKI-2785: The order in which XML attributes are printed when
converted to XWiki syntax is not fixed
+ public void testAttributeOrder()
+ {
+ Map<String, String> attributes = new HashMap<String,
String>();
+ attributes.put("aaa", "value1");
+ attributes.put("bbb", "value2");
+ XMLBlock block = new XMLBlock("element", attributes);
+
+ Iterator<String> it = attributes.keySet().iterator();
+ Iterator<String> newIt =
block.getAttributes().keySet().iterator();
+ while (it.hasNext()) {
+ assertEquals(newIt.next(), it.next());
+ }
+ }
I'm not sure this test is enough,
it's definitely not enough.
since the order for two attributes
could happen to be the same. Why not add 10 attributes (aN = vN,
where N
goes from 0 to 9)?
I've just tried this:
public void testAttributeOrder()
{
Map<String, String> attributes = new HashMap<String,
String>();
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
attributes.put("key" + i, "value" + i);
}
XMLBlock block = new XMLBlock("element", attributes);
Iterator<String> it = attributes.keySet().iterator();
Iterator<String> newIt =
block.getAttributes().keySet().iterator();
while (it.hasNext()) {
assertEquals(newIt.next(), it.next());
}
}
And the tests till passes even when I revert the implementation for
XMLBlock (i.e. no usage of LinkedHashMap).
Any more idea? Could it be that the test is wrong or the
implementation not correct? (I don't se anything wrong).
does not change anything, the most important is what is the initial
Map implementation of provided "attributes":
- if it's HashMap then there is nothing you can do here to have the
same order user set in the wiki syntax
- if it's already LinkedHashMap then you have nothing to do