10 Jan
2012
10 Jan
'12
11:42 a.m.
+1
Thanks,
Eduard
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Sorin Burjan <sorin.burjan(a)xwiki.com>wrote;wrote:
+1
Regards,
Sorin B.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
the
just
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 01:10, Sergiu Dumitriu
<sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> Since a long time ago, the xwiki/1.0 syntax has been deprecated in
favor
> of the new rendering engine and the 2.x
syntaxes, but this has never
been
declared
deprecated formally. We should:
* mark the syntax as deprecated in the UI (like 2.1 was marked
experimental in the syntax choice dropdown)
* deprecate classes and methods that deal only with the old syntax
* push more for migrating all documents to the 2.1 syntax; the biggest
troublemaker is the statistics application
Here's my +1.
+1
We should also decide on a timeline for the complete removal of the 1.0
syntax. Is that something we want to do? Provided we manage to migrate
all
> the official documents and some major contributed applications during > 4.x cycle, is XWiki 5.0 a good target? We
should package the support
for
xwiki/1.0
as an optional extension installable using the extension
manager,
> so that people can upgrade from older versions. Or we could package a
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
syntax migrator that can be used for an automatic
conversion to a newer
syntax, without actually providing rendering support for it.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
______________________________**_________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/**mailman/listinfo/devs<
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs>