7 Jun
2012
7 Jun
'12
8:57 a.m.
On 06/07/2012 02:28 AM, Ludovic Dubost wrote:
Hi what would be good to do is provide à script that
would detect syntax 1.0 docs in a xem.
I'm pretty sure there is still significant 1.0 code around. Even at XWiki SAS we have
still a lot on our own xem
This isn't about the xwiki/1.0 syntax, but about the even older wikiwiki
syntax. Here's a summary:
This is =code formatting=
This is *bold formatting*
This is _italic formatting_
This is __bold and italic formatting__
* List item
* but sublists are indented with groups of three spaces
* so this is a third level list item
Links are created by Space.CamelCase words, or just CamelCase words
The xwiki/1.0 rendering engine will remain in place for the moment.
We could have an option to load it on demand but have
that option off by default
Ludovic
Envoyé de mon iPhone
Le 7 juin 2012 à 00:51, Sergiu Dumitriu<sergiu(a)xwiki.com> a écrit :
> Hi devs,
>
> Most of the devs know about the new xwiki-rendering engine which provides the support
for the new xwiki/2.x syntaxes, and the old Radeox-based rendering engine which provides
support for the xwiki/1.0 syntax, but I wonder who knows about the Oro-based wikiwiki
engine that provides support for an even older undocumented wiki syntax? That one has been
in the oldcore sources before I came in contact with XWiki, and it has been disabled for a
very long time.
>
> One thing that we still use from that basic rendering engine is the support for
{pre}{/pre} code escaping, and that one will have to be preserved even if we remove all
the rest.
>
> The advantages of removing it include:
> - less ancient, unused, buggy code
> -- thus slightly less PermGen memory required and faster startup
> - one less Oro dependency (a long term goal is to remove Oro and ECS from our
dependencies)
> - fewer WTFs from people stumbling over that code
>
> Does anybody know of any users of that syntax? Is anybody still running 0.1.x
versions?
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/